Topic: █【ANN】【DAPP】█ 🌟🌟🌟 BLOCKLANCER 🌟🌟🌟 ██ JOIN GIG ECONOMY BOOM - page 188. (Read 136431 times)
I hope with the launch of the platform will begin a new era for freelancing.
From the word itself, blocklancer,,it really sounds awesome and interesting..i will really support this project..
tFrom the word itself, blocklancer,,it really sounds awesome and interesting..i will really support this project..
Hi blocklancer ! I joined the campaign ... goodluck ...
The process of searching and attracting the perspective candidates against the vacancies in an organization is now get an easy task by the effort of Blocklancer team. This team has given a platform for both the hierer and job searcher complete freedom for the transaction of payment also.
Sounds interesting .... looking forward for this big project..
Hi blocklancer ! I joined the campaign ... goodluck ...
From the word itself, blocklancer,,it really sounds awesome and interesting..i will really support this project..
Joined Twitter and Facebook Bounty. Blocklancer username: crypto_fan_boy
Twitter account: https://twitter.com/crypto_fan_boy
Facebook account: https://www.facebook.com/cryptofanboy
for social media bounty you don't need to post here it's not necessary , it's only for signature and translation i think.Twitter account: https://twitter.com/crypto_fan_boy
Facebook account: https://www.facebook.com/cryptofanboy
Freelancer ..a word that is familiar to everyone ..freelancer this is different from the other.i hope blocklancer successful..
joined signature campaing
my id : 708sig
my id : 708sig
Thank you
We are getting bigger and bigger every day!
Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team
and avatar signature sir
Thank you
I'm new here and I just want to thank and wish the team that together we achieve a great success in this great project.
Regards!!!
Regards!!!
joined signature campaing
my id : 708sig
my id : 708sig
Thank you
We are getting bigger and bigger every day!
Kind regards
The Blocklancer Team
joined signature campaing
my id : 708sig
my id : 708sig
I was reading the whitepaper and took a look at the Fig 6 (Client isn't satisfied about the freelancer work).
It seems that if he isn't satisfied, it directly goes to the token holder tribunal.
What if the client do agree that his work isn't sufficient ? What the point of going to the tokens holders tribunal then ?
Can't the client and the freelancer think of a friendly resolution of the matter, with, for example, a reduced salary.
This lead us to my second inquiries.
The token holder tribunal seems too binary to me. Either it decides to give all the funds to the client, either to the freelancer.
Are you planning to improve this system so that the client would only have to pay a given percent of the salary fixed at the start ?
While your platform seems to be viable for $200 jobs, I'm not sure how good it would be for a $10k one.
It seems that if he isn't satisfied, it directly goes to the token holder tribunal.
What if the client do agree that his work isn't sufficient ? What the point of going to the tokens holders tribunal then ?
Can't the client and the freelancer think of a friendly resolution of the matter, with, for example, a reduced salary.
This lead us to my second inquiries.
The token holder tribunal seems too binary to me. Either it decides to give all the funds to the client, either to the freelancer.
Are you planning to improve this system so that the client would only have to pay a given percent of the salary fixed at the start ?
While your platform seems to be viable for $200 jobs, I'm not sure how good it would be for a $10k one.
Hi,
Very good questions
Ad Question 1.) Of course the THT is just activated, if there is a dispute between the client and the freelancer. This is the scenario, where traditional freelancing platforms are failing. If there is no dispute between client and freelancer then there is nothing to decide for the THT.
Ad Question 2.) We discussed that problem quite extensively in our team. We think that you have to consider 2 main things here:
(1) What is satisfaction
We came up with the idea that the satisfaction of the client is a variable and this variable can have certain characteristics. For example the satisfaction can be continous and bounded(0-100), or binary(true/false). If the variable is continous and bounded the client can be 100% satisfied, 0% satisfied or 2.5% satisfied and every number in between is possible. If the variable is binary/boolean then the client is satisfied or is not satisfied. If you look at a real world example to exemplify that. Imagine that a client wants a carpenter to create a chair for him. If the carpenter comes up with a nice chair and the client likes it, the client will pay the carpenter for the chair. This means the client was 100% satisfied. But what happens if the carpenter creates a chair with 3 legs. The satisfaction of the client will not be between 100% and 0%. It will just be 0%. And also a chair with 2 legs, 1 leg or 0 legs will be not satisfieable at all. This should show that satisfaction is not really a continuos function. In most real-world examples satisfaction will boil down to being satisfied or not.
(2) When will the client benefit from the THT
If we design the model in a way that it is possible that the client has to pay just a fraction of the price, it will become extremely attractive for the client to call the THT every time, because the possibility is very high that the THT decides that he has to pay less than the predefined price. Then the fees for calling the THT are much smaller than the savings from paying less.
Regarding your concerns for larger projects: For larger projects the milestone system is build in. This means that the client can split up a big project into separateable chunks of work (milestones or workpackages). Then the freelancer is paid for each workpackage separately. And the THT can decide on the milestones, if they are fullfilled or not. This also has the positive effect that the big project is better structured for the freelancer and the client and the freelancer is not at risk of getting no money at all for a big project. This is also connected to question 2 of course.
I hope that it is now a bit clearer for you
Kind regards
The Blocklancer team
I was reading the whitepaper and took a look at the Fig 6 (Client isn't satisfied about the freelancer work).
It seems that if he isn't satisfied, it directly goes to the token holder tribunal.
What if the client do agree that his work isn't sufficient ? What the point of going to the tokens holders tribunal then ?
Can't the client and the freelancer think of a friendly resolution of the matter, with, for example, a reduced salary.
This lead us to my second inquiries.
The token holder tribunal seems too binary to me. Either it decides to give all the funds to the client, either to the freelancer.
Are you planning to improve this system so that the client would only have to pay a given percent of the salary fixed at the start ?
While your platform seems to be viable for $200 jobs, I'm not sure how good it would be for a $10k one.
It seems that if he isn't satisfied, it directly goes to the token holder tribunal.
What if the client do agree that his work isn't sufficient ? What the point of going to the tokens holders tribunal then ?
Can't the client and the freelancer think of a friendly resolution of the matter, with, for example, a reduced salary.
This lead us to my second inquiries.
The token holder tribunal seems too binary to me. Either it decides to give all the funds to the client, either to the freelancer.
Are you planning to improve this system so that the client would only have to pay a given percent of the salary fixed at the start ?
While your platform seems to be viable for $200 jobs, I'm not sure how good it would be for a $10k one.
Joining in the avatar and personal text my ID is 2396sig
i joined signature
This is my ID number: 745sig
This is my ID number: 745sig
You know, i take part in baunty company of this project from the begining and i want to say thank's to the team, becouse they do all things for their investors on hight level.
Hi,Thanks for the very kind words.
It's really great to receive such a huge support from this community.
Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team
You know, i take part in baunty company of this project from the begining and i want to say thank's to the team, becouse they do all things for their investors on hight level.
just wondering why blocklancer is not mentioned on this? https://cointelegraph.com/ico-calendar or is it yet to be mentioned here https://tokenmarket.net/ico-calendar
Hi,
We negotiated with CoinTelegraph to get listed on their homepage. Unfortunately, they have extremely high charges to get listed on their homepage (min $20,000). Because, we want to avoid doing fishy things like a pre-ico, we do not have the money to do such high payments. We think it is unfair to honest and transparent projects like BLOCKLANCER to have such enormous prices just for a simple listing.
Luckily we have the support of a great community and we think that our community and the great people supporting us are much more precious than a single line in some ico-listing.
Kind regard
The Blocklancer Team
just wondering why blocklancer is not mentioned on this? https://cointelegraph.com/ico-calendar or is it yet to be mentioned here https://tokenmarket.net/ico-calendar
Hi,
We negotiated with CoinTelegraph to get listed on their homepage. Unfortunately, they have extremely high charges to get listed on their homepage (min $20,000). Because, we want to avoid doing fishy things like a pre-ico, we do not have the money to do such high payments. We think it is unfair to honest and transparent projects like BLOCKLANCER to have such enormous prices just for a simple listing.
Luckily we have the support of a great community and we think that our community and the great people supporting us are much more precious than a single line in some ico-listing.
Kind regard
The Blocklancer Team
Thanks for the kind words,
We will make it for sure.
Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team
just wondering why blocklancer is not mentioned on this? https://cointelegraph.com/ico-calendar or is it yet to be mentioned here https://tokenmarket.net/ico-calendar
Hi,
We negotiated with CoinTelegraph to get listed on their homepage. Unfortunately, they have extremely high charges to get listed on their homepage (min $20,000). Because, we want to avoid doing fishy things like a pre-ico, we do not have the money to do such high payments. We think it is unfair to honest and transparent projects like BLOCKLANCER to have such enormous prices just for a simple listing.
Luckily we have the support of a great community and we think that our community and the great people supporting us are much more precious than a single line in some ico-listing.
Kind regard
The Blocklancer Team
Jump to: