Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1545. (Read 9723858 times)

lol
travelling in packs as usual
i bet there are 1-2 more trolls coming soon
as they always do

what's the problem with being poor? what percentage of the world's population is poor?..if you have problem with the poor people, then you have problem with the world, if you have problem with the world then you have problem with life itself..there is no rich without the poor so get a hold of yourself..

DSH bytecoin-clone..or dashcoin or dash ....you should be more respectful to the people whom your coin owes its name  

I'm on a simple quest of finding "these guys"....the fishy ones...why are they fishy/shady/.....or ratty    ...what's their plan?

know anything about this?


or this?

You must be projecting. Only a child wouldn't be able to realize the scheme... Here's the formula again:

Giant Instamine + Masternode HYIP POS Scheme = MASTER FRAUD.

Now bow to your cult leaders and puppetmasters Eduffield and Minotaur26 !

 

bla bla blaaaa ....
man is this lame
i can not believe you guys are still bickering around each other
 

lol rekt

Duffield should be on a scam-panel with fellow snakeoil salesmen Dan Metcalf (XC, Blocknet), Josh Garza (Paycoin), and Dan Kaufman (NeuCoin).

I can't wait to see the crowd start chanting "InstaMine! InstaMine! InstaMine!" when the EvoluSham vaporware nonsense starts.

It's rare to see such an open admission of trolling like that.

You need to do a better job of perpetuating your illusion of "protecting" us unwitting investors.  You're not allowed to have fun, because you need to keep up that "oh-so-concerned" facade. This is serious stuff, you know... after all, it's MY money (DASH) you're talking about, not yours.  

Seriously though, what you don't seem to realize is that rich guys will never listen to poor guys because a logical person only ever listens to someone whom he wants to emulate.   So unless an investor wants to become poor, he will completely ignore trolls and follow either his own instincts or the example of those who are more successful than him.

So far, you've demonstrated only ineptitude in the field of investment, based on your admitted holdings of the defunct DSH bytecoin-clone.  It is comical that you expect any investor here to listen to you; you come across as one of those bearded homeless guys on Wall Street holding up a sign of "the end is near!" as successful businessmen pass by.   Some advice: Figure out who your target audience is, then work on your image if you expect to even have a slight chance of convincing anyone.

Daily Altcoin Analysis: Litecoin, Dash, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Peercoin

http://cointelegraph.com/news/115762/daily-altcoin-analysis-litecoin-dash-dogecoin-etherium-peercoin

I think I must disappoint you... I can't find a DASH presentation in the schedule: http://www.labitconf.com/#schedule
The only thing I can find is a panel discussion (16:00-16:45) on dec 5:

Ok so I mistaken. He's the main troll then. Thanks for clarifying, tok

I don't think he is 'the main dev'.

Monero doesn't have a 'main dev'. It has a...

Yep, the idea was to freeze v12.0 in some stable state (which we hopefully achieved) and release new fixes and improvements (as well as merge latest commits from Bitcoin 0.10) in v12.1 somewhere before v13. v12.1 still require more work to be done (still having issues with locks sometimes) and community testing before launch for sure (few important things changed there including tx creation and budgeting rpc) so not going to happen very soon imo. Moreover we are mostly concentrated on developing ideas and implementation of v13 now.

Make me wondering myself too. Why does Monero main dev spend too much time trolling on another coin's thread ? Does he have nothing to do at all ? I mean his job should be 'coding', isn't it ?

well they have been successful in keeping this thread bumped for us  
they need to put a DASH add in their sig so i can tip them... never mind, i have almost all of them on ignore.

OK Evan.

DASH is a shit clone with an added fraud instamine and other badly implemented features because your dev team barely understands what they're doing. Essentially you're spaghetti coding your way to whatever "cool features" are in fashion this month.

Keep looking at market cap.. an especially useless metric in a coin whose Dev team instamined 30% of the current supply and locked the coins into a HYIP masternode POS scheme.

Fraud + Masternode = MASTER FRAUD. Congratulations

Dash

Great level headed response, as usual.  Thanks Minotaur! and UdjinM6 and dEBRUYNE

In case the corresponding Bitcoin branch is 0.10, this probably gives the best and most fair comparison:



Also: "Showing  300 changed files  with 5,718 additions and 3,542 deletions."

Thank you for the correction. That seems an impressive number, and indeed somewhat an indication of a lot of development work being done that is independent of Bitcoin. If you look back in the actual commits there were indeed many commits for clean ups, tweaks, etc., especially during the summer (around the time of the version 12 release), so the 2000 number seems to pass a quick reality check.
 
Are you no longer merging new Bitcoin commits, or is it planned to freeze for a while and then catch up at some point?

This comparison is pretty much meaningless imo but in case you want to continue it's better to compare similar branches. For Dash corresponding Bitcoin branch is 0.10, not master.



So difference is somewhere around 2100 commits currently

Even this isn't a great means of comparing since one can space out code in longer lines vs consolidating. I doubt there is a great method of comparing...

It's not apples and organes necessarily. Monero has had some massive commits and new features where work has been done from scratch then added in one commit, including deterministic wallets, the embedded database, encrypted payment IDs, replacement of the RPC subsystem with 0MQ IPC, etc. Those are in addition to improvements and clean up to preexisting code (including preexisting code that was itself previously added by Monero)

I don't really know the best way to measure these things -- I guess different measurements are useful for different purposes -- but when someone posts a comparison of number of commits in Dash compared to another project, then it is important to consider how many of the claimed number of commits actually represent the work of the Dash project and not just the commits that are common to 1000 Bitcoin forks. That number alone may not be the best indication of progress, but at least it is an indication of work being done by Dash.


Indeed, I suggested also looking that metric. And I wasn't even necessarily comparing myself (though I was replying to a comparison) as much as asking about metrics of the actual Dash project work. These sorts of metrics have been published for Monero (for example in our 2014 year-in-review, though that is now quite out of date of course), but I haven't seen them for Dash. Historical metrics would be interesting as well, for example the number of lines of code associated with each of the identified features you mentioned above.