Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | Non-Deprecated Thread (Read 5899 times)
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 05, 2017, 03:20:55 AM
it's almost a year for this thread, gonna say, Happy anniversary, may the year ahead gives more progress for this project.
January 05, 2017, 03:18:14 AM
QFT in case of censorship:
This.
thats no explaination. if it was put into alts why wasn't it stated here? http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts - this feels like back in the xc days, where it was promised to keep expenses of the premine public and then atcsecure "forgot" about it.
this is no FUD at all. if you invest in something you should inform yourself, and doing the same thing two times, promise A and do B is a showstopper. btw XC didn't loose value because of mintpal. It lost value because development stopped and promissed stuff was never delivered
That horse has been beaten to death already.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
This.
thats no explaination. if it was put into alts why wasn't it stated here? http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts - this feels like back in the xc days, where it was promised to keep expenses of the premine public and then atcsecure "forgot" about it.
this is no FUD at all. if you invest in something you should inform yourself, and doing the same thing two times, promise A and do B is a showstopper. btw XC didn't loose value because of mintpal. It lost value because development stopped and promissed stuff was never delivered
December 23, 2016, 12:55:22 PM
It's amazing that Blocknet's supposedly "deprecated" thread is so assiduously moderated to ensure only cheerleading is allowed and scam warnings are removed.
Two things I love in this "statement."
1. Says "I cannot announce anything" then immediately proceeds to announce an upcoming announcement "very soon."
2. The sniffy put down of "speculators" who were dumb enough to become bagholding investors in Dan's failed "business model."
What do cockroaches do when you shine a light on them? That's right, they scurry away to hide in some dark place.
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I cannot announce anything at this stage but I expect to be able to very soon.
Finally, BLOCK's price is tied intrinsically to the use of the DX. It's fundamentally not dependent on speculators on Polo. While I value Polo as a gateway, it's not part of our business model.
End of statement.
Finally, BLOCK's price is tied intrinsically to the use of the DX. It's fundamentally not dependent on speculators on Polo. While I value Polo as a gateway, it's not part of our business model.
End of statement.
Two things I love in this "statement."
1. Says "I cannot announce anything" then immediately proceeds to announce an upcoming announcement "very soon."
2. The sniffy put down of "speculators" who were dumb enough to become bagholding investors in Dan's failed "business model."
To think XC was once a rival for dash is terrible when you view the MC now. The XC holders (of which i have a tiny amount of) must feel gross disappointment at this stage.
ATCsecure needs to stop being scared of this board just because he got a hard time before. Man up and get back here and regroup you've stuck around long enough to prove it was not a total scam so come back on the board and get discussion and interest picking up here.
ATCsecure needs to stop being scared of this board just because he got a hard time before. Man up and get back here and regroup you've stuck around long enough to prove it was not a total scam so come back on the board and get discussion and interest picking up here.
What do cockroaches do when you shine a light on them? That's right, they scurry away to hide in some dark place.
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
January 04, 2016, 11:33:06 PM
Blocknet is backed with several high reputed devs. That`s why I entered in this token recently. It`s true that my favorite coin - XST - participates only technically in the this tech, but the tech itself is a new step forward in crypto universe. I believe in BLOCK.
Yeah i believed in XC too and the project seems to be now officially dead. As the same dev was responsible for this i wouldn't count on BLOCK to get finished in near future. Hopefully they don't change direction again and start with a new project and leave BLOCK like they left XC
XC is not dead.
The Blocknet is very much alive.
Please refrain from posting without supplying any kind of evidence.
//
Re. news, yes we have some. Publicity materials are ready too, but there's no release date as yet. Stay tuned. Join Slack too.
What nonsense. You hide (oh sorry, I mean stay in "stealth mode") in your self-moderated thread, where you "ban" anyone who fails to cheer and clap for your abandonware scam.
Your extraordinary claim that BlockScam is alive requires extraordinary evidence, yet you provide nothing except hand-waving excuses and mysterious teaser references to ever-receding doors behind doors.
Too bad your XC/Blocknet con isn't as successful as the Dash scam. Maybe you should add Masternodes!
December 11, 2015, 05:00:28 AM
Both the Blocknet's block explorers' hosting services have expired. Not cool!
More like "Not surprised!"
The block explorers aren't deprecated. They are just in Stealth Mode®.
If you want to know where the real ones are, you must join the Slack.
July 28, 2015, 02:51:27 PM
Why BLOCK price has fallen so much recently?
Probably people finally figuring out what BLOCK is really worth, and selling before everybody else figures it out.
BLOCK will be the first asset delisted from a decentralized exchange.
July 13, 2015, 06:40:56 AM
Unlike the paid shrills on BTCtalk, the Ethereum group can actually read code. When Ethereum releases the statement then all of you supernet fanboys will be coming out of the woodwork to cry foul.
Is there a link to this statement yet?
July 12, 2015, 10:10:49 PM
Why BLOCK price has fallen so much recently?
Not a clue I'm afraid.
Personally it looks rather nuts to me. Sell before the decentralised exchange is released? Crazy.
At least it's actually a very low volume. Perhaps it's just a couple of people who need the BTC or something.
I think it probably has something to do with all your links dying on the main post:
Now that's what I call deprecated stealth mode.
May 27, 2015, 04:48:54 AM
Unlike the paid shrills on BTCtalk, the Ethereum group can actually read code. When Ethereum releases the statement then all of you supernet fanboys will be coming out of the woodwork to cry foul.
I heard Dash is joining SuperNET.
This could lead to some kind of trippy scam-ception paradox, where jl777 has to travel back in time to scam Duffield out of his insta-pre-mine.
May 13, 2015, 03:12:17 AM
As far as the facts go; the funds are accounted for, there is a github with code, there is a functional cross blockchain bridge
Yes, this scene lives and eats of the image of coins, that's pretty much 90% of the game.. at least until the tech proves it's validity. Until then it's mostly promises on technology that is going to be build. Ask yourself, are you truly a crypto believer? Or does you personal financial interest moves your actions?
We can ask ourselves if we are truly a community if all we do is invest, hype and speculate. At least people producing code are doing something real!
Supporting a project financially means one should believe it may actually make a difference in the real world. It means being part of a supportive community and putting in your own energy and skills in order to help build those solutions.
Asking critical questions, sure! Developers and teammembers should stay sharp on their goals and promises.
Many projects have moved to other platforms because of the nature of these boards have been totally destructive.
These boards are for speculators, not for community members.
You're welcome to join the blocknet Slack if you are interested in a constructive talk.
And yes, very critical questions are asked by community members about how we deal with PR
Yes, this scene lives and eats of the image of coins, that's pretty much 90% of the game.. at least until the tech proves it's validity. Until then it's mostly promises on technology that is going to be build. Ask yourself, are you truly a crypto believer? Or does you personal financial interest moves your actions?
We can ask ourselves if we are truly a community if all we do is invest, hype and speculate. At least people producing code are doing something real!
Supporting a project financially means one should believe it may actually make a difference in the real world. It means being part of a supportive community and putting in your own energy and skills in order to help build those solutions.
Asking critical questions, sure! Developers and teammembers should stay sharp on their goals and promises.
Many projects have moved to other platforms because of the nature of these boards have been totally destructive.
These boards are for speculators, not for community members.
You're welcome to join the blocknet Slack if you are interested in a constructive talk.
And yes, very critical questions are asked by community members about how we deal with PR
May 13, 2015, 02:45:55 AM
Unlike the paid shrills on BTCtalk, the Ethereum group can actually read code. When Ethereum releases the statement then all of you supernet fanboys will be coming out of the woodwork to cry foul.
May 12, 2015, 08:11:31 PM
blocknet may have overreached making this claim, highly unlikely ethereum would associate itself with blocknet scam if they have looked into its history. hopefully they notice and disassociate themselves from it before any damage is done to the Ethereum brand.
Yeah, why dont you go tell'em?.. iam sure they are a bunch of retards who dont do their research themselves..
looks like yet another marketing attempt from blocknet to ride ethereum name, it would be more believable if their was something official from the ethereum side like here https://blog.ethereum.org/
as it is its just more attempts to pump blocknet coin with misleading articles. :\
anyway article was updated form earlier, its an Etherium devgrant that the blocknet devs applied for and is funding(aka free money) for any project that applies to etherium and manages to pass itself off as something for public benefit and provide some value to etherium core. Doesnt say they won it yet so even if they do what do they need the extra money for? Already suckered a huge amount of BTC from their ICO, why would it be necessary to apply for more funding?
May 12, 2015, 07:40:18 PM
blocknet may have overreached making this claim, highly unlikely ethereum would associate itself with blocknet scam if they have looked into its history. hopefully they notice and disassociate themselves from it before any damage is done to the Ethereum brand.
Yeah, why dont you go tell'em?.. iam sure they are a bunch of retards who dont do their research themselves..
May 12, 2015, 07:34:17 PM
blocknet may have overreached making this claim, highly unlikely ethereum would associate itself with blocknet scam if they have looked into its history. hopefully they notice and disassociate themselves from it before any damage is done to the Ethereum brand.
April 23, 2015, 05:27:44 AM
A think-tank that is trying to figure out how to generate value to the ITO investors should've been scheduled before the ITO? Better late than never I suppose.
April 20, 2015, 03:11:54 AM
Jump to: