Which pool is giving more coins with the same hashing power of workers?
The stupid one?
Lmao
LOL
Let's make a survey?
Topic: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup - page 379. (Read 663349 times)
October 13, 2016, 12:57:25 AM
The stupid one?
Lmao
LOL
Let's make a survey?
October 13, 2016, 12:53:50 AM
Which pool is giving more coins with the same hashing power of workers?
The stupid one?
October 13, 2016, 12:56:17 AM
Which pool is giving more coins with the same hashing power of workers?
The stupid one?
Lmao
October 13, 2016, 12:37:52 AM
It's very hard to mine this coin with CPU this week
Indeed! And it will only get worse
October 13, 2016, 12:20:46 AM
Here is a new pool on a very powerful server:
http://www.cpu-pool.com/xzc
Currently only 1% fee, please share some hash over.
http://www.cpu-pool.com/xzc
Currently only 1% fee, please share some hash over.
OK, but can you add 443 and/or 80 port for those who are behind the firewalls? That could be great.
p.s. why there are zeroes everywhere at your pool?
http://www.cpu-pool.com/xzc/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
http://www.cpu-pool.com/xzc/index.php?page=statistics&action=round
October 13, 2016, 12:00:28 AM
Which pool is giving more coins with the same hashing power of workers?
October 12, 2016, 11:57:16 PM
0.0043 now ,seems 0.01-0.02 next week...
October 12, 2016, 11:44:32 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
They also both have "founder's rewards" of 20% for the first few years. Incidentally the coin in your signature also has a very significant dev/sponsor subsidy as well. I'm not necessarily against this a matter of course, but it just smells bad imo to launch what is nominally a currency and give 10-20% away to the developer(s) and their sponsors. How can you expect something to achieve real world traction and broad adoption when one guy or groups singlehandedly controls 5 or more % of the entire circulation that will ever exist? Obviously Bitcoin is kind of an exception here...
I understand what you are saying... but one of the fundamental issues with btc is a lack of funding to pay for development. You can have a premine, or a block subsidy. A block subsidy is much more reasonable when used appropriately, because it's paid over time. Imagine if they had a 10% premine that they had access to... that's 2million coins!
Devs don't work for free. They deserve to be paid. You can't expect a dev to to great work when he can't feed himself / pay his bills.
I totally agree with you, but they are just taking a higher share from what they originally said they would take, someone pointed this out, and suggested a hardfork, but the case was closed
http://imgur.com/a/tBsHZ
Im not against zcoin, I've been mining all week
They really should consider dropping it to 10%... but 20% is fine with me as long as they are transparent and use it wisely (and build roger ver a fat stack so he can pump this)
October 12, 2016, 11:40:54 PM
It's very hard to mine this coin with CPU this week
lot of new miner
October 12, 2016, 11:35:57 PM
It's very hard to mine this coin with CPU this week
October 12, 2016, 11:11:05 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
They also both have "founder's rewards" of 20% for the first few years. Incidentally the coin in your signature also has a very significant dev/sponsor subsidy as well. I'm not necessarily against this a matter of course, but it just smells bad imo to launch what is nominally a currency and give 10-20% away to the developer(s) and their sponsors. How can you expect something to achieve real world traction and broad adoption when one guy or groups singlehandedly controls 5 or more % of the entire circulation that will ever exist? Obviously Bitcoin is kind of an exception here...
I understand what you are saying... but one of the fundamental issues with btc is a lack of funding to pay for development. You can have a premine, or a block subsidy. A block subsidy is much more reasonable when used appropriately, because it's paid over time. Imagine if they had a 10% premine that they had access to... that's 2million coins!
Devs don't work for free. They deserve to be paid. You can't expect a dev to to great work when he can't feed himself / pay his bills.
I totally agree with you, but they are just taking a higher share from what they originally said they would take, someone pointed this out, and suggested a hardfork, but the case was closed
http://imgur.com/a/tBsHZ
Im not against zcoin, I've been mining all week
I havent seen any reply from the OP or anyone related except one to debunk a post on being a scam coin. The Dev Should have fixed the reindex problem of the wallet and other raised issues by now. Dev are so lazy. This is what is going to kill this coin. We'll of course the dumping of the dev of their founders share.
October 12, 2016, 10:50:32 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
They also both have "founder's rewards" of 20% for the first few years. Incidentally the coin in your signature also has a very significant dev/sponsor subsidy as well. I'm not necessarily against this a matter of course, but it just smells bad imo to launch what is nominally a currency and give 10-20% away to the developer(s) and their sponsors. How can you expect something to achieve real world traction and broad adoption when one guy or groups singlehandedly controls 5 or more % of the entire circulation that will ever exist? Obviously Bitcoin is kind of an exception here...
I understand what you are saying... but one of the fundamental issues with btc is a lack of funding to pay for development. You can have a premine, or a block subsidy. A block subsidy is much more reasonable when used appropriately, because it's paid over time. Imagine if they had a 10% premine that they had access to... that's 2million coins!
Devs don't work for free. They deserve to be paid. You can't expect a dev to to great work when he can't feed himself / pay his bills.
I totally agree with you, but they are just taking a higher share from what they originally said they would take, someone pointed this out, and suggested a hardfork, but the case was closed
http://imgur.com/a/tBsHZ
Im not against zcoin, I've been mining all week
October 12, 2016, 10:40:20 PM
Its 12x more difficult now compared to 4 days ago.
October 12, 2016, 10:09:05 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
They also both have "founder's rewards" of 20% for the first few years. Incidentally the coin in your signature also has a very significant dev/sponsor subsidy as well. I'm not necessarily against this a matter of course, but it just smells bad imo to launch what is nominally a currency and give 10-20% away to the developer(s) and their sponsors. How can you expect something to achieve real world traction and broad adoption when one guy or groups singlehandedly controls 5 or more % of the entire circulation that will ever exist? Obviously Bitcoin is kind of an exception here...
I understand what you are saying... but one of the fundamental issues with btc is a lack of funding to pay for development. You can have a premine, or a block subsidy. A block subsidy is much more reasonable when used appropriately, because it's paid over time. Imagine if they had a 10% premine that they had access to... that's 2million coins!
Devs don't work for free. They deserve to be paid. You can't expect a dev to to great work when he can't feed himself / pay his bills.
October 12, 2016, 10:04:48 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
They also both have "founder's rewards" of 20% for the first few years. Incidentally the coin in your signature also has a very significant dev/sponsor subsidy as well. I'm not necessarily against this a matter of course, but it just smells bad imo to launch what is nominally a currency and give 10-20% away to the developer(s) and their sponsors. How can you expect something to achieve real world traction and broad adoption when one guy or groups singlehandedly controls 5 or more % of the entire circulation that will ever exist? Obviously Bitcoin is kind of an exception here...
October 12, 2016, 09:34:52 PM
I am pretty sure there are GPU miners for this coin but the developer would have to be crazy to release it for free. It would be like throwing money away in the toilet.
I know a couple of the top guys are cloud miners (azure/aws/etc...)
You might be right though.
October 12, 2016, 09:31:44 PM
I am pretty sure there are GPU miners for this coin but the developer would have to be crazy to release it for free. It would be like throwing money away in the toilet.
October 12, 2016, 09:05:51 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Are you late to the party? We know.
Zcash is based on zerocash protocol.
Zcoin is based on zerocoin protocol.
They both have pros and cons. http://blog.zcoin.tech/zcoin-and-zcash/
Roger Ver is backing both. They are both legit.
October 12, 2016, 08:32:57 PM
ZERO CASH is not the same as ZCASH.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
Two different currencies with two another DevTeams.
Kindly reminder.
October 12, 2016, 08:25:00 PM
Damn that dip just got bought hard.
Yes quite impressive but I don't see FOMO starting just yet.
Zcash around the corner making people cautious I guess.
Ver is going to pump this lol, he doesn't put his name on shit that sucks these days.
But you are right... the FOMO hasn't even begun. Stay tuned
Jump to: