Actually, I'm a small investor here, but isn't Peter Todd's comment relevant? The implication is that he doesn't see this as worth his time and that anon doesn't work.
Could someone explain that a bit for me *without just dismissing it*?
Where was the quote? I only *think* I remember it. Anyway, the anonymity in DASH is very strong, not 100%, but strong. Mostly it's private. No one can trace back funds you send to the rest of your wallet, see what your balance is, or anything. Only the merchant, and whomever the merchant gives the information to, will know you paid that merchant funds from an account number, but where those funds came from originally can not be known for certain. Not until all 3 sets of coins (all in the same denominations) are spent and can be verified whom they belong to.
But with each round of mixing you do, it becomes harder and harder to follow the coins, even if they are spent. There is a chart somewhere, but basically, it's impossible to follow coins that have 8 rounds of mixing.
The neat thing about this system, aside from being pretty close to 100% anonymous, is that you can still see these coins, and where they came from and account for each one via the block chain. Nothing is hidden on the block chain except the likelyhood of who owns which exact coin (like dollars, they have a pedigree, or "serial number" via their TXID, but are completely interchangeable and untraceable.) This is in contrast to many of the coins out there which obfuscate the block chain in order to achieve anonymity.
Anyone that takes the time to look at DASH, ask questions and sees what this team has done, would never say it wasn't worth their time, except for the paid trolls who spew lies and misinformation on this thread constantly. And those who are so blinded with loyalty to Bitcoin, that they will not entertain the idea another coin could be doing everything better and more in the spirit of Satoshi Nakamoto.
I'm extremely loyal to DASH, just so you know, but I also know of and have taken the time to learn how other coins work. And although I get their names mixed up, I haven't seen any other solution that is as eloquent as DASH and yet is still compatible with Bitcoin, and can integrate with the same infrastructure already built for Bitcoin.
So as I understand it, Mr. Todd isn't interested in anything except being blindly loyal to Bitcoin, and if we were all like that, this technology would die. Fortunately, greater minds, such as Kristov Atlas and Andreas Antonopoulos and many others I've heard talk, understand the importance of alt coins and innovation. Me? I'm watching a couple as well that I find interesting and am rooting for. But none of them compete with DASH because nothing works like DASH except clones, and why bother with a clone? It's our development team that really makes DASH. And with our new ability to pay developers and marketing campaigns and anything else the community wants to have built, directly from the blockchain, well........... nothing can stop DASH now unless our technology is truly not wanted, which I can't imagine. It's the perfect digital currency with the most perfect decentralized infrastructure I can imagine. If better ideas come along, I'm sure our team will be able to implement them faster than any other team out there.
Ok, I'll stop ranting. As you can tell, I'm passionate about DASH. It gives me hope for the future of the world, as melodramatic as that sounds ;P
PS, If he is the guy that said it's just faulty coin join, first proposed by G. Maxwell, well it's not. It is different in that all the funds are in the same denominations, like mixing only $5 bills, then $10 bills, etc, then handing them back out. Plus, there are always 3 participants, and finally, all this is done as many times as you like, the more participants and rounds of mixing the better, and it's all done prior to need. That is, by the time you want to spend your coins, they should already be mixed.
This goes even deeper. The masternode system, how it works to ensure it is well distributed, and protected against spying or any individual or group of nodes knowing enough information to figure out what's what, etc... the infrastructure has matured so much that these kinds of attacks are simply not possible.