i still don't see the point of this coin other than dwelling on human greed with masternodes and such. I'm not saying that there is no point, just that i can't see it. Please help me understand. Dash brought us technology and ideology, this coin was forked of fork of dash, just saying
I think greed (or looking out for one's "enlightened self-interest"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlightened_self-interest -- which isn't the same thing) is going to be a factor with any form of money.
Differences with this coin and DASH include the PoS potential of income generation after one year; DASH, of course, doesn't feature PoS. There is a larger eventual supply of BWK than of DASH (which would tend to lower the price of Bulwark relative to DASH). Also, the cost of acquiring a masternode with DASH at a cost of $935,000 USD compared to BWK's $21,800, the current or anticipated return-on-investment [ROI], and even the differences in percentage of coins locked -- as can be seen at or hypothesized from (in the case of the anticipated ROI) mnrank.com -- are a significant difference at this moment.
Differences with PIVX include that this is a coin that is currently mineable (as PIVX is entirely PoS/Masternode now) and Bulwark has a smaller eventual supply.
Both DASH and PIVX are more established coins with larger market caps, so it takes more fiat/credit or crypto to push the needle in terms of price on those.
The OP indicated that the devs are looking to implement various things outside the scope of what DASH or PIVX are doing -- so time will tell what will unfold as there are different groups (of devs and users in different proportions) in each coin's network.
So, it's similar in nature to both... but the compositions and specifics of the three networks have differences also. Obviously too there is the aspect of offering a shot at participating in the early days of the other two coins.