well ok, personally i wouldnt be scared off as a miner, but would be interested in investing more ;p
i guess if ur happy with the current supply on sell side then it's fine. my idea is that if u reduce mining reward then the coin is free to make rise with new investment till it levels off at the relative diff/reward value. we do have a 50% premine making it's way to the markets already. the price would eventually rise up to and past the same value per coin, just each coin would be worth more. returns from mining would eventually be the same even though there is lower block reward.
I'm not sure that made sense, like at all.
why? do u think that price has to stick with miners? we could pump aur to $500 right now even if there were only 5 miners on the entire network. it really doesnt matter. when the price rises the miners will come.
e.g pump aur to .02btc now and you will see the network housing more than 10gh. pump it to .050 and you will see appearing on the network 50gh. miners follow profitability not the other way around. and investors hold stable coins longer than coins that steadily drop in value.
im saying, if the block rewards were reduced significantly enough then the coin instantly becomes more valuable as there is less dump coming to the market. when that happens, itll get bought up due to low supply at low prices and it will return to a value similar to current income per day even with lowered block reward. miners generally sell and not buy. few im sure even trade effectively to multiply the coins they hold. they just cashout to btc and maybe straight to usd.
my point.. u could not gain value on this coin without attracting more hash. i will state and you can quote me on that.. "it's impossible". if the price rises, the hash will come. the question then would just be how much of that hash wants to dump and how much prefers to hold more longterm.