I can't wait until the movie "The CraigsCoin Killer" comes out. 
It should be aired today in 3.5 hours if I'm not messing things with time difference up again.
Topic: [ANN][CRAIG] CraigsCoin | CLASSIFIED ADS ON BLOCKCHAIN 5+ POD BITTREX, CRYPTSY - page 141. (Read 257901 times)
September 18, 2014, 08:33:25 AM
It should be aired today in 3.5 hours if I'm not messing things with time difference up again.
September 18, 2014, 08:30:14 AM
I can't wait until the movie "The CraigsCoin Killer" comes out.
September 18, 2014, 08:24:24 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
Why? None of librexcoin-unique features were used. One couldnt even tell that it was froked form that particular coin and not other one.
Why?
Professional courtesy and also a thanks for your help librexcoin guys but we will take it from here.
It also shows proof of roadmap to get where we are now.
Is that a new word por "proof of roadmap"?
I sincerely believe that admitting it here is well enough.
Anyway I think you have a point here, and I will later mention librexcoin somewhere in OP. Probably later today.
Thank you for an advice.
You might get a 6+ POD rating the way you are going. lol
Transparency and honesty is what investors are looking for, so keep up the good work.
September 18, 2014, 08:14:47 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
Why? None of librexcoin-unique features were used. One couldnt even tell that it was froked form that particular coin and not other one.
Why?
Professional courtesy and also a thanks for your help librexcoin guys but we will take it from here.
It also shows proof of roadmap to get where we are now.
Is that a new word por "proof of roadmap"?
I sincerely believe that admitting it here is well enough.
Anyway I think you have a point here, and I will later mention librexcoin somewhere in OP. Probably later today.
Thank you for an advice.
September 18, 2014, 08:07:48 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
Why? None of librexcoin-unique features were used. One couldnt even tell that it was froked form that particular coin and not other one.
Why?
Professional courtesy and also a thanks for your help librexcoin guys but we will take it from here.
It also shows proof of roadmap to get where we are now.
Is that a new word por "proof of roadmap"?
September 18, 2014, 07:52:44 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
Did all of the scrypt forks give credit to Litecoin in their announcements?It is like Ferrari giving credit to the prehistorical being that invented the wheel... Thank you wheelman, Thank you kindly!
September 18, 2014, 07:50:50 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
Why? None of librexcoin-unique features were used. One couldnt even tell that it was froked form that particular coin and not other one.
September 18, 2014, 07:43:57 AM
It might be a good idea to give credit to Librexcoin somewhere in the op.
September 18, 2014, 06:39:14 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
I used librexcoin as basis for the Craigs fork.
Why Librex? Any reason?
No particular reason. Seemed like a good clean source to start with. Anyting about it I should be aware of?
LibrexCoin has proven to be a great coin with a 5+ POD dev. Very good choice
September 18, 2014, 05:48:50 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
I used librexcoin as basis for the Craigs fork.
Why Librex? Any reason?
No particular reason. Seemed like a good clean source to start with. Anyting about it I should be aware of?
Not that I know of. I don't own any, but I did check their wallet out and it seems like they are very competent devs.
I just didn't like the name. I think backing a coin is a lot like backing a racehorse.
September 18, 2014, 05:35:41 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
I used librexcoin as basis for the Craigs fork.
Why Librex? Any reason?
No particular reason. Seemed like a good clean source to start with. Anyting about it I should be aware of?
September 18, 2014, 05:33:09 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
I used librexcoin as basis for the Craigs fork.
Why Librex? Any reason?
September 18, 2014, 03:20:24 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
I used librexcoin as basis for the Craigs fork.
September 18, 2014, 03:17:19 AM
Ok then, what coin was craigscoin forked from? I cant be bothered doing the research
September 18, 2014, 12:07:58 AM
so the price is 100 sats now. Any predictions what price might it be when ICO ends?
The same as whatever initial investors paid. Maybe a little more, maybe a little less.
The ROI won't come until the team delivers a good product that someone wants to invest a lot of money into.
September 17, 2014, 03:19:29 PM
so the price is 100 sats now. Any predictions what price might it be when ICO ends?
The same as whatever initial investors paid. Maybe a little more, maybe a little less.
The ROI won't come until the team delivers a good product that someone wants to invest a lot of money into.
September 17, 2014, 03:11:57 PM
so the price is 100 sats now. Any predictions what the price might it be when ICO ends?
September 17, 2014, 02:02:25 PM
Yes, I do. That's good point! 
September 17, 2014, 01:44:02 PM
I had already bought! Should I buy more?
You might want to wait until the last day and see how many other people are in.
September 17, 2014, 11:09:39 AM
Some code archaeology, for general interest and a short, sharp lesson on greed.
On 31st May 2013, a Litecoin backport introduces some Qt5 compatibility for Mac Dock icon handling: https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/07b32c2cb247244a58e9e481c97e2e5ec2aa4867/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L86
The code includes this comment, unremarkable at the time but which would later act as a tell-tale:
One the 3rd Feb 2014, the change is integrated into MemoryCoin: https://github.com/memorycoin/memorycoin/blob/psforkinit/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L98
The comment text remains unchanged.
On the 7th May 2014, carsenk commits the source for Dreamcoin and, although the code was subsequently expunged from the Dreamcoin repos, I forked a copy at the time and we can see that the comment has now changed:
https://github.com/gjhiggins/dreamcoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L92
The comment testifies to carsenk's crude approach to regexp in that the word “hack” has been regexplaced with “DRM”, making it crystal-clear that DreamCoin was forked from (also-expunged) HackCoin.
On the 9th May 2014, the tell-tale continued to sing its sweet song of betrayal, this time for LibertyCoin: https://github.com/liberty-project/LibertyCoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L92
And boys and girls, if you listen very carefully, you can right now hear the tune filtering out of CraigsCoin:
https://github.com/CraigsCoin/CraigsCoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm
So, be careful out there with those greedy regexps, otherwise you could put someone's eye out.
Cheers
Graham
Edit: corrected URL
On 31st May 2013, a Litecoin backport introduces some Qt5 compatibility for Mac Dock icon handling: https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/07b32c2cb247244a58e9e481c97e2e5ec2aa4867/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L86
The code includes this comment, unremarkable at the time but which would later act as a tell-tale:
Code:
// write temp file hack (could also be done through QIODevice [memory])
One the 3rd Feb 2014, the change is integrated into MemoryCoin: https://github.com/memorycoin/memorycoin/blob/psforkinit/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L98
The comment text remains unchanged.
Code:
// write temp file hack (could also be done through QIODevice [memory])
On the 7th May 2014, carsenk commits the source for Dreamcoin and, although the code was subsequently expunged from the Dreamcoin repos, I forked a copy at the time and we can see that the comment has now changed:
https://github.com/gjhiggins/dreamcoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L92
Code:
// write temp file DRM (could also be done through QIODevice [memory])
The comment testifies to carsenk's crude approach to regexp in that the word “hack” has been regexplaced with “DRM”, making it crystal-clear that DreamCoin was forked from (also-expunged) HackCoin.
On the 9th May 2014, the tell-tale continued to sing its sweet song of betrayal, this time for LibertyCoin: https://github.com/liberty-project/LibertyCoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm#L92
Code:
// write temp file DRM (could also be done through QIODevice [memory])
And boys and girls, if you listen very carefully, you can right now hear the tune filtering out of CraigsCoin:
https://github.com/CraigsCoin/CraigsCoin/blob/master/src/qt/macdockiconhandler.mm
Code:
// write temp file CRAIG (could also be done through QIODevice [memory])
So, be careful out there with those greedy regexps, otherwise you could put someone's eye out.
Cheers
Graham
Edit: corrected URL
I'm puzzled by your research. Is what you implying good or bad? You also was sloppy while digging and missed the coin that CraigsCoin was actually frorked from.
Jump to: