Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2092. (Read 9723782 times)

legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Here is a shareable link to a Dash Overview i made with Google Spreadsheets :

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sk5FG_co27XdaXX9a9t-UL7rAnZ6Itsx-8JKNlzDEEA/edit#gid=0

It takes data from two masternodes i selected randomly (not my own masternodes) and the purchase history is also not real (fictive).
Change cel A1 and H1 within sheet tab ''MN data'' to have it reflect your own masternodes.
The colors of cells in column F and some other columns turn red or blue due to two conditionally formatting rules (text contain - is red, text not contain - is blue).
The colors of cells in colom G8-11 turn red or blue due to two conditionally formatting rules with custom formule (=G11F3 for red)

Feel free to take a peek.
 
edit 1 : make sure the formula's are left intact when trying to copy and adjust the formula's accordingly if you are adding more lines in the spreadsheet.
edit 2 : everyone can now freely make a copy of the whole spreadsheet as long as your logged into your google account.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
Did you guys see this article against the block limit increase by Bram Cohen, I thought it was really interesting. And it seems the debate around this issue continues. Is a good read

https://medium.com/@bramcohen/bitcoin-s-ironic-crisis-32226a85e39f

The comments on reddit are interesting too:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3apulu/bram_cohen_bitcoins_ironic_crisis/
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Through this https://bitinfocharts.com/darkcoin/

I found that the rewards per block was increased up to 8.38 Dash.

Anyone please explain me:

Does it means the fewer miners the higher rewards per block? And how about max coins? Will the max coins can be much more higher than 22 millions Dashs?

Thank you,

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
^^
All should be ok now.
Problem with ref. Node (was down), it has been restarted.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
he always hacks the mn payments. he's probably found a exploit in the new  testnet release and is running it on mainnet. Sad
i got paid 2 days in a row when it's usually 4-5 days between payments.  Grin

One of my nodes was payed ahead of time to the MN address instead of the donation address.
He/she found a way to bypass the reference node.
Fortunately there will be no more reference node in the next version  Smiley

Same happened to me. The hell of it is that node has been down for a couple of weeks now!
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
This Exchange: http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/btc38/
is trading CNY to altcoins for more than million dollars daily...

What is the reason they don't list DASH?

do not trust chinese exchanges
as they have no trading fees their volumes are all BS
or they decided to do another PnD as done before

Yeah in the recent debate between Changpeng Zhao and OKCoin, he confirmed OKCoin was faking volumes. It leads you to think that the smaller altcoin exchanges which are less structured could easily do the same thing and also manipulate pricing. For example, Bter.com was discovered faking trades in their platform for a pump and dump last year.

So always take those trades with a grain of salt,  I think it also has to do with the mining they control. For example, you can merge mine dogecoin with LTC and thus the Dogecoins cost you very little, Chinese are controlling that now and is basically an speculation instrument. IF you check 80% of Doge volume is coming from BTC38. You think why only there? Why not anywhere else? The answer is they are either faking volume or controlling the market. That is my feeling anyway.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
This Exchange: http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/btc38/
is trading CNY to altcoins for more than million dollars daily...

What is the reason they don't list DASH?

I opened a ticket with their service desk the other day and asked:
Myself: Hmmm... I was hoping to trade Dash/CNY but I cannot find that pair listed on your exchange

To which they replied:
service staff 小梅: Thank you for your information. Our colleague will study this coin. If necessary, we will contact you. Thank you again and a nice day~:

I tweeted something similar to them as well.  Maybe if they receive a deluge of inquiries, they'll get the idea.
(After all, squeaky wheel gets the grease)

full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
This Exchange: http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/btc38/
is trading CNY to altcoins for more than million dollars daily...

What is the reason they don't list DASH?

Have they listed any X11 coin?
The reason is "ASICS".
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1023
This Exchange: http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/btc38/
is trading CNY to altcoins for more than million dollars daily...

What is the reason they don't list DASH?

do not trust chinese exchanges
as they have no trading fees their volumes are all BS
or they decided to do another PnD as done before
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1010
This Exchange: http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/btc38/
is trading CNY to altcoins for more than million dollars daily...

What is the reason they don't list DASH?
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
I'm surprised at myself today as I bought a few free DASH Cheesy

Apparently there is an altcoin called CLAMS which has distributed coins based on who held BTC, LTC and DOGE on their respective blockchains, back in May '14.

So if one had BTCs, LTCs or DOGEs in their wallets 13 months ago, they can use the same keys to get CLAM. It gives 4.6 CLAM per address that had eligible amounts of bitcoins/litecoins/dogecoins... so it can add up to quite a lot (it's around 1.5$ per CLAM).

To be 100% sure, move your BTCs/LTCs/DOGEs to other wallets, before importing the old wallets to CLAM, just in case it is some kind of scam or something.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188

The sell side does seem somewhat exhausted.

Lots of new development not yet priced in (Everything since February).
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages
... a massive breakout  Smiley
I can feel it...like a bird can feel an oncoming storm.. Cheesy

And like the elephant can sense the incoming tsunami,
breaking it's human shackles and running up the mountain well in advance while rescuing a kid with it's trunk on the way ...  Grin
hero member
Activity: 655
Merit: 500
... a massive breakout  Smiley
I can feel it...like a bird can feel an oncoming storm.. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1052
Merit: 1004
http://bitcoingarden.tk/forum/index.php?topic=3617.msg93590#msg93590

Quote
We've launched the service that helps to accept cryptocurrency at your online store! It's version 0.1 for now.
Now it takes only few minutes to integrate acception of Bitcoin, Litecoin, DASH and Dogecoin at any website.
hero member
Activity: 655
Merit: 500
Why is it so low volatility on DASH?
Because various:
-real chance to get a place into world, crypto space
-ATM just formed a new floor. The sellers are exhausted, and the buyers are waiting...always the same: the price exploding to start to buy! LOL
legendary
Activity: 1052
Merit: 1004
Why is it so low volatility on DASH?

Pressure buildup for a massive breakout?  Smiley
full member
Activity: 185
Merit: 100
Why is it so low volatility on DASH?
hero member
Activity: 655
Merit: 500
...One of my nodes was payed ... to the MN address instead of the donation address.
...
Same here, two of mine...
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
he always hacks the mn payments. he's probably found a exploit in the new  testnet release and is running it on mainnet. Sad
i got paid 2 days in a row when it's usually 4-5 days between payments.  Grin

One of my nodes was payed ahead of time to the MN address instead of the donation address.
He/she found a way to bypass the reference node.
Fortunately there will be no more reference node in the next version  Smiley

Ah okay. We have the same problem.
The problem is with the fake one payment. He can fake the whole tx-out.
Edit....
The problem is variable "payee". The string is compared incorrect. (main.cpp)

Received   14,675.34953991 DASH  
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/address.dws?XxDotRpSDzgyAkx3jHkLZD8YYZRwbcjmmA.htm



The Dev Team is aware of the situation and i also mentioned to them the problem you found with variable "payee" (the string is compared incorrect. (main.cpp) )
Thanks for your post, its appreciated.


Thanks..
I've add this...main.cpp 2763

 
Code:
if (!fIsInitialDownload && pindex != NULL)
                {
                    bool foundPaymentAmount = false;
                    bool foundPayee = false;
                    bool foundPaymentAndPayee = false;
CScript payee;
                    if(!masternodePayments.GetBlockPayee(chainActive.Tip()->nHeight+1, payee) || payee == CScript()){
//////////////////////  Limxdev 02.06.2015
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// Check for duplicate
uint256 hash = block.GetHash();
//if (mapBlockIndex.count(hash))
//return state.Invalid(error("AcceptBlock() : block already in mapBlockIndex"), 0, "duplicate");
// Get prev block index
CBlockIndex* pindexPrev = NULL;
int nHeight = 0;
if (hash != Params().HashGenesisBlock()) {
map::iterator mi = mapBlockIndex.find(block.hashPrevBlock);
//if (mi == mapBlockIndex.end())
//return state.DoS(10, error("AcceptBlock() : prev block not found"), 0, "bad-prevblk");
pindexPrev = (*mi).second;
nHeight = pindexPrev->nHeight+1;

////////////////////////// nheight Funktion Ende
                        foundPayee = true; //doesn't require a specific payee
                        foundPaymentAmount = true;
if (nHeight >= 99000){
//Limxdev 31-05-2015 Limx proof of payment
int64_t sollreward = 1000000000;
int64_t blockpowreward = 4900000000;// + nFees; later
int64_t maxsumm = 5900000000;// + nFees; later
int64_t maxsumm2 = hardblockpowreward + masternodePaymentAmount;
if(hardblockpowreward >= 4000000000 && masternodePaymentAmount >= sollreward && blockpowreward > hardblockpowreward && maxsumm > maxsumm2) //write by Limxdev 02-06-2015
                            foundPaymentAndPayee = true;

                        LogPrintf("## Limx proof of payment ## CheckBlock() : Using non-specific masternode payments %d\n", chainActive.Tip()->nHeight+1);
} else
{
if (nHeight < 97250) LogPrintf("Disable## Limx proof of payment activate 97250 ## nHeight = %d\n", nHeight);
foundPaymentAndPayee = true;
}
                    }

He broke it in 5 days.  Smiley He has shared his payments and set the masternodepayment in the right tx out array.

Regards

okay, i forwarded that info to Evan Eduffield as well on the Dashtalk forum .. thanks
Jump to: