Topic: [ANN][1000 SYNC] Proof of Stake now run by BLOCKCHAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - page 242. (Read 816006 times)

Quote from: Kenta on June 03, 2014, 05:59:29 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

Get what you can, when you can. As soon as MsAdolf manages to contrive whatever it is this 'reward program' (pulled it out of his/her arse) entails, - he/she has already stated that it will be more difficult to see swings in price. Best you are gonna get, is today, i reckon.
and no, i'm not saying this because i want your Sync 'cheap'. 0.4BTC is in no way cheap for a shitcoin.

here is a link to show you where the sensible investment is;
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/kraken/btceur

enjoy.

MsCollec

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: MsCollec on June 03, 2014, 05:51:13 AM

Quote from: Kenta on June 03, 2014, 05:45:12 AM

Quote from: MsCollec on June 03, 2014, 05:51:13 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

Why does it matter anyway? Whatever percentage, it's relative to the coins kept and if you get 1 or 1000 % and everyone gets the same you still have the same share of total Sync anyway don't you? Inflation doesn't really do any damage when it's done like this...
So, if 100% interest psychologically works in a way that motivates people to keep the wallets as full as possible, online all the time and rarely in the exchanges; why not keep it that way? How can it possibly ever be better?

And please tell me? How are you going to convince people to "upgrade" to a wallet that give 99% less interest? In the world of p2p the majority decides, and you'll need to get the majority on your side to implement changes!

I only need to get exchange on the new fork. very simple.

Yeah, good luck with that! Do your worst! Roll Eyes

Hehehe

Kenta

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: Kenta on June 03, 2014, 05:45:12 AM

Quote from: Dlux75 on June 03, 2014, 05:36:52 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

Why does it matter anyway? Whatever percentage, it's relative to the coins kept and if you get 1 or 1000 % and everyone gets the same you still have the same share of total Sync anyway don't you? Inflation doesn't really do any damage when it's done like this...
So, if 100% interest psychologically works in a way that motivates people to keep the wallets as full as possible, online all the time and rarely in the exchanges; why not keep it that way? How can it possibly ever be better?

And please tell me? How are you going to convince people to "upgrade" to a wallet that give 99% less interest? In the world of p2p the majority decides, and you'll need to get the majority on your side to implement changes!

I only need to get exchange on the new fork. very simple.

Yeah, good luck with that! Do your worst! Roll Eyes

YAdaminer

hero member

Activity: 829

Merit: 1000

Quote from: YAdaminer on June 03, 2014, 05:28:19 AM

Quote from: Kenta on June 03, 2014, 05:45:12 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

Just few thoughts to consider.
Right now, coins are mostly in wallets for staking purpose and with 100% interest I think everybody are happy with that. That way rare coin is even more rare, coins are in wallets and there is no big sell preasure on exchanges. Basicaly, coins are miners, and who would sell his profitable miners.
When interest go back to 1% there will be no more intencive for leaving coins in wallet and sell preasure will grow which will lead to price decline, so we will again face situation we had when sync was in PoW phase. Right now the major reason for buying is/was 100% interest, I know that means 100% inflation per year but with amount of 1000 or 2000 that doesnt matter sync will still be rare coin. So current situation cused by 'problem' basicaly solve most or every coin problem which is lack of purpose and as benefit price we are aming is much reachable with low sell preasure. Rarity is not the purpose and will not drive price up, demand and purpose will so I think its bad idea to remove current major purpose of coin.

What he said Roll Eyes

Look, I'm almost sure that soon enough there will be coins that will copy this 'innovation' in which we are forced regarding staking problems, their problem will be their initial amount of coins. Sync doesent have this problem. I think we should go out with that as marketing point and price will go up, once we reach stabile price above 1, 2 or xx BTC or after a year, after rewards program go live we can change that back but right now I don't think it's right way to go. Basicaly, problem, error, mistake lead us into innovation

Think about this
Buy SYNC new type of coin miner - ROI 1 year or less

Anyway, greatest things comes when you least expect it.

MsCollec

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: srbty on June 03, 2014, 05:35:55 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

Why does it matter anyway? Whatever percentage, it's relative to the coins kept and if you get 1 or 1000 % and everyone gets the same you still have the same share of total Sync anyway don't you? Inflation doesn't really do any damage when it's done like this...
So, if 100% interest psychologically works in a way that motivates people to keep the wallets as full as possible, online all the time and rarely in the exchanges; why not keep it that way? How can it possibly ever be better?

And please tell me? How are you going to convince people to "upgrade" to a wallet that give 99% less interest? In the world of p2p the majority decides, and you'll need to get the majority on your side to implement changes!

I only need to get exchange on the new fork. very simple.

MsCollec

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

My flouvored wallet stucked again on 9263 block, won't sync. Why now?!

why are you still using flav wallet? Download the new wallet in the ANN page

Kenta

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: YAdaminer on June 03, 2014, 05:28:19 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

Why does it matter anyway? Whatever percentage, it's relative to the coins kept and if you get 1 or 1000 % and everyone gets the same you still have the same share of total Sync anyway don't you? Inflation doesn't really do any damage when it's done like this...
So, if 100% interest psychologically works in a way that motivates people to keep the wallets as full as possible, online all the time and rarely in the exchanges; why not keep it that way? How can it possibly ever be better?

And please tell me? How are you going to convince people to "upgrade" to a wallet that give 99% less interest? In the world of p2p the majority decides, and you'll need to get the majority on your side to implement changes!

sebastiebass

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

I'm guessing that the priority would be the initial selling point of the coin? meaning; an anonymous coin.

Dlux75

member

Activity: 170

Merit: 10

The World’s First Blockchain Core

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

Just few thoughts to consider.
Right now, coins are mostly in wallets for staking purpose and with 100% interest I think everybody are happy with that. That way rare coin is even more rare, coins are in wallets and there is no big sell preasure on exchanges. Basicaly, coins are miners, and who would sell his profitable miners.
When interest go back to 1% there will be no more intencive for leaving coins in wallet and sell preasure will grow which will lead to price decline, so we will again face situation we had when sync was in PoW phase. Right now the major reason for buying is/was 100% interest, I know that means 100% inflation per year but with amount of 1000 or 2000 that doesnt matter sync will still be rare coin. So current situation cused by 'problem' basicaly solve most or every coin problem which is lack of purpose and as benefit price we are aming is much reachable with low sell preasure. Rarity is not the purpose and will not drive price up, demand and purpose will so I think its bad idea to remove current major purpose of coin.

What he said Roll Eyes

srbty

full member

Activity: 135

Merit: 100

My flouvored wallet stucked again on 9263 block, won't sync. Why now?!

YAdaminer

hero member

Activity: 829

Merit: 1000

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

Just few thoughts to consider.
Right now, coins are mostly in wallets for staking purpose and with 100% interest I think everybody are happy with that. That way rare coin is even more rare, coins are in wallets and there is no big sell preasure on exchanges. Basicaly, coins are miners, and who would sell his profitable miners.
When interest go back to 1% there will be no more intencive for leaving coins in wallet and sell preasure will grow which will lead to price decline, so we will again face situation we had when sync was in PoW phase. Right now the major reason for buying is/was 100% interest, I know that means 100% inflation per year but with amount of 1000 or 2000 that doesnt matter sync will still be rare coin. So current situation cused by 'problem' basicaly solve most or every coin problem which is lack of purpose and as benefit price we are aming is much reachable with low sell preasure. Rarity is not the purpose and will not drive price up, demand and purpose will so I think its bad idea to remove current major purpose of coin.

HunterS

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Mrboot on June 03, 2014, 05:17:22 AM

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

yes it was 1% and i didnt invest in it at start.u than changed so i invested because it was worth the btc.going back to 1% i feel in my opinion is not worth holding.thats just how i feel.to be honest 1% per annum is just a joke

MsCollec

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

I Think its great its better to go back to beeing the intended rare coin why ppl joined , the main thing now is the future plan and development can you update us about that MsCollec ?

The major priority now is the Synclub Rewards Program, still undecided on how to set up the program. If the rewards should be based on blockchain or separate network. I will talk more about it when I have the time.

I want the conversion rate of the points to be pegged to $. With the fixed rate it will be hard to manipulate the price

Dlux75

member

Activity: 170

Merit: 10

The World’s First Blockchain Core

Still got 38MH pointing at the multipool guys, no payout fees for this round either!!

Dlux75

member

Activity: 170

Merit: 10

The World’s First Blockchain Core

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

it was mentioned earlier that to get people to invest you may need more of a incentive than one percent, not trying to rock the boat. Very happy with how this has worked you have the reigns your call, love ya work

Mrboot

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1000

i hope they dont change it.if so i will sell my 3.6 sync and jump ship .1% is not worth it

I will be glad to buy from you, it's hard to get that much Sync now. The initial interest was 1% I don't need any reason why anyone should be complaining about going back to 1%

I Think its great its better to go back to beeing the intended rare coin why ppl joined , the main thing now is the future plan and development can you update us about that MsCollec ?

MsCollec

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000