This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet.
If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet.
If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet.
TY again!
Byt shouldn't funds go to each wallet instead just first one?
I didn't make this conf because too afraid to be hacked and then loose not 1000 drk but all.
Well they go to same wallet but all to first address
I use start-many and all my MN addresses get paid separately.
There is a conf that payment arrive to one addresse I hear it at the begining of the implementation.
I think you make it with import privkey of an already existing MN local.
But if you create them from a new wallet with more than one 1K vin, this is happening, (or something like that, well I remember hearing this case because someone detected an address that was receiveing more than other and was explaination of Evan I think or Flare.... )..
Edit UdjinM6... HElpppp this is possible right??
start-many - start many MNs by configuring masternode.conf and using start-many command family, no matter how you fund you MNs while you send exactly 1K to MNs addresses
send-to-many - fund all your MNs by 1 (one) transaction with many 1K recipients (outputs), for example, send 10k in one transaction to 10 different addresses by 1K each to fund 10 MNs at once. First address in this transaction will receive payments for every another one.
However the address you mentioned do not use this feature. It got its payments when coinmine.pl hit a bug we already fixed now. That bug caused pool to pay exact same random lucky MN first few blocks on every restart. However I'd like to thank coinmine.pl for following our updates very quickly and completely complying network rules (while I can't say the same about one another large pool that was already mentioned here...)
EDIT: and every other pool who updated too of course, thank you guys!
