Topic: [ANN][BLAKE-256] DIRAC (XDQ) - Advanced Finance - page 19. (Read 75341 times)

Exactly.  On Twitter, he's claiming that Dirac's market cap is $10 million!

LOL.  What a scam!

OMG the FUD

This is the link

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XDQ


and for xdq/naut pair trading

https://www.allcrypt.com/market?id=741#

OMG this just gets better.

Watched a video from this guy and his ultimate "big plan" is to put ASIC chips in TOASTERS!

I am not making this up.

why not? - are they afraid the exposure of the real value of the coin compared to btc would cause it to crash?

at least Naut has shown a proven value and rise

inquiring minds want to know....

Sorry!
The page you are looking for could not be found.

link does not work

cannot even find XQD listed there!

Oh, wait.  He didn't just create AmKoin, he also RUNS the conspiracy theory website that it "honors".

Oh this is making so much more sense now.

What's next, ChemtrailCoin?  BlackHelicopterCoin?  ObamasBirthCertificateCoin?

LOL

by the way - how are the early miners doing trading their coins for Naut and selling Naut - has it been fairly profitable?

that's pretty cruel - though Hyandai's make some pretty nice cars nowadays but you can;t touch anything decent for under $23k

BUT FUNNY!

OK, I did a little digging to see what other coins the BIG EXPERT Coinweaver has been involved in.

Let's see, there's

PetroDollar - total market cap $8,814

OpenSourceCoin - total market cap $10,058

AmKoin - Not publicly traded, as far as I can tell.  Not surprising since it seems that the "economic purpose" of this coin was to honor a Conspiracy Theory website.  (No, I am not kidding.)

Yeah, you're a high roller, man.

If someone owned every single coin you've ever produced, they might be able to buy a used Hyundai.

the project is very interesting .But I need  time to understand more

Dear Bryce,

               I feel that I speak for many members in writing this to you regarding Dirac. We are here because we believe in the idea you have proposed, which is why we've been vocal about our concerns. However, I also feel that the majority of them have went unaddressed and you haven't exactly been providing the community with compelling reasons to continue backing your cause.

The pairing of Dirac with NAUT is interesting in many different ways. From a technical standpoint I don't think anyone will question that you are the better developer, with NAUT, BK understood this and reached out for help when he needed it. Dirac (if I understand correctly) is based off of Blake Bitcoin and one of the features that has been touted is...


With that being said, what real innovation does Dirac technically have, and what exactly classifies it as a "Financial Instrument"? I took the time to listen to your podcast (video too) and these questions still largely remained unanswered. I understand that the Blake256 algorithm has benefits in power efficiency, I understand that the Blake ecosystem allows for large scale merge mineable coins, but what else? Personally im not a programmer and I think you'll find that 99% of miners / investors aren't either, so being told to check out a Github repo does little in the way of boasting confidence to potential backers. We're not asking you to blueprint an ark here, we would just like some solid answers.

When it came to marketing, NAUT had it in the bag with media coverage, and a very active community here which BK was a very constructive part of. With Dirac you've made little to no effort to help and encourage users here (or elsewhere) to support your cause and furthermore you've belittled a majority of users here for asking basic questions about the project. BK manages a successful capital firm, he's a contributor to a major television network and yet he still finds the time to be helpful and answer questions from the community, why not you?

Being the crypto aficionado that you are; I think that you would have learned by now that a solid community can make or break a coin, you're currently dissolving yours.

Oh, the github that you didn't even bother to post.

Man, you aren't exactly good with people, are you?  I bet you don't get out of your parents' basement much.

Yes, you edited your post.  But the fact is that someone had to point out to you that it is impossible to fix the price of the coin.  

You don't even comprehend the most basic economic principles.  You are about as much of an economic expert as my dog. 

Why don't you disclose some of the other scams.. uh coins... that you have been involved in?

I can confirm - this one works for me!

Had the symbol wrong and renamed the market... how embarrassing....

https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XDQ

Thanks,
richie

I edited my post to fix the error in my OP and then posted here that I made the correction.

The codebase is in Github and publically readable.  If you can't figure out what to do from there you shouldn't be making coins.

Thanks for being the example of everything I was talking about that's wrong with BitcoinTalk.

Looks like a lot of excitement over this one!  A total volume of ... zero.  Not a single trade.  Ouch.

At least you don't have to worry about the fact that Coinweaver's such an ass decreasing the demand for the coin.  Hard to get lower than zero.

Though maybe people will start paying to have someone take their Dirac.  Kinda like how you have to pay for garbage removal.

And the award for the biggest asshole goes to Coinweaver.

Man, I asked a simple question.  Asked twice.  And you can't be bothered to answer because you once answered the same question on IRC?!?  

You said that, "Dirac has a specially modified codebase which allows for a process of currency cloning that is simpler than ever before."

My lack of understanding of your "specifically modified codebase" is not due to a general lack of knowledge in how crypto works.  It's due to the fact that you haven't -- you know -- published any information about it, except perhaps mentioning it on IRC once.

Well you know what?  I think your full of shit.  I think you are just making this up.

Your original post talked about a "fixed price" for your coin.  I see you've modified that now, but this reeks of the worst kind of scam.  Fools who don't even understand how markets work thinking that they can fix the price of a coin just by their say so.  There's another thread with a similar scam coin where the dev says it is worth .1 BTC and he's premined something like 1 billion coins.  Genius, right?  Wait, is that you who made that coin, too?

If you don't like Bitcointalk then why don't you just delete your fucking thread.  No one asked you to post here.

I have answered every single question asked in this thread on Twitter, in interviews and on IRC.

I have zero urge to repeat myself here.  I don't like BitcoinTalk.  I don't like the attitudes or the over-hyped crap that goes on here.

I make coins for use by people who know what cryptocurrencies are really about.  Those people are already mining and trading my coins.

I have plans for this coin.  I am not pushing it because I already know what is going to happen.

I do not dumb down my explanations.  I will answer questions but not those I have already answered 100 times.  If people ask the same question 100 times it means there's something missing in the general understanding of how crypto works.  I'm an engineer, not a tutor.

Most, if not all, of my coins are designed for a specific economic purpose.  I've added information to the OP which would help explain that: one is a radio interview on the David Seaman show and another is a short video clip.

All of it is in my own words and address every issue brought up in this thread.