Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2623. (Read 9723748 times)
March 20, 2015, 06:50:15 AM
I believe the first drop actually ties with the 20,000 dump from that gambling site. Only a fraction of that was actual sell pressure from the rebrand. Inconvenient timing though.
March 20, 2015, 06:48:24 AM
March 20, 2015, 06:44:05 AM
Of course everything in between can happen. The fact there's no other crypto using that name is in their favour (and the Dashcoin business does not bother me one bit - it was a dead project) plus most cryptos don't even have a trademark in the first place. The vast majority of commercial businesses trade without a registered trademark, so it may just end up a non-issue.
So remain DRK. Dashcoin was and still alive.statements like this smells like misinformation
Statements like this from new accounts smells like trolling...
March 20, 2015, 06:34:33 AM
when we touch 0.02 icebreaker will kill him self, cause monero is back to 0.001
March 20, 2015, 06:32:38 AM
The consistent trolling of this project has resulted in some interesting mathematical relationships in markets.
Maybe trolls can do maths....
March 20, 2015, 06:28:05 AM
Of course everything in between can happen. The fact there's no other crypto using that name is in their favour (and the Dashcoin business does not bother me one bit - it was a dead project) plus most cryptos don't even have a trademark in the first place. The vast majority of commercial businesses trade without a registered trademark, so it may just end up a non-issue.
So remain DRK. Dashcoin was and still alive.statements like this smells like misinformation
Statements like this from new accounts smells like trolling...
March 20, 2015, 06:23:44 AM
Of course everything in between can happen. The fact there's no other crypto using that name is in their favour (and the Dashcoin business does not bother me one bit - it was a dead project) plus most cryptos don't even have a trademark in the first place. The vast majority of commercial businesses trade without a registered trademark, so it may just end up a non-issue.
So remain DRK. Dashcoin was and still alive.statements like this smells like misinformation
March 20, 2015, 06:08:53 AM
So did we ever find out if Vertoe who left here is the same verto from EVO? I know he/she/it was into the darkmarkets... or is this just a case of somebody using an extremely similar alias?
vertoe is a "he".
There is no point in exploring that angle. No one knows for sure, but I highly doubt it.
vertoe (apparently) is a known activist for NGO's. He is a highly talented dev. Why on earth would he use a clearnet nickname so similar to a darknet market? Specially if you're the Admin?
That would be the ultimate brainless, stupid, moronic, foot-in-the-bucket thing to do.
March 20, 2015, 06:06:38 AM
Can't imagine how I could get through my life every day if I had to blow every little issue out of proportion.
That was a little low key.
Fixed it for you
March 20, 2015, 06:02:09 AM
It would be idiotic to close or moderate this thread due to a couple of narcissistic sadists.
March 20, 2015, 06:01:51 AM
So did we ever find out if Vertoe who left here is the same verto from EVO? I know he/she/it was into the darkmarkets... or is this just a case of somebody using an extremely similar alias?
March 20, 2015, 05:59:56 AM
I'm sure how you can see the optics of such a situation are less than ideal (to put it nicely). 
Scraping the barrel for substance I think.
The word "intellectual dishonesty" is a term associated with analytical appraisals, not marketing identities.
The rest of your post is basically an attempt at a bit of "intellectual dishonesty" of your own in the true sense of the term which amounts to a load of mud slinging in the hope that some of it might stick.
Sorry, but it isn't and the reason it isn't is because your part of a but hurt little cult yourself that's rattling around in a can and running out of toys to throw out of its pram.
March 20, 2015, 05:56:38 AM
And what a healthy rise I must say
March 20, 2015, 05:54:19 AM
March 20, 2015, 05:52:43 AM
Some of us are having loads of fun!
I must say I think most of the stuff you post is just thinly veiled discomfort [...]
He is doing this because he wants to protect his investment. Monero being a "substitute" coin, he thinks that by degrading the image of DASH he will help to increase the demand for it. Therefore, he will not stop if you try to find a middleground or because you are nice to him.
March 20, 2015, 05:39:25 AM
Can't imagine how I could get through my life every day if I had to blow every little issue out of proportion.
March 20, 2015, 05:38:53 AM
"cultism" in this thread that's partly due to the amount of mindless trolling that's gone on since the last price rise
I don't closely follow the price of DRK, especially as XMR has been on a distracting near 300% rise in the last month.
The rebranding fiasco and its involvement with another CryptoNote coin is what got my attention.
The intellectual dishonesty of the insta-rebrand bothers me. If something isn't broken, you don't fix it.
Your Dear Dark-cum-Dash Cult Leader 'fixed' the name of his one-man hobby project, which is functionally an admission that the Dark brand was broken.
But...we've been hearing since forever ago that Dark is a swell, amazing brand and not shady AT ALL. After all, you have to click-through an agreement disavowing using it for anything naughty (just like with uTorrent Grin Grin Grin).
The kids who thought Dark was a swell amazing not shady AT ALL brand were blindsided when Mr. Dark-cum-Dash suddenly informs them what they believed and invested in was, in fact, actually broken and HELLA SHADY all along.
Combined with the instamine and remote killswitch, a pattern and practice of shadiness results.
When these points are brought up in the relevant thread, those who hope to gain unusually high yields from their investment products go bonkers and start talking about bounties, Old West style justice, etc.
I'm sure how you can see the optics of such a situation are less than ideal (to put it nicely). Smiley
troll alert.
Don't you have some threads to clog with spam posts for your crummy little pool?
Or did BadBear tell you to knock off the repetitive advertisement?
March 20, 2015, 05:38:43 AM
fyi iCEBREAKER is part of the hashfast-scam that went on 2013/14.
Icebreaker is just a grade A IceHole with a huge chip on his shoulder.
While being an icehole, in itself.. is annoying but not technically against the rules... the way he goes about his attacks, bullying, baiting and harassment of people and companies.. and then complains when it finally happens to him... is really immature. it wouldnt shock me if he was just a kid (or very immature kidult)
While being an icehole, in itself.. is annoying but not technically against the rules... the way he goes about his attacks, bullying, baiting and harassment of people and companies.. and then complains when it finally happens to him... is really immature. it wouldnt shock me if he was just a kid (or very immature kidult)
Not off topic at all, you are a known bully and hypocrite. Famous to troll any competitor's thread, your investments come first right ?
bump
March 20, 2015, 05:28:21 AM
I must say I think most of the stuff you post is just thinly veiled discomfort with what you say is "cultism" in this thread. In fact, that's partly due to the amount of mindless trolling that's gone on since the last price rise. It isn't the 'fanboyism' that sticks in people's gullet, it's the valuation because when that wasn't there nobody bothered.
Quite honestly neither is true. The only thing that brought me over to post on this thread was the arrogant stomping on dashcoin (maybe not the substance of the actual deal that was made, but certainly some of the hostile and tone deaf posts from darkcoin supporters) that I saw on their thread, which I happened to have followed for the past six months or so.
I've never been a fan of the launch, instamine, etc., nor the technology but I never bothered to comment on it much either, certainly not on this thread, regardless of price rises (this year or last year).
The dismissive response you give, that criticism aries not from disagreement or disapproval on substance but out of about jealousy and in response to price rises is both incorrect and just adding more fuel to the arrogant, tone deaf, and cultish vibe that people get form you guys. Probably best you drop that one.
March 20, 2015, 05:27:58 AM
"cultism" in this thread that's partly due to the amount of mindless trolling that's gone on since the last price rise
troll alert.
Jump to: