There was no exchange in the begining, he have been added two days ago, i don't want to speculate, i better like to be based on facts. Each time i intervenated in this project it was with facts and proofs, i never complained about anyone here, i always try to answer objectively, and now, i detected this problem, and i am talking about it, i am not hiding anything.
For sure i am part of the signature campaign, but if i detect something not logical for me, i talk about it.
Could you please send me the details of the scheme you talked about ? this way i will investigate it and see if it applies.
No other exchange approved their coin. And no one ever will, hence past 10 days they busy building their own exchange, the value of bitconnect coin is worthless for the moment as there is absolutely no relevance to it, or acceptance to it outside of their website.
This strategy is totally the best one, keeping the exchange internal is the best they could do regarding the whales on other exchanges, it is not hard to get listed as long you have the required amount of
BTC, the hardest part is the get a stable price, and this can only be done in an internal exchange, a lot of cryptos tried to fix their price at 1$ but had never been achievable on the long run, mainly because of pump/dump.
I totally agree that they should keep it internal, and develop their own exchange including other cryptocurrencies, plus, the code is amazingly well done. I checked the whole source, as i aleready said, i don't support a project without checking it entirely.
At last, a usefull investigation, thank you for the comments.
Don't believe that signature participants are idiots, if i am here it is to understand the bitcoin community, as i am a member of it. This way things are more clear, and perosnally i would never invest (myself or money) in a project i don't believe in.
Now regarding electroniccash, i think that in the end his accusation have been beneficial to the project, because it pushes us to ding deeper in the information collection, and it pushes us to learn more about the project.
Exactly, but an escrow is also a warranty of trust, it can help to bring in more investors because of the escrow's fame, but in this case, Electroniccash can't understand is that BCC have aleready hitted the minimum, and they aleready have the reputation, just have a closer look, they tried to use Bittrex but apparently they failed because of Bittrex, and it is totaly understandable as bittrex charges a lot, like 10% plus 5BTC and more on, iti s not reliable. It is less money for the project, and it wouldn't be fair for the other investors, who haven't asked for an escrow. So the escrow is not mandatory, and some of them don't hesitate to pump from the company's ressources, i better like the BCC team to use the budget for Bittrex as a buy-back in case of a dump to secure the currency price.
You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again.
It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me.
Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high.
Not trying to diss you Bud. Keep up the investigative approach, but id rather take a neutral stance vs a promotional / defensive stance.
Scheme? Just wait and watch, it will happen. Maybe a month maybe 3, how soon depends on how bad a job the marketting team does. You will see even more aggressive promotions, even more ads and banners like someone pointed out saying "They have a crazy good marketing budget so the coin is legit!!!! Totally a 7/5 (Cheers to those who get the reference
. There will be a pump, but it cant be validated as the platform is controlled by them (I.E Internal). And then a whole load of " I told you this coin is legit, I made $10 Million on it", followed by even more promotions. And then, and then the big squeeze.
Hehehehe. They just moved their "Volatility Bot Earnings" of their members to their fund. Hence forcing folks to "invest / buy" in BCC. Also the reason why they have no Escrow, also the reason why no refunds being given. 
