...But what I guarantee you 100% is that...
how are you going to guarantee an opinion by 100%? and you sold most of your dark so how does that look right now at this juncture when you talk about 'business acumen' lol???
My opinion is based upon years of experience. The business world is littered with the charred carcases of companies with excellent technology buy no business acumen. Darkcoin should have brought in someone with substantial business experience many months ago to head things up and improve every important process.
As I said, I still very much believe in Darkcoin technology and Evan as a developer. But the risk at this juncture is far too high for me to invest any substantial capital. Only a business executive I can trust will turn things around would change that. It's time for Darkcoin to grow up. If the correct moves aren't made, it never will.
i think we have completely opposite opinions - To me the rebrand is dark growing up and getting their business hat on... each to their own
I agree that rebranding is/was important and I anticipated it happening at some point. It's how it has been handled that showcases a 5 year old is trying to drive a bulldozer through downtown. Experienced drivers are needed.
my metrics for success of rebrand would be how quickly it's done and how any short term 'shock factor' damage is minimized - price, team and masternode count are almost the same and it is being done quick, so pass with flying colors in my book
If you have a protracted legal battle and you end up losing, how did that rebranding go? If the developer isn't able to concentrate on coding because they are thinking about the legal issues, how did that rebranding go? If you have to spend a boatload of money on that legal battle, how did that rebranding go?