It's also a prime example of why obscured blockchains are toast because the rot would still be in there festering and atrophying the integrity of the asset courtesy of a total absence of transparency.
Atrophy is typically caused by lack of activity, not infection. I know you're all worked up into a rage-froth about the market's direction (IE, DASH COLLAPSING), but please don't ham-fistedly misuse SAT words in an attempt to look smart and convincing.
Obfuscated blockchains may be proven to maintain their integrity through the use of zero knowledge proofs.
ZKPs and homomorphic encryption are well known mathematical concepts.
I'm not sure why you keep insisting they are some form of voodoo, and their black magic cannot be trusted.
I guess it's because you're either bad a math, or holding bags of a coin threatened by superior fungibility/privacy.
Your attempts to spread FUD about long-understood algebra and logic don't make increase DASH's appeal, to put it mildly.
Here are two great places to start curing your superstitious fear of analysis-resistant blockchains:
http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/11/zero-knowledge-proofs-illustrated-primer.htmlhttp://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/1710/how-to-construct-encrypted-functions-with-either-public-or-private-dataOh wait, those links are for adults.
Here is one that explains like you are five years old:
https://medium.com/@jinglan/how-to-explain-zero-knowledge-protocols-to-your-average-child-eb49feb4a41dAnalysis resistance is feature, not a bug. That's why Evan was going to (IE was talking about) adding ring signatures to Darkcoin.
