Bro I've been in security since you were still swimming in your father's balls. It is clear you have no idea what you're talking about.
- Please explain how the fraud will work if 1) presales have escrow 2) exchange is launching BEFORE public ICO.
- It is 1000000x better for security not reveal private key holders. Tell me you know who Poloniex founders are? How long has Polo been running without incident? You reveal private key holders to the public, you put ALL customer funds at risk.
So I suggest you take a step back and use your brain for just 2 tiny seconds.
Also, what is with all the FUD. WCX has delivered on every single thing promised so far. The exchange launch and ICO are still far away, there is still time. I think they are just pacing. So stop being impatient and unless you have PROOF of any wrongdoing I suggest you eat a bloody hat.
Your dumb FUD is doing a disservice to all of us holding WCX.
"Also, what is with all the FUD. Your dumb FUD is doing a disservice to all of us holding WCX" LOL. It's not FUD. It's asking valid questions about a project/investment. Your polyanna white knighting is out of place and a disservice to WCX and credible investors alike.
"So stop being impatient and unless you have PROOF of any wrongdoing I suggest you eat a bloody hat." I'm not impatient. I'm asking questions that have ongoingly not been answered (that may or may not in the future) except by you how thinks that unbacked claims are proofs. Also I'm not accusing anybody of anybody of any wrongdoing, so I'm curious why your panties are in such a bunch.
"Please explain how the fraud will work if 1) presales have escrow 2) exchange is launching BEFORE public ICO." You claimed no fraud was possible, which is a laughable, impossible claim.
Also, what escrow? With who? What are the terms of said escrow? They -said- it's in escrow, no evidence. I'm not saying they're doing anything wrong, I'm saying they're making unbacked claims and that doesn't lend towards trust etc.
"Tell me you know who Poloniex founders are?" I don't. But you're saying that if I did, I could go mug one of them and get all the monies. WHICH IS A HORRIBLE SECURITY FLAW you seem to be ignoring while claiming to be a security pro. No back up systems? No two man rule (or more) for accessing funds?? The daily function of the exchange doesn't require those 'anonymous' people do be around and/or accessing the system, etc?
It would be great if you could drop the insults, it kills your credibility and is a toxic element on this forum.