[ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 99.

xxxyyyzzz

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: Keko Fdez on June 12, 2018, 03:59:47 PM

Quote from: xxxyyyzzz on June 11, 2018, 07:41:58 AM

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares. thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98% for running like 24h or so... this miner v6 ..8... has a large number of rejection.

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares. that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

nope this is not me, v6 work perfecly for me, v7 has some bugs and v8 work ok.

dstm i never tested in way of rejected shares, only read what console outputs and its been 0.99% accpeted. so i guess 1% reject... so far i dont know if this is ok or not.

Keko Fdez

jr. member

Activity: 108

Merit: 7

Quote from: xxxyyyzzz on June 11, 2018, 07:41:58 AM

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares. thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98% for running like 24h or so... this miner v6 ..8... has a large number of rejection.

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares. that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: EPEMA on June 11, 2018, 10:01:05 AM

Quote from: realbminer on June 11, 2018, 07:18:05 AM

Quote from: EPEMA on June 11, 2018, 07:07:52 AM

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

I am happy with the quick response. Good work. BTCZ already on June 16, this week switches to Equihash 144.5 Fork will take place on the block of 160,000 (if not mistaken). I also read in the tweeter that the BTG team thanked the developers of the BTCZ community for their assistance in combating asiks, which means that they also go over to 144.5 (I will not tell you in detail, I do not follow BTG). Development of the miner for Equichash 144.5 for the BTCZ community is carried out by renuzit (https://github.com/btcz/zhasher), Miner zhasher is currently very poorly optimized, it would be great if you implemented the support of Equihash 144.5 in your miner using your knowledge and experience ...

Hi EPEMA:
Thanks again for the message.
We will follow BTCZ's movement closely and we will try the best to release Equihash 144.5 soon.

fabry1999

full member

Activity: 279

Merit: 100

Quote from: newmz on June 12, 2018, 03:23:50 AM

Quote from: fabry1999 on June 12, 2018, 02:11:14 AM

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

Hi there - I have seen this on a few GPUs over the years on different miners & it was usually a bad riser, rather than the software - or sometimes if you are running overclocking software (like MSI Afterburner) at the same time as mining software it can interfere because the overclocking software is polling the card for temperature and the miner is trying to get temp at the same time.

Mostly though, as I said - it is a sign that a riser is dead or dying.

Do you see this (or any other problems) when running any other mining software or just Bminer?

After a couple of reboot the problem was solved, In past I had the same problem with claymore miner but in that case there was a command option in order to ignore this kind of warning that in bminer is not present or I didn't find on documentation.

newmz

sr. member

Activity: 372

Merit: 250

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom

Quote from: fabry1999 on June 12, 2018, 02:11:14 AM

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

Hi there - I have seen this on a few GPUs over the years on different miners & it was usually a bad riser, rather than the software - or sometimes if you are running overclocking software (like MSI Afterburner) at the same time as mining software it can interfere because the overclocking software is polling the card for temperature and the miner is trying to get temp at the same time.

Mostly though, as I said - it is a sign that a riser is dead or dying.

Do you see this (or any other problems) when running any other mining software or just Bminer?

fabry1999

full member

Activity: 279

Merit: 100

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

xxxyyyzzz

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: realbminer on June 11, 2018, 08:08:53 AM

Quote from: xxxyyyzzz on June 11, 2018, 07:41:58 AM

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares. thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98% for running like 24h or so... this miner v6 ..8... has a large number of rejection.

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Hi, thanks for your feedback.
Would you please give me your log for me to detect what happens?

sure. where do you want it?

here is another 10h run...

A: 1040 - R: 18
so 1.73%

i'm tracing packets via tcpview and i see 1058 packet sent, so all good, just have to work on reject shares a little.

EPEMA

jr. member

Activity: 53

Merit: 4

Quote from: realbminer on June 11, 2018, 07:18:05 AM

Quote from: EPEMA on June 11, 2018, 07:07:52 AM

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

I am happy with the quick response. Good work. BTCZ already on June 16, this week switches to Equihash 144.5 Fork will take place on the block of 160,000 (if not mistaken). I also read in the tweeter that the BTG team thanked the developers of the BTCZ community for their assistance in combating asiks, which means that they also go over to 144.5 (I will not tell you in detail, I do not follow BTG). Development of the miner for Equichash 144.5 for the BTCZ community is carried out by renuzit (https://github.com/btcz/zhasher), Miner zhasher is currently very poorly optimized, it would be great if you implemented the support of Equihash 144.5 in your miner using your knowledge and experience ...

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: xxxyyyzzz on June 11, 2018, 07:41:58 AM

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares. thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98% for running like 24h or so... this miner v6 ..8... has a large number of rejection.

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Hi, thanks for your feedback.
Would you please give me your log for me to detect what happens?

xxxyyyzzz

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares. thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98% for running like 24h or so... this miner v6 ..8... has a large number of rejection.

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: EPEMA on June 11, 2018, 07:07:52 AM

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

EPEMA

jr. member

Activity: 53

Merit: 4

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

mineoneone

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Only been running it a short while but Sol/s reports slightly lower but more accurate when compared to the pool website.

I have two identical rigs but for the last few versions one was always 20 Sol/s slower, now it's a litter higher and the other is lower in the console and the pool is tracking both to a 2-4 Sol/s variance.

Also, I don't know what you're doing but with every few updates you manage to cool my cards a degree or two which is always helpful Grin

Bminer & Z-Enemy are killing it right now Cool

sergey1301

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

Does Linux support MMX? Is MARS used? Someone checked? Do 1060 and 1070 tariffs for the pool are big?

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49

Quote from: Keko Fdez on June 01, 2018, 03:13:38 AM

Quote from: supermoew on May 31, 2018, 09:51:02 PM

Quote from: Keko Fdez on May 28, 2018, 10:31:00 AM

Quote from: Keko Fdez on May 27, 2018, 11:18:54 PM

For realbminer

As people has reported a drop in the hashrate for Equihash with version 8.0 could you please make available the previous versions so we can use the one that works better?

I have tried 8.0 and I get 3160 sols/s average with my 6 GTX 1070 Ti but can’t compare to previous versions if it is better or worse. I do can confirm the rejected shares rate has drop and the miner is more stable than before.

I think it will be nice it you could keep previous versions available to use so we can benefit from the one that works better for us, diferente OS, configs, etc

I actually thought and posted the rejected shares had improved but I think it is not the case. Please realbminer have a look at this:

Miner it’s been running since 11:20 non stop and has reported only 10 rejected shares pretty much in 1370 so that’s 0.73% rejected shares.

But flypool server reports far more rejected shares than your miner does in the console. I actually has reported 30 rejected shares vs 10 on the miner console. If we use that figure is 2.19% rejected share.

How is that possible? It’s 200% more rejected shares on the pool that in the miner itself.

Thanks

Hey but I have a question that I didn't see the 30 rejected shares you mentioned in the second picture.

Supermoew

count the green bars at the bottom of the picture you will get 20 small green bars and 5 double green bars. Single green are one rejected share and the double are 2 rejected share. Those are the 30 rejected shares

Hi Keko Fdez：
thank you for your reply. I will take a look to your problem and hope to reply you in this week.

realbminer

member

Activity: 461

Merit: 49