Last time I'll say it...although there have been new buys recently...price would tumble if not for the massive buy wall.
Wow. How to look a gift horse in the mouth !
Do you realise how many projects would die to have a unique enough proposition to attract whales to their markets such as Darkcoin has done ?
So you're saying that somehow "diminishes" the validity of the valuation rather than endorses it ? I'd be interested in discovering the logic behind that conclusion.
Also I don't agree with you that "price would tumble if not for the massive buy wall". I've seen loads of massive buywalls sold into and destroyed because the market did not agree with the buyer. The wall was there well before the launch of InstantX at which point a revaluation kicked off which had to be chased by the entire market including that 25,000 wall.
A buywall works both ways. Remember that a majority (80% to 90%?) of the coin supply is not being traded. For large holders it's usually impossible to liquidate their holdings at the market price. A buywall that size so close to the trading level is a golden opportunity for anyone that wants to realise their holdings or part-holdings. Yet nobody's biting for weeks. Sure there are nibblers but no big cash out despite the golden invitation.
What that tells you is that - if anything - the project is undervalued. Most holders place a higher value on the asset than the current cash-out potential.
***********
P.S. You might be confusing markets with democracy. In democracy it's 1 person 1 vote. In markets it's 1 dollar 1 vote. So if you get somebody coming along with a pile of dollars = that's who you want on your side, not the hundred people with no dollars.