1% will be charity. And 10% will be burn. Now this is interesting. Can someone explain what is the benefit of this 10%burn here?
I can not understand that, why should they burn 10% of profit (because the 30% fee is nothing more than their share of profit)?
This seems to me very strange, maybe it is a translation error?
I believe it’s part of their way to have a deflationary model to decrease supply which raises per token value as part of their fee structure if it works as I believe it does it’s. A great way to gate the burn and drive increased scarcity in the system
I don't think that should be the case; probably there is something missing. I am not sure how investors would react to that to be honest. I think luxcess group have considered several options just hoping to hear their take on this.