[ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 71.

cryptoyes

member

Activity: 297

Merit: 10

beam:// is still not supported ...

Code:

bminer -uri beam://.worker%2Fbill.gates%40microsoft.com:[email protected]:3333

invalid value "beam://.worker%2Fbill.gates%40microsoft.com:[email protected]:3333" for flag -uri: Unsupported scheme
Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast (v12.2.0-937f19b)

beam+ssl:// seems to only work on sparkpool ...

Code:

bminer -uri beam+ssl://.worker%2Fbill.gates%40microsoft.com:[email protected]:3333

[ERRO] [2019-01-21T16:34:02+02:00] Failed to parse the response: %!s(*stratum.RawIncomingMessage=0xc420281440), error: json: cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint
[ERRO] [2019-01-21T16:34:03+02:00] Failed to parse the response: %!s(*stratum.RawIncomingMessage=0xc420281540), error: json: cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint

Do you have a special deal with sparkpool or what? This has been reported a long time ago and you released 3 new versions since then ... feels like you are ignoring it, and the fact that it only works on sparkpool feels like sparkpool is hardcoded. Disappointing.

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: erdnapa on January 21, 2019, 12:23:43 AM

Its 6.9% for me. 514 out of 7443.
You also have 3 out of 40, 7.5%.
I would still consider those numbers quite high, no?

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 11:22:15 PM

Quote from: erdnapa on January 20, 2019, 06:31:20 PM

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 07:36:02 AM

Quote from: Xdragon on January 20, 2019, 05:00:42 AM

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

It should be fixed in 12.2.0. I should have be more specific on the release notes. :-)

Same here high # of rejects, but running 12.2.0:

Code:

Rejected share #0 ({"code":-32502,"message":"Failed to validate solution"})

I just ran for a brief moments:

Code:

[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 6.19 G/s Temp: 72C Fan: 72% Power: 222W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 3.77 G/s Temp: 66C Fan: 43% Power: 136W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:29+08:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 2.50 G/s Temp: 62C Fan: 53% Power: 84W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:33+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:34+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:40+08:00] Received new job 1
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:42+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:49+08:00] Total 12.45 G/s Accepted shares 40 Rejected shares 3

The rejected share issue should be gone now. The message of failed to validate solution is because the pool has form a new job before the shares from the miner arrive. It's expected but it will be nice to have a better message.

interesting..let me run a little bit longer and see what I can find.

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

Quote from: logitech69 on January 21, 2019, 04:26:56 AM

Quote from: fistsofgod on January 16, 2019, 09:25:59 PM

BTW if you are using bminer on windows, on grinmint pool DO NOT format your bat file as follows:

Code:

%SCHEME%://[email protected]@%POOL%

doing this will create a new dashboard for you on grinmint under the email [email protected]
you can search for this email in the dashboard search box. using a syntax like this will not show under [email protected] with a worker named "worker"

You can probably omit the worker and password and it will just show under your email as "default" worker. I was trying but grinmint is down right now so I havent tested it. I tried email/worker and that didnt show under my dashboard either. I'm still trying to find the correct syntax for grinmint.

also on grinmint you dont need to include the password when mining and it is highly suggested you do NOT because bminer uses an unencrypted port

so no password is safer? please explain...

you only need to send the password the first time, to create your account. after the first connection you can then remove the password from config file.

the way grinmint works you never actually HAVE to have a password established for your email you use in the config, though you should for security and is accomplished on your first connection per email used.

logitech69

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: fistsofgod on January 16, 2019, 09:25:59 PM

BTW if you are using bminer on windows, on grinmint pool DO NOT format your bat file as follows:

Code:

%SCHEME%://[email protected]@%POOL%

doing this will create a new dashboard for you on grinmint under the email [email protected]
you can search for this email in the dashboard search box. using a syntax like this will not show under [email protected] with a worker named "worker"

You can probably omit the worker and password and it will just show under your email as "default" worker. I was trying but grinmint is down right now so I havent tested it. I tried email/worker and that didnt show under my dashboard either. I'm still trying to find the correct syntax for grinmint.

also on grinmint you dont need to include the password when mining and it is highly suggested you do NOT because bminer uses an unencrypted port

so no password is safer? please explain...

erdnapa

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Its 6.9% for me. 514 out of 7443.
You also have 3 out of 40, 7.5%.
I would still consider those numbers quite high, no?

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 11:22:15 PM

Quote from: erdnapa on January 20, 2019, 06:31:20 PM

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 07:36:02 AM

Quote from: Xdragon on January 20, 2019, 05:00:42 AM

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

It should be fixed in 12.2.0. I should have be more specific on the release notes. :-)

Same here high # of rejects, but running 12.2.0:

Code:

Rejected share #0 ({"code":-32502,"message":"Failed to validate solution"})

I just ran for a brief moments:

Code:

[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 6.19 G/s Temp: 72C Fan: 72% Power: 222W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 3.77 G/s Temp: 66C Fan: 43% Power: 136W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:29+08:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 2.50 G/s Temp: 62C Fan: 53% Power: 84W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:33+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:34+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:40+08:00] Received new job 1
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:42+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:49+08:00] Total 12.45 G/s Accepted shares 40 Rejected shares 3

The rejected share issue should be gone now. The message of failed to validate solution is because the pool has form a new job before the shares from the miner arrive. It's expected but it will be nice to have a better message.

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: erdnapa on January 20, 2019, 06:31:20 PM

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 07:36:02 AM

Quote from: Xdragon on January 20, 2019, 05:00:42 AM

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

It should be fixed in 12.2.0. I should have be more specific on the release notes. :-)

Same here high # of rejects, but running 12.2.0:

Code:

Rejected share #0 ({"code":-32502,"message":"Failed to validate solution"})

I just ran for a brief moments:

Code:

[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 6.19 G/s Temp: 72C Fan: 72% Power: 222W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:28+08:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 3.77 G/s Temp: 66C Fan: 43% Power: 136W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:29+08:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 2.50 G/s Temp: 62C Fan: 53% Power: 84W 0.03 G/J
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:33+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:34+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:40+08:00] Received new job 1
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:42+08:00] Accepted share
[INFO] [2019-01-21T12:19:49+08:00] Total 12.45 G/s Accepted shares 40 Rejected shares 3

The rejected share issue should be gone now. The message of failed to validate solution is because the pool has form a new job before the shares from the miner arrive. It's expected but it will be nice to have a better message.

NCarter84

jr. member

Activity: 195

Merit: 4

When will we be able to use 4gb cards?

erdnapa

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Quote from: realbminer on January 20, 2019, 07:36:02 AM

Quote from: Xdragon on January 20, 2019, 05:00:42 AM

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

It should be fixed in 12.2.0. I should have be more specific on the release notes. :-)

Same here high # of rejects, but running 12.2.0:

Code:

Rejected share #0 ({"code":-32502,"message":"Failed to validate solution"})

obm_dan

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 13

Support for bminer 12.2.0 has been added to Foreman. Now you can monitor your miners remotely and see exactly what you’re making - no wallet addresses needed. Grin

GEBucky

copper member

Activity: 127

Merit: 1

I am getting 1% or less rejects on f2pool with 3 1080ti rig. CPU usage is about 40pct on both cores: CPU Type DualCore Intel Pentium G4400T, 2900 MHz (29 x 100). Have 12GB RAM and 30GB Virtual Memory on Windows 10. GPU utilization is 99pct on all 3.

Note that if anyone is going through MRR as a proxy you are going to get high rejects on grinmint - need to use f2pool it that's how you are configured.

arielbit

legendary

Activity: 3444

Merit: 1061

Quote from: cryptoyes on January 20, 2019, 12:52:22 PM

Quote from: mrpcrp2 on January 20, 2019, 08:32:14 AM

good miner for no more than 3 gpu rigs
if cards more than 3 in rig , gpu utilization fall down less 30% even though powerfull cpu (i3 , i5)
win7x64 , 417.35 , 8Gb RAM , 82 Gb swap

Exactly my findings too. This miner is relying too much on the CPU which becomes the bottleneck and can't handle more interrupt requests to GPUs ... he seems to be trying to improve this, and said v12.2.0 optimized cpu usage but i found no improvement for my 13 gpu rigs.

note: 1080ti only (3 card rigs)

i'm a 4 gpu per rig miner so migrating to 3 gpu is quite easy...assembling a 3 gpu rig and taking a gpu from other rigs makes me 4 rigs (of 3 gpus) hehe..

now, cpu observation, same settings.. q8400, q9400 and anything around that generation gives 15.x G/s, starting from AMD x3 720, x4 960T to fx 6300 can give around 16.x G/s and i7 8700k rig gives 17.x G/s

can mine at 4gb ram, 33gb page file in windows 7.

i remember back when ethminer was still the miner i'm using until claymore makes an ETH miner and continue to optimize it i noticed that my rig with a e8400 cpu has a bit lower hash rate than my q9000 series rigs even when the miner claymore made was already optimized, i replaced the cpu and hashrate increased.

cryptoyes

member

Activity: 297

Merit: 10

Quote from: mrpcrp2 on January 20, 2019, 08:32:14 AM

good miner for no more than 3 gpu rigs
if cards more than 3 in rig , gpu utilization fall down less 30% even though powerfull cpu (i3 , i5)
win7x64 , 417.35 , 8Gb RAM , 82 Gb swap

Exactly my findings too. This miner is relying too much on the CPU which becomes the bottleneck and can't handle more interrupt requests to GPUs ... he seems to be trying to improve this, and said v12.2.0 optimized cpu usage but i found no improvement for my 13 gpu rigs.

Derloda

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 1

Quote from: grendel25 on January 19, 2019, 12:23:48 PM

Quote from: realbminer on January 08, 2019, 09:58:56 PM

Quote from: evlo on January 08, 2019, 02:47:44 PM

I tried on leafpool. Login to pool successful, but then messages like
[ERRO] [2019-01-08T20:36:13+01:00] Failed to parse the response: %!s(*stratum.RawIncomingMessage=0xc042152dd0), error: json: cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint
[ERRO] [2019-01-08T20:36:16+01:00] Failed to parse the response: %!s(*stratum.RawIncomingMessage=0xc0421767d0), error: json: cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint
[ERRO] [2019-01-08T20:36:16+01:00] Failed to parse the response: %!s(*stratum.RawIncomingMessage=0xc042152e80), error: json: cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint

cannot unmarshal number -22 into Go struct field .code of type uint

forever

I tried it with just worker and and with worker name and email while replacing @ and / with corresponding special characters in URI format

Hi evlo, sorry that Bminer didn't support leaf pool at this moment.
Bminer supports Sparkpool and beepool already, please use other pools instead first.

when support for Leaf?

Would like to see leaf support too

mrpcrp2

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

good miner for no more than 3 gpu rigs
if cards more than 3 in rig , gpu utilization fall down less 30% even though powerfull cpu (i3 , i5)
win7x64 , 417.35 , 8Gb RAM , 82 Gb swap

RivAngE

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 169

What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger

Quote from: coinut on January 20, 2019, 08:05:55 AM

running more than 3 gpus results in much slower speed. hashrate drops by over 33% per card if more than 3 gpus are selected

Windows 7

gtx 1070

bminer-v12.2.0

+ 60GB pagefile

I don't think this is OS related since I've noticed a lot of people mentioning it in the Discord.
Maybe it's natural for this algo? I don't know... I'm a hobbist 1-GPU miner ! Grin

coinut

full member

Activity: 253

Merit: 100

running more than 3 gpus results in much slower speed. hashrate drops by over 33% per card if more than 3 gpus are selected

Windows 7

gtx 1070

bminer-v12.2.0

+ 60GB pagefile

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: Xdragon on January 20, 2019, 05:00:42 AM

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

It should be fixed in 12.2.0. I should have be more specific on the release notes. :-)

Overmaster_007

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Have problem on 3 rigs:

INFO] [2019-01-20T13:39:13+02:00] CUDA error DRIVER: '700' in func 'bminer::cuckoo::CuckarooSolverCuda::CollectEdges' line 205
[FATA] [2019-01-20T13:39:14+02:00] Fatal cuda error in GPU 4. Terminate soon...
[WARN] [2019-01-20T13:39:16+02:00] Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

After disable any 1 gpu in system setting, all work good, but have 3 unused gpu(

Have BSOD any time after mesage: Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

BSOD:
dxgmms2.sys
watchdog.sys

Xdragon

hero member

Activity: 543

Merit: 500

^ yes , I also have more reject on eu grinmint server, than on chineese f2pool. And I am from eu

I also have very low hash on spark with 12.1, did not try this new 12.2 version on spark yet. NBminer works perfect on spark 0% rejects

surkoff

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

why so many rejects on grinmint comparing with f2pool?
On f2pool i got about 6% of rejects, but on grinmint it is about 10% with 'code 32502 failed to validate solution'

Topic: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 71. (Read 148347 times)