Topic: 🌟🌟🌟🚀[ANN][04.07] ICO Starta - Cross-Coin Venture capital on the blockchain🌟 - page 84. (Read 153176 times)

what do you mean of starting ?
They allready made it ? Yes starta team made a lot of $$$$ and now they are rich, but sadly they dont care about investor, they ignored.

Seed means you can have your account safe. WAVES will give you a seed which is  like a mnemonic phrase for which you can save to import your wallet.  If someone has your seed, they can literally withdraw all your waves and all the tokens you have like STA.

The ICO of surety or any other startup in the portfolio is a new stage of financing that will positively impact the startup business and, then the market value of Starta tokens. Also, if startups from the portfolio issue their own tokens and distribute them among the team, shareholders and so on, then a part of the issued tokens will also be distributed to the holders of Starta tokens. The new tokens will be distributed proportionally to all participants. This is an impact a startup's ICO has on a starta token holder

"Back up your seed."
i dont know what you want me to do
what is a seed  
not good for noobs ...

This is public information.
Of course, it will be published in all sources.

How about future investments.
Will we see new startups that be added your portfolio?

Very good observation and well pointed out, hoping there will be response i mean meaningful response from the dev team.

Thats a wrong notion, we care, if not we wont be here

what do you mean of starting ?
They allready made it ? Yes starta team made a lot of $$$$ and now they are rich, but sadly they dont care about investor, they ignored.

Yep. I'm with the first distribution, but still waiting the translation bounties.

Have you any date for that Kairatka ?

Is this coin starting, or have they already made it?

Let me make this very clear, i don't care about nonsense with exchanges, I don't care about pump and dump.

I invested because I felt there was a clear investment to growth opportunity here. Very few ICO's come to market with a working product, much less a hand in multiple working products and many others on the cusp.

There is a clamor for exchange this, exchange that... madness

The truth is nobody can accurately value the token without an understanding of what the underlying investment is worth. So the exchange valuation (good or bad) is worthless. Without info the token is figurative at best (if i was an auditor I would take a dim view of not being able to quantify the estimate cost of your assets, very dim). 

Twice when asked (3 time if I'm not being charitable) you guys have not disclosed the impact of an ongoing ICO in an underlying holding may have on the starta token holders.

Can you please explain how the suretly (1.8 USD raise and counting) impacts our holdings???

From their whitepaper: "Suretly is planning to raise between $1.5 - $10 million USD in the next round of
financing by selling 15% of its shares"

Soooooo that values a 7% stake (the starta stake in the company per the starta webpage) at 800,000k. Given 1.5 mil to the 21 initial incubator companies is a return of over 10x

((1,800,000/15*7))/(1,500,000*7%)) = (current ICO/capital offered * capital held) / capital advanced


from the previous dismissive response "projected average 10 X return per company"

Funny: guy who backed up this dismissive post didn't even blink at the idea that 21* starta holdings were $1.9 million each, as suggested by the response ("go look at the website" I was told). Again I'll leave up to calculator kids to see how ludicrous this is (and how fucking stupid this supporter was) give the 21 * initial investments only accounts for 1.5 mil of the 5 mil raised at token sale. **clue** if the 1.9 valuations per investment were correct you FOMOs would be half way to the moon and  and not worrying about the next sig to display.
 
It is actually baffling to me that nobody else is asking these questions about underlying assets and are all fixated with bounty and exchange - true target audience should have been holders with sense, the could have been utilized to vote on future offerings, but no, they all seem to be pump and dumpers.

not a single question about valuation of underlying assets
not a single question about the "returns model" as described by the white paper

Just a shed load of bounty and exchange questions from people too stupid to see that sale of one of the 21 seed companies and a return to investors would benefit the value of their investment more than any listing on polo et al.


It actually pains me that there is so many FOMO and, to coin a new one, "No Understanding of the Investment Made" (FOMO + NUIM= worst people ever) folks that will benefit x times over my investment if this all pans out well