Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][CAGE] CAGECOIN REVIVAL: New difficulty algorithm, network moving again! - page 18. (Read 68795 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
The burn period for Cagecoin has begun, and will end at 23:59 September 28. 

Follow the above instructions to participate, and see our ANN for full details:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-barr-the-only-cryptocurrency-where-no-ones-ever-lost-money-1219460

Check the balance of the burn address at this link:
http://cagechain.info/address/DUUhXNEw1bNAMSKgm1Kt2tSPWdzF8952Np
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Anyway the Cagecoin burn starts in a little over 24 hours. 

Send a private message to this account with the number of CAGE you're burning, and your NXT address.  (Don't use a NXT deposit address from an exchange.)  Then send your CAGE to the burn address. 

The burn address is:   DUUhXNEw1bNAMSKgm1Kt2tSPWdzF8952Np

When your transaction shows up with confirmations on the block explorer, we will send your BARR to your NXT account.

You will receive 1 BARR for every 500,000 CAGE you burn, which is .00000200 BARR per CAGE.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
Code:
COIN = 100 * 1000 * 1000
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN
nHeight = 0
total = 0
while nSubsidy != 0:
    nSubsidy = 50 * COIN
    nSubsidy >>= nHeight / 210000
    nHeight += 1
    total += nSubsidy

print total / float(COIN)



If you run this in Python, you will find that the number will not be 21,000,000, and that's according to the code you posted.

It can't be defined in the code as two different numbers, and you keep saying a number that is incorrect, and therefore you are incorrect about what the code says.  

I'll wait while you run that program (lol).

Anyway all that is irrelevant, because you're talking about what the supply of bitcoins might be in the future.  Nothing you're saying has anything to do with how many bitcoins exist right now.  

The number is a fraction of a hair under 21,000,000. Don't be stupid.

We're not talking about what it 'might' be in the future, we are talking about what it is programmed to be right now.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Code:
COIN = 100 * 1000 * 1000
nSubsidy = 50 * COIN
nHeight = 0
total = 0
while nSubsidy != 0:
    nSubsidy = 50 * COIN
    nSubsidy >>= nHeight / 210000
    nHeight += 1
    total += nSubsidy

print total / float(COIN)



If you run this in Python, you will find that the number will not be 21,000,000, and that's according to the code you posted.

It can't be defined in the code as two different numbers, and you keep saying a number that is incorrect, and therefore you are incorrect about what the code says. 

I'll wait while you run that program (lol).

Anyway all that is irrelevant, because you're talking about what the supply of bitcoins might be in the future.  Nothing you're saying has anything to do with how many bitcoins exist right now. 
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
How were there 92 Billion bitcoins on the blockchain, if only 21 million exist and must be unlocked to get access to them?  

You're so full of shit it isn't even funny.


So you have no clue how to answer the question.  It's okay to admit you're wrong and have no answer.




Quote
Quote
In other words, bitcoin's inventor Nakamoto set a monetary policy at the start of the bitcoin concept that there would only ever be 21 million bitcoins in total, their numbers being released roughly every ten minutes, and the rate at which they would be generated would drop by half every four years until all were in circulation

Programming isn't always perfect and bugs do pop up and get corrected.



You're such an expert that you're quoting the Wikipedia article about Bitcoin.  That is sad.

Why not post the code that sets the number of coins?  
How about the code that created the 21 million coins and keeps them locked away, where is that code?



Since Wikipedia is your source of information about Bitcoin, look at this quote from the same Wikipedia entry you quoted:

Quote
The blockchain is a distributed database – to achieve independent verification of the chain of ownership of any and every bitcoin


According to Wikipedia, which is your chosen source of information, any and every bitcoin in existence is on the blockchain.

If it's not on the blockchain, it didn't happen.  If coins aren't on the blockchain, they don't exist.


And again:  


Quote
All bitcoins in existence have been created in such coinbase transactions.


That's pretty clear.  It says all bitcoins in existence come from mining rewards.  Therefore, 21 million coins don't exist.

Please show us 21 million bitcoins on the blockchain, or admit that all those coins aren't on the blockchain and therefore don't exist.

int64 static GetBlockValue(int nHeight, int64 nFees)
{
    int64 nSubsidy = 50 * COIN;

    // Subsidy is cut in half every 210000 blocks, which will occur approximately every 4 years
    nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 210000);

    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}



Code is designed to do exactly what it is coded to do. It's not hard to come to the conclusion that using the above formula puts the total coin count to 21,000,000.

As I said before, the coins are there and are only given out when certain conditions are met, aka mining and other variables.

The blockchain has to abide by the code set forth above.

Everyone but you understands that there are a total of 21 million BTC.

In case you didn't know, there is a difference between total supply and available supply, use google if this is too hard for you to understand.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
How were there 92 Billion bitcoins on the blockchain, if only 21 million exist and must be unlocked to get access to them?  

You're so full of shit it isn't even funny.


So you have no clue how to answer the question.  It's okay to admit you're wrong and have no answer.




Quote
Quote
In other words, bitcoin's inventor Nakamoto set a monetary policy at the start of the bitcoin concept that there would only ever be 21 million bitcoins in total, their numbers being released roughly every ten minutes, and the rate at which they would be generated would drop by half every four years until all were in circulation

Programming isn't always perfect and bugs do pop up and get corrected.



You're such an expert that you're quoting the Wikipedia article about Bitcoin.  That is sad.

Why not post the code that sets the number of coins?  
How about the code that created the 21 million coins and keeps them locked away, where is that code?



Since Wikipedia is your source of information about Bitcoin, look at this quote from the same Wikipedia entry you quoted:

Quote
The blockchain is a distributed database – to achieve independent verification of the chain of ownership of any and every bitcoin


According to Wikipedia, which is your chosen source of information, any and every bitcoin in existence is on the blockchain.

If it's not on the blockchain, it didn't happen.  If coins aren't on the blockchain, they don't exist.


And again: 


Quote
All bitcoins in existence have been created in such coinbase transactions.


That's pretty clear.  It says all bitcoins in existence come from mining rewards.  Therefore, 21 million coins don't exist.

Please show us 21 million bitcoins on the blockchain, or admit that all those coins aren't on the blockchain and therefore don't exist.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
How were there 92 Billion bitcoins on the blockchain, if only 21 million exist and must be unlocked to get access to them? 

You're so full of shit it isn't even funny.

Quote
In other words, bitcoin's inventor Nakamoto set a monetary policy at the start of the bitcoin concept that there would only ever be 21 million bitcoins in total, their numbers being released roughly every ten minutes, and the rate at which they would be generated would drop by half every four years until all were in circulation

Programming isn't always perfect and bugs do pop up and get corrected.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net

Total BTC - 21,000,000
Market Value - $608.1
Market Cap - $12,770,100,000


And is there anyone else in the world who agrees with you, that the market cap is $12 billion?





Quote
You can't seem to grasp that there are a total of 21,000,000 BTC, not 15,862,536. Just because a small portion of those 'shares' are not owned right now doesn't mean they don't exist.


How do they exist?  They can't be used as capital, and they're not on the market, so in what way can they be counted as market capitalization?

So you mean to tell me that BTC does not have a total coin supply of 21,000,000 coins even though it is programmed to have that many? My mind is truly blown, here I thought for all these years that the entire BTC community knew what they were talking about regarding the total amount of BTC.

Being a developer myself I must be a really shitty one if I somehow managed to misread the code used to create BTC. I must be an even dumber person after taking university classes that taught me how BTC operates and functions.

Just because nobody owns the rest doesn't mean they don't exist. Certain conditions have to be met in order to unlock access to those coins.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500

Total BTC - 21,000,000
Market Value - $608.1
Market Cap - $12,770,100,000


And is there anyone else in the world who agrees with you, that the market cap is $12 billion?





Quote
You can't seem to grasp that there are a total of 21,000,000 BTC, not 15,862,536. Just because a small portion of those 'shares' are not owned right now doesn't mean they don't exist.


How do they exist?  They can't be used as capital, and they're not on the market, so in what way can they be counted as market capitalization?
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net


Total BTC - 21,000,000
Market Value - $608.1
Market Cap - $12,770,100,000

You can't seem to grasp that there are a total of 21,000,000 BTC, not 15,862,536. Just because a small portion of those 'shares' are not owned right now doesn't mean they don't exist.


hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net

For example, someone could sell 0.00000001 BTC for $1 higher than ask price and bang, BTC market cap just increased by $21,000,000.


Actually it would increase by about $15.8 million, and only if nobody else was buying and selling.  

Would you like me to explain it to you, or do you like being wrong?

I am not wrong. There is a max total of 21,000,000 BTC, a market cap is the total amount of shares offered by a company * it's value. In this case that company is a piece of property called BTC which offers a total of 21,000,000 shares in all.

Whether this concept is beyond your grasp or not is beside the point. The simple fact of the matter is there are 21,000,000 BTC. Just because someone doesn't own a small portion of them yet doesn't mean they don't exist.

You will not win this, I'm not one of the many ignorant folks who inhabit this forums that eats up other peoples bullshit.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500

For example, someone could sell 0.00000001 BTC for $1 higher than ask price and bang, BTC market cap just increased by $21,000,000.


Actually it would increase by about $15.8 million, and only if nobody else was buying and selling. 

Would you like me to explain it to you, or do you like being wrong?

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
One problem with your theory there is the fact that the altcoins are even more useless than Bitcoin.

Another obvious fact would be that there is $9 Billion worth of Bitcoin and $2 Billion worth of altcoins...so there's no way for altcoins to be the major use for Bitcoin.  There aren't enough altcoins to spend that much Bitcoin on.  Therefore, people are buying Bitcoin mostly for other uses.

You assume that there is $9B worth of BTC but you don't seem to understand that market caps are not accurate nor are they anywhere close to being accurate. They are an estimated worth, nothing more and have no financial ground to stand on.

For example, someone could sell 0.00000001 BTC for $1 higher than ask price and bang, BTC market cap just increased by $21,000,000. You should choose a different approach instead of using fantasy numbers and trying to use them as fact.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
One problem with your theory there is the fact that the altcoins are even more useless than Bitcoin.

Another obvious fact would be that there is $9 Billion worth of Bitcoin and $2 Billion worth of altcoins...so there's no way for altcoins to be the major use for Bitcoin.  There aren't enough altcoins to spend that much Bitcoin on.  Therefore, people are buying Bitcoin mostly for other uses.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
I think it's the opposite, since those altcoins didn't exist until Bitcoin gained value by itself.

Bitcoin is itself an altcoin.. It was not the first and wasn't the last. E-Cash was the first cryptocurrency created by DigiCash and was actually used by banks. BTC didn't come around until 10 years after E-Cash failed.

Without a use for something it is worthless. Altcoins give BTC more of a use than anything else as you need to obtain the BTC used to buy the altcoins. This is basic economics and should easily be understood by anyone who has gone through high school.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
I think it's the opposite, since those altcoins didn't exist until Bitcoin gained value by itself.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Yeah, and a lot of coins depend on 1 person.  But that 1 person will eventually quit no matter what happens.  If he sells his bags, if he swaps to BARR, if he dies, or if he spends the next 10 years dedicated to Biebercoin before he finally gets sick of losing money - the coin will die, one way or another.

As for killing coins to raise the worth of others, it's more than that.  We do want to decrease the overall number of altcoins, but we're preserving the value of the coins we absorb.  So we're not exactly killing them.  Since BARR only comes from burning altcoins, the value of BARR comes from the value of those altcoins.  If you mined Cagecoin for 2 years with a GPU, and then you burn those coins to get BARR, then your GPU earned that BARR for you.  All the work you did (and Proof of Work) survives, because you're basically moving those coins to a new blockchain.

And it's not just to elevate some coins over others - we want to decrease the number of coins so the crypto markets can just survive.  There are only so many people who will put money into crypto, and their money is limited.  When an altcoin dies, that money is destroyed.  It literally destroys capital and takes it out of the crypto ecosystem.  Crypto cannot continue like this, because the money gets spread paper-thin, and then the money just slowly loses its value down to nothing.  It would be like the stock market crashing every month - people would lose their houses, businesses would go under, and the economy would collapse.

 If there were no altcoins, Bitcoin's price would probably be $2000 right now.  But everyone's money is split into a thousand other coins.  And those coins continue to lose value, and they continue to die every day.  And it continues to hurt Bitcoin and crypto in general.

Ethereum raised $18 Million in their pre-sale, and then they held that bitcoin until it was only worth $9 Million.  They lost $9 Million.  Where did that money go?  Nobody got it, but it disappeared.  They lost, but nobody else gained.  And that's what happens to 90% of altcoins, except they never rebound.  Capital destruction led to the Great Depression, and the recent housing market crash, when loans weren't repaid and that money on the books just disappeared.  Coinmarketcap says there's $12 Billion on the markets, including all coins;  how many billions of those dollars are in altcoins that won't survive?  Can the crypto markets afford to lose $1 Billion out of $12 Billion?  I think at least that much will disappear with dying altcoins, and I think it would be enough to ruin the entire industry. 

So half the altcoins just disappear, but the other problem is the ones that keep going, struggling to survive, with people putting more time and money into a losing coin because they already have so much invested in their bags.  With 5 people, a dying coin can limp on forever, taking up room on the markets, trying to get new investors to dump their bags on.  That's why there are 800 coins on Coinmarketcap (after they've already delisted over a thousand).  And out of those 800, you've never heard of about 750 of them. 

So before these altcoins lose all their value, that value can be rescued and transferred into BARR.  Instead of 100 struggling blockchains that barely work, each with 5 users refusing to let go and lose everything, we can give them a way to let go without losing everything.  We can take those 5 users from 100 coins and have 1 coin with 500 users. 
Pages:
Jump to: