Oh come on, it's rather difficult to accidentally miss my post, four posts above this? I started to wonder if you deliberately "missing" certain posts as you somehow always failed to reply around same subject. There's nothing to hide, right? Everything is legit and it is an easy task to address my concern, right?
I think that there is some kind of misunderstanding happened. We asked you to contact our security specialist so he would give you all the details. However, as far as I understand, you just explored his LinkedIn page and that’s all. Now I’ll try to explain everything one more time.
Pavel Skybin is our security manager, who works on our software and knows all the details regarding audits etc. On LinkedIn it is mentioned that he works with BINcoin project.
With regard to the resume, he is a high-level professional, who doesn’t have much time for social media and representing. But you can find part of his experience on his linkedIn page.
Besides Pavel, our soft has been audited by an independent auditor - Yurii Bykov. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MWUR0H9Gvhl9A9V0RjQfg1qdSPWJTInx/view?usp=sharing)
The thing is, we don’t choose team members as well as auditors, who are considered on their appearance in social media like LinkedIn, but on their professional achievements. And we are sorry that you couldn’t find all the info at once.
We wish you a good day! If you’ll have more questions, please ask here or in private messages-so we could answer faster.
Have a nice day!
Just to clear the situation here and bitch a little bit --in regards to the text I bolded--, I am aware that Mr. Skybin just added detail about his employment with your company within these past days. I know because I rather memorized his linkedin page, kinda know when the consistency of his employment history changed, so I believe he added it as per my inquiry, thus stating a small "We are aware of this issue, will ask Mr. Skybin to add the detail" will look more nice instead of saying the sentence I bolded which implied that I somehow failed to read what was "there". Small issue, aired, let's move on.
In regards to Mr. Bykov, that's a little bit better, having an external auditor that list his resume as "independent auditor". I am sure he is not the only "World class researchers" you refer to on the opening post? Is there another auditor I should know about?
As you have noticed, we are in a developing process and yes, sometimes we find our gaps in something so unimportant for software specialist, like linkedIn page. And we are grateful for you in particular for making a point.
With regard to another audits, of corce we will do more of them as well as invite independent experts. But this will be possible after all the products would be issued
To date, our experts and auditors have done their work carefully and fundamentally. As far as the main products would be developed, we will make another audit with another experts. And of corse we will let our community know about it in social media and on the website.
Hope that we’ve answered on all your questions so far.
So, to conclude, how many auditors do auditing your security up to this day? Only Mr. Bykov? It will be a pleasure for me if I can get their names, for the sake of due-dilligence.
I see that Bincoin has a strong team and they do not shame to show themselves. Also Bincoin has a ready product.
Not agree. About a half of team members looks fake. And a word about genius naming.~snip~
Moreover, if you don’t trust the site, check ICO trackers like icoholder and find out that we all passing the verification + soon we will pass the verification process on the ICObench.
~snip~
And then, there is this... proud statement of being listed on ICOHolder and, soon, ICOBench. Yeah, I personally think it's a good way to kill trust.
wow...very weird point of view.
personally, I think that passing verification on above-mentioned portals - is a big plus to trust, cause all the team is represented clearly. I don't know why, but I can see that you just split hairs here. Look, the guys do a good job, lets be happy that truthful and useful projects still exist
