[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2966.

Kai Proctor

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000

Quote from: Minotaur26 on February 15, 2015, 04:22:32 PM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 04:16:38 PM

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 10:30:55 AM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

So you will await the outcome of someone's review - await it for what? So you will decide what to do with your shadow coins? What happens if he says shadowsend is almost as good as ducknote, will you dump shadow and buy ducknote?

Quote from: dewdeded on February 15, 2015, 10:32:11 AM

Who is Zeuner?

Can you stop with the advertising please. It only pushes people away from your asset and is honestly tiring. You seem to spend a lot of time here lately.

He's trying to ride on Darkcoin's wave. That's sad Undecided

xxxgoodgirls

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1001

Man this is censorship.

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Minotaur26 on February 15, 2015, 04:22:32 PM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 04:16:38 PM

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 10:30:55 AM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

I will await the outcome of the Zeuner peer review of shadowsend v2.

Isidor has undertaken to also compare/contrast SSv2 with other anon systems, including yours (DRK MN's). The report should be illuminating for all.

So you will await the outcome of someone's review - await it for what? So you will decide what to do with your shadow coins? What happens if he says shadowsend is almost as good as ducknote, will you dump shadow and buy ducknote?

Quote from: dewdeded on February 15, 2015, 10:32:11 AM

Who is Zeuner?

By all accounts Isidor Zeuner is a gifted cryptographer who's reputation precedes him. He has worked with BTC COre Devs and he is above reproach.

He is writing a peer review for ShadowSend v2 and will additionally contrast it to other anon architectures in this space (including DRK). This is not a code review but rather a review of cryptographic architectures.

I will be fascinated to learn how he compares DRK's two-tier MN architecture with Shadows bleeding-edge Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge Proofs implementation.

Ultimately the Shadow community has done a favor to the entire altcoin community by commissioning this review and it is quite possible Isidor will come out in your favor (bear in mind tho that SDC Team specifically asked for a compare/comtrast)

Gavin Andresen spoke about NIZKPs in DEV Core 2015
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3INbCnEfZq4

With Respect illodin
Even if Isidor finds an issue with Shadow I have complete confidence that rynomaster and technovert will fix it as the consummate professionals they are.

p.s. Mixing 7000BTC of DRK might take a while.

Can you stop with the advertising please. It only pushes people away from your asset and is honestly tiring. You seem to spend a lot of time here lately.

I felt it was only fair to appraise the DRK community about this upcoming review since it might send a few shock waves when released.

Isidor will give an honest analysis. Maybe he'll prefer DRK.

As I said the commissioned review will IMHO benefit the entire altcoin scene.

Don't shoot the messenger.

If you want me to vanish into the Shadows you know what to do. Change your sigs.
Had Honest Tim done so 72 hrs ago (when I first requested politely) I would have left this thread already.

BrainShutdown

legendary

Activity: 1052

Merit: 1004

Quote from: bigrcanada on February 15, 2015, 04:32:51 PM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 04:16:38 PM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

blah blah blah

blah blah

blah blah blah!

I and I'm sure I can speak for most here have had enough of your BS! Your now officially on my ignore list...and I'm sure many more will be doing so as well. Your spamming our thread and it is NOT wanted. Please stop and/or leave! Thanks.

I guess you were the last one to put him on ignore Tongue

anonymousxx1503

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: dewdeded on February 15, 2015, 04:45:33 PM

Quote from: G2M on February 15, 2015, 04:11:14 PM

"More decentralized than bitcoin" is a legitimate advertising point?

https://blockchain.info/connected-nodes

vs.

https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/nodes-active/ shows 6333 Full Nodes for Bitcoin.

Unfortunately we can't really touch Bitcoin on that stat gievn that we can't have more than 5000 something masternodes with the current number of coins and that would mean no coins available for trade and is never gonna happen Tongue

dewdeded

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1011

Monero Evangelist

Quote from: G2M on February 15, 2015, 04:11:14 PM

"More decentralized than bitcoin" is a legitimate advertising point?

https://blockchain.info/connected-nodes

vs.

https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/nodes-active/ shows 6333 Full Nodes for Bitcoin.

bigrcanada

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 04:16:38 PM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

blah blah blah

blah blah

blah blah blah!

I and I'm sure I can speak for most here have had enough of your BS! Your now officially on my ignore list...and I'm sure many more will be doing so as well. Your spamming our thread and it is NOT wanted. Please stop and/or leave! Thanks.

Sub-Ether

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages

Wow! lots of action, this amateur day trader was going to go to bed early lol, well I sold a little at .0121, you can laugh at me if it keeps going up Grin

Does anyone know if Otoh is up yet Wink

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

Quote from: UdjinM6 on February 15, 2015, 04:22:59 PM

Quote from: qwizzie on February 15, 2015, 03:53:15 PM

Quote from: eduffield on February 15, 2015, 12:56:16 PM

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks

edit : now dont you all get distracted .. look at above and beyond that cleavage

lol bootstrap, qwizzie, not boobs_trap Grin

edit : well, you all certainly looked at them more than once .. by now
edit : eh, those two error messages from Evan i mean

BrainShutdown

legendary

Activity: 1052

Merit: 1004

Quote from: pille on February 15, 2015, 04:11:17 PM

Quote from: BrainShutdown on February 15, 2015, 03:48:23 PM

Booom

I cant read charts, can you explain please? I interpret it like "north is the direction again"? Tongue

Me neither but downtrend resistance has been broken so I guess your interpretation is correct Wink

UdjinM6

legendary

Activity: 1318

Merit: 1040

Quote from: qwizzie on February 15, 2015, 03:53:15 PM

Quote from: eduffield on February 15, 2015, 12:56:16 PM

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks

edit : now dont you all get distracted .. look at above and beyond that cleavage

lol bootstrap, qwizzie, not boobs_trap Grin

Minotaur26

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 04:16:38 PM

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 10:30:55 AM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

I will await the outcome of the Zeuner peer review of shadowsend v2.

Isidor has undertaken to also compare/contrast SSv2 with other anon systems, including yours (DRK MN's). The report should be illuminating for all.

So you will await the outcome of someone's review - await it for what? So you will decide what to do with your shadow coins? What happens if he says shadowsend is almost as good as ducknote, will you dump shadow and buy ducknote?

Quote from: dewdeded on February 15, 2015, 10:32:11 AM

Who is Zeuner?

By all accounts Isidor Zeuner is a gifted cryptographer who's reputation precedes him. He has worked with BTC COre Devs and he is above reproach.

He is writing a peer review for ShadowSend v2 and will additionally contrast it to other anon architectures in this space (including DRK). This is not a code review but rather a review of cryptographic architectures.

I will be fascinated to learn how he compares DRK's two-tier MN architecture with Shadows bleeding-edge Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge Proofs implementation.

Ultimately the Shadow community has done a favor to the entire altcoin community by commissioning this review and it is quite possible Isidor will come out in your favor (bear in mind tho that SDC Team specifically asked for a compare/comtrast)

Gavin Andresen spoke about NIZKPs in DEV Core 2015
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3INbCnEfZq4

With Respect illodin
Even if Isidor finds an issue with Shadow I have complete confidence that rynomaster and technovert will fix it as the consummate professionals they are.

p.s. Mixing 7000BTC of DRK might take a while.

Can you stop with the advertising please. It only pushes people away from your asset and is honestly tiring. You seem to spend a lot of time here lately.

zombie6

sr. member

Activity: 438

Merit: 250

sounds like cloakcoin to me

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 10:30:55 AM

Quote from: child_harold on February 15, 2015, 05:39:10 AM

I will await the outcome of the Zeuner peer review of shadowsend v2.

Isidor has undertaken to also compare/contrast SSv2 with other anon systems, including yours (DRK MN's). The report should be illuminating for all.

So you will await the outcome of someone's review - await it for what? So you will decide what to do with your shadow coins? What happens if he says shadowsend is almost as good as ducknote, will you dump shadow and buy ducknote?

Quote from: dewdeded on February 15, 2015, 10:32:11 AM

Who is Zeuner?

By all accounts Isidor Zeuner is a gifted cryptographer who's reputation precedes him. He has worked with BTC COre Devs and he is above reproach.

He is writing a peer review for ShadowSend v2 and will additionally contrast it to other anon architectures in this space (including DRK). This is not a code review but rather a review of cryptographic architectures.

I will be fascinated to learn how he compares DRK's two-tier MN architecture with Shadows bleeding-edge Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge Proofs implementation.

Ultimately the Shadow community has done a favor to the entire altcoin community by commissioning this review and it is quite possible Isidor will come out in your favor (bear in mind tho that SDC Team specifically asked for a compare/comtrast)

Gavin Andresen spoke about NIZKPs in DEV Core 2015
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3INbCnEfZq4

With Respect illodin
Even if Isidor finds an issue with Shadow I have complete confidence that rynomaster and technovert will fix it as the consummate professionals they are.

p.s. Mixing 7000BTC of DRK might take a while.
p.p.s May the best tech win.
http://shadow.cash/downloads/shadowcash-anon.pdf

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

Quote from: fuzzyduck on February 15, 2015, 04:10:17 PM

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 04:05:07 PM

Quote from: fuzzyduck on February 15, 2015, 03:57:14 PM

I was scared shitless 10min ago. I wanted to skim some drk from my MN to another address finding my masternode empty. 0 drk.
Looks like when you transfer drk the remaining drk automaticly gets another address?

Is it some safety feature so it always get mixed a bit? Huh

Maybe thats needs to be an option, not manditory. It freaked me out for sure. Thought i did something wrong.

Anyway. Im re-pushing it to the node and restart my PI 2 when its there.

Use the coin control to lock the 1000 DRK unspent input so it will remain in the same address. Otherwise the wallet might choose to send the 1 DRK or whatever you're sending from the 1000 DRK input and you'll end up with 999 DRK change in a new address.

Of couse its me doing it wrong i guess, since im not doing this stuff often and leave it as is. I do think the GUI could be more intuitive, but ofcourse that is not a priority atm. Waiting for my 1000drk to come trough. Still sitting at 0 confirmed for 30 min now. (non IX)

wait for at least 15 confirmations before restarting darkcoind
if you have activated coin control (settings - options - wallet) you can go to tab Send - Inputs - List mode and from there either put a lock on the 1000 input amount
or make sure not to select that specific input amount ever.. in an outgoing transaction. I normally just select other input amounts than that 1000 and sent it out.

pille

sr. member

Activity: 436

Merit: 250

Quote from: BrainShutdown on February 15, 2015, 03:48:23 PM

Booom

I cant read charts, can you explain please? I interpret it like "north is the direction again"? Tongue

G2M

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Activity: 616

Is it safe to say

"More decentralized than bitcoin"

is a legitimate advertising point?

https://blockchain.info/connected-nodes

vs.

https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

seems to indicate that there are 241 more masternodes available on the darkcoin network than the entire bitcoin network.

fuzzyduck

member

Activity: 78

Merit: 10

Quote from: illodin on February 15, 2015, 04:05:07 PM

Quote from: fuzzyduck on February 15, 2015, 03:57:14 PM

I was scared shitless 10min ago. I wanted to skim some drk from my MN to another address finding my masternode empty. 0 drk.
Looks like when you transfer drk the remaining drk automaticly gets another address?

Is it some safety feature so it always get mixed a bit? Huh

Maybe thats needs to be an option, not manditory. It freaked me out for sure. Thought i did something wrong.

Anyway. Im re-pushing it to the node and restart my PI 2 when its there.

Use the coin control to lock the 1000 DRK unspent input so it will remain in the same address. Otherwise the wallet might choose to send the 1 DRK or whatever you're sending from the 1000 DRK input and you'll end up with 999 DRK change in a new address.

Of couse its me doing it wrong i guess, since im not doing this stuff often and leave it as is. I do think the GUI could be more intuitive, but ofcourse that is not a priority atm. Waiting for my 1000drk to come trough. Still sitting at 0 confirmed for 30 min now. (non IX)

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: fuzzyduck on February 15, 2015, 03:57:14 PM

I was scared shitless 10min ago. I wanted to skim some drk from my MN to another address finding my masternode empty. 0 drk.
Looks like when you transfer drk the remaining drk automaticly gets another address?

Is it some safety feature so it always get mixed a bit? Huh

Maybe thats needs to be an option, not manditory. It freaked me out for sure. Thought i did something wrong.

Anyway. Im re-pushing it to the node and restart my PI 2 when its there.

Use the coin control to lock the 1000 DRK unspent input so it will remain in the same address. Otherwise the wallet might choose to send the 1 DRK or whatever you're sending from the 1000 DRK input and you'll end up with 999 DRK change in a new address.

jiggytom

legendary

Activity: 1068

Merit: 1020

Quote from: fuzzyduck on February 15, 2015, 03:57:14 PM

I was scared shitless 10min ago. I wanted to skim some drk from my MN to another address finding my masternode empty. 0 drk.
Looks like when you transfer drk the remaining drk automaticly gets another address?

Is it some safety feature so it always get mixed a bit? Huh

Maybe thats needs to be an option, not manditory. It freaked me out for sure. Thought i did something wrong.

Anyway. Im re-pushing it to the node and restart my PI 2 when its there.

I think there's an option to not use change addresses... Which is exactly what you encountered... A change address.

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2966. (Read 9724017 times)