please update your embedded or shared links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0oNO3mbBE8
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1130. (Read 9723748 times)
May 12, 2016, 03:47:27 AM
New Updated Version of "What is Dash" video is out (incl all Subtitles) ,
please update your embedded or shared links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0oNO3mbBE8
please update your embedded or shared links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0oNO3mbBE8
May 11, 2016, 08:00:38 PM
Brave New Books Now Accepting Dash Crypto!
Shop online with Dash here:http://bravenewbookstore.com
https://youtu.be/RvzovzjveTk
Shop online with Dash here:http://bravenewbookstore.com
https://youtu.be/RvzovzjveTk
May 11, 2016, 04:15:36 PM
Polls order book makes it look exceptionally strong on the bid side, it's almost out of sight!
May 11, 2016, 04:13:07 PM
https://twitter.com/newbiumcoin/status/730505537658441729
Global orderbook gathered from 11 markets in 3 currencies on 7 exchanges.
May 11, 2016, 02:32:25 PM
Anyone knows what happened to the BTC38 DASH/CNY market? I know that they wanted to accumulate some Dash first, but quite some time went by now.
May 11, 2016, 02:15:48 PM
May 11, 2016, 01:40:33 PM
0.018 next checkpoint
May 11, 2016, 09:21:26 AM
Breaking out?
Nah, liquidity is way low for that. The increase from 145 to 150 was most probably 1 person buying a couple of masternodes. I wouldn't draw such consequences yet.
Breaking out may happen when there are news, like the delivery of 12.1, integration with Lamassu/Shakepay, etc.
Still, I see lot of work happening under the hood, and I'm very optimistic, but delivery is king
May 11, 2016, 08:48:04 AM
Breaking out?
May 11, 2016, 06:56:01 AM
Does anyone have the autostart script? (masternode)
I have a rebel VPS lol
I have a rebel VPS lol
Hi, found this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12233642
basically make a script and have it run via cron. Works great and keeps your masternode online
May 11, 2016, 06:07:46 AM
Does anyone have the autostart script? (masternode)
I have a rebel VPS lol
I have a rebel VPS lol
May 10, 2016, 10:46:57 PM
New article published by www.dashmasternode.org, would be awesome if you guys could retweet it Here's the article http://dashmasternode.org/alternative-option-investing-slock-its-dao
Done! Here's the article http://dashmasternode.org/alternative-option-investing-slock-its-dao May 10, 2016, 05:33:03 PM
New article published by www.dashmasternode.org, would be awesome if you guys could retweet it Here's the article http://dashmasternode.org/alternative-option-investing-slock-its-dao
Here's the article http://dashmasternode.org/alternative-option-investing-slock-its-dao May 10, 2016, 08:34:55 AM
April 2016 Dash Core Team Monthly Report
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/april-2016-dash-core-team-monthly-report.8913/
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/april-2016-dash-core-team-monthly-report.8913/
May 09, 2016, 09:43:30 PM
...
off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.
Coins have nothing to do with voting. Nothing at all.
Coins may stay safely locked down and votes can still be cast.
These potential security concerns have been solved long ago.
Thanks to Evan, Dash is three steps ahead.
May 09, 2016, 09:31:11 PM
http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in
Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
off-line masternode voting via trezor solves this problem. next.
May 09, 2016, 06:43:15 PM
Seriously, though: Instamine.
Yes, the Instamine is a serious problem for Dash. It scares away people like Tone Vays (if not the low information religious/greedy types).
But the terrible optics aren't the only issue Dash's instamine causes, as the skewed distribution compounds the problem(s) described here:
http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in
Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
Why are you back here - oh thats right - your shitcoin Muner0 is going down the toilet again.....
Dont forget to collect your payment from Risto for that post.
Why are you so afraid of discussing the "Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general" article I posted?
It as written by a crypto/security expert (not me), so your attacks on the messenger (me) don't do anything to deflect the message.
Isn't substantial discussion of real issues a welcome relief from the endless DashSpam cheerleading?
May 09, 2016, 05:49:27 PM
Why are you back here - oh thats right - your shitcoin Muner0 is going down the toilet again.....
Dont forget to collect your payment from Risto for that post.
May 09, 2016, 05:41:26 PM
Seriously, though: Instamine.
Yes, the Instamine is a serious problem for Dash. It scares away people like Tone Vays (if not the low information religious/greedy types).
But the terrible optics aren't the only issue Dash's instamine causes, as the skewed distribution compounds the problem(s) described here:
http://blog.oleganza.com/post/144087873288/problem-with-proof-of-stake-and-coin-voting-in
Quote
Problem with Proof of Stake and “coin voting” in general
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
The problem with “voting by coins” is that most coins do not vote. This leaves a small fraction of UTXO to actually vote which is not representative and highly volatile since anyone risking to use idle keys to a large stash of coins can dramatically affect the voting outcome.
Most coins are locked up well “under matress” with multisig, time locks and possibly even with HSM-controlled keys. Also, pubkeys to long-term stashes do not want to be exposed from under their hashes in order to be better protected against a QC development in the long term.
In other words, most coins that matter, cannot and will not vote.
This leaves only the least important coins to perform voting. Obviously, the result of such voting will be worthless.
May 09, 2016, 04:09:06 PM
Dash World -- First Month Report by GreyGhost and the Vanbex Group:
Originally posted on Dash Forum, published on We Are Dash Nation:
https://www.rebelmouse.com/dashnation/dash-world-first-month-report-1786964347.html
#DashNation #IoM
Originally posted on Dash Forum, published on We Are Dash Nation:
https://www.rebelmouse.com/dashnation/dash-world-first-month-report-1786964347.html
#DashNation #IoM
Jump to: