Topic: [ANN][CDC] CLOUDCOIN REVIVAL. PoW/PoS. ** LATEST MARCH 2015 OPENSSL FIX ** - page 18. (Read 41382 times)
April 05, 2014, 03:11:11 PM
can not connect to pool
April 05, 2014, 01:30:52 PM
http://forthelulz.no-ip.info/cdcpool/public/index.php?page=gettingstarted
sorry for the late reply
forums are being difficult for some reason
pool is up
sorry for the late reply
forums are being difficult for some reason
pool is up
April 05, 2014, 11:57:59 AM
Some stats for the past 24 hours:
Total blocks generated: 1284
PoS blocks generated: 514 (40% of total)
PoW blocks generated: 772 (60% of total)
400 CDC bonus blocks: 9
900 CDC bonus blocks: 3
4400 CDC bonus blocks: 0
Total PoW minted: 44300 CDC
Not a bad day, fairly high percentage of PoW blocks, with about 53% of the "calculated" average daily mint (which assumes 100% PoW blocks).
Once people mine a bit and start minting PoS blocks (about 9.5 days after PoW) it's going to become a lot more difficult to find PoW blocks, so get mining now.
Total blocks generated: 1284
PoS blocks generated: 514 (40% of total)
PoW blocks generated: 772 (60% of total)
400 CDC bonus blocks: 9
900 CDC bonus blocks: 3
4400 CDC bonus blocks: 0
Total PoW minted: 44300 CDC
Not a bad day, fairly high percentage of PoW blocks, with about 53% of the "calculated" average daily mint (which assumes 100% PoW blocks).
Once people mine a bit and start minting PoS blocks (about 9.5 days after PoW) it's going to become a lot more difficult to find PoW blocks, so get mining now.
April 05, 2014, 11:43:12 AM
Now once bter gets the new client running all will be good...
bter admin has acknowledged my email (human reply, not just the help desk autoresponder). Hopefully he will re-enable deposits soon. I'll give him another poke if nothing has happened in a couple of days.
Pool sounds good. Not sure if it will end up with a bunch of orphans like solo miners do, or whether having a good amount of aggregate hash power will get around that.
April 05, 2014, 10:54:36 AM
Now once bter gets the new client running all will be good...
April 05, 2014, 09:24:30 AM
Syncing blockchain now
Pool is ready.
Will be up after ensuring stratum is stable
Pool is ready.
Will be up after ensuring stratum is stable
April 05, 2014, 08:40:45 AM
yes need a pool please
April 05, 2014, 08:39:59 AM
Would anyone be interested if I were to spin up a pool for this?
April 05, 2014, 08:10:45 AM
dont forget the dev was a scammer he conned me out of around 0.5 BTC (he got the cosmoscoin/realcoin/richcoin/galaxycoin/diamondcoin dev make it through me and he ran with my middle man fee. )
I sympathise with you losing money because of him, but we're moving forward now. He has nothing to do with CDC any more.
April 05, 2014, 07:03:02 AM
dont forget the dev was a scammer he conned me out of around 0.5 BTC (he got the cosmoscoin/realcoin/richcoin/galaxycoin/diamondcoin dev make it through me and he ran with my middle man fee. )
April 04, 2014, 11:32:07 PM
why are you reviving this scamcoin?
Because it still has community support, including an exchange. Once I figured out how to get around the negative retarget bug and get mining working again, without a client update needed, it seemed natural to continue, reviving it properly with a new client release.
I know its history wasn't so great - large premine, original developer using fake accounts as shills to generate interest - but I'm sure we can move past that. It's not dead just yet.
April 04, 2014, 08:32:48 AM
why are you reviving this scamcoin?
April 03, 2014, 07:51:53 PM
needs github+logo+marketing 
then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
+1then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
Have you contacted bter? They are still on the old blockchain.
Yes, I've contacted bter with a link to the new client's source. Hopefully they can get it set up soon.
what does Cloudcoin pay in PoS%? I know alot of coins suffered the negative timestamp bug that caused blockchains to lockup, they were cloned from the CDC source code. Does this new client resolve the issue? Can we also get coin-control as well, its pretty much a must with PoS/PoW hybrid coins. I am glad to see people reviving old blockchains instead of spamming new ones.
Looks like PoS pays a nominal amount around 1% p/a.
The negative retarget bug has been fixed and will apply from block 291253. I did it as a future fork to minimise disruption in the event that we get hit with the bug again before everyone has a chance to update. Note that even after this block it's not necessarily a hard fork; original v1.0 clients on the correct chain will still work just fine, UNLESS/UNTIL there's a neg retarget. If that happens, v1.1 clients will continue to work, while v1.0 clients will break again.
As far as coin control, I know we discussed that in the GRW thread, but that looks to be a fair bit more complex - maybe something for the future. This release was about fixing the serious negative retarget bug, plus minimising the messing around needed to get onto the correct chain.
April 03, 2014, 02:04:44 PM
So far POS seems to be working fine on the new blockchain, no issues like the old one.
April 03, 2014, 01:50:04 PM
what does Cloudcoin pay in PoS%? I know alot of coins suffered the negative timestamp bug that caused blockchains to lockup, they were cloned from the CDC source code. Does this new client resolve the issue? Can we also get coin-control as well, its pretty much a must with PoS/PoW hybrid coins. I am glad to see people reviving old blockchains instead of spamming new ones.
April 03, 2014, 01:30:48 PM
needs github+logo+marketing
then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
+1then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
Have you contacted bter? They are still on the old blockchain.
April 03, 2014, 09:19:45 AM
4400 block found by a lucky miner a few minutes ago. At current rates, that one block is worth around 0.075 BTC.
Working on getting the source on github now.
Working on getting the source on github now.
April 03, 2014, 08:26:51 AM
needs github+logo+marketing
then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
then full steam ahead into the clouds and to the moon
April 03, 2014, 08:24:09 AM
I'm assuming the 1 positive out of the 51 different client checks is a false positive. This EXE was cross compiled using Gitian on a Linux system. The files included in the source will allow anyone with Gitian and a 386-lucid VM to replicate this compile.
Jump to: