Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3438. (Read 9723768 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction


Damn multipools

People need to find a p2pool node with the lowest latency to them and point their miners there:

http://p2pools.org/drk

My two p2pools that run and I have in first and as a backup:

http://drkp2pool-dallas.com:7903/static/
http://drkp2pool-socal.com:7903/static/

I've just grabbed an additional 1 Gh/s and pointed it at SuchPool for the next couple of days, BetaRigs doesn't want to play with DarkcoinTalk Pool at the minute.

If the situation gets dire I can grab another 3 Gh/s or so on Saturday...

Stonehedge, shall we dance?  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Hello, could someone please tell me if is it normal to have my Zemana Antilogger showing a message telling that darkcoin-qt.exe is trying to take captures from clipboard? thanks
legendary
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction


Damn multipools

People need to find a p2pool node with the lowest latency to them and point their miners there:

http://p2pools.org/drk

My two p2pools that run and I have in first and as a backup:

http://drkp2pool-dallas.com:7903/static/
http://drkp2pool-socal.com:7903/static/
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction
I'm not a miner, what does this mean? Not good that they are mining almost 50% of the coins?
legendary
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
Do you guys think that the difficulty went down because less people are mining because of the masternode payment increase (and thus miner decrease)?
legendary
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help  Smiley

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby

Not having the greatest tour so far  Cry

Meh they'll win that one. Well they better I have a princely 1 drk riding on it.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help  Smiley

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby

Not having the greatest tour so far  Cry
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help  Smiley

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 102
Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.
I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.

From memory, some of the SGMiner versions needed to be set-up quite differently depending on what drivers you were running.  I remember one set of drivers hating dual threads but you could push it quite hard as a single thread, and visa versa for other versions of ATI Catalyst.
Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.
I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.

From memory, some of the SGMiner versions needed to be set-up quite differently depending on what drivers you were running.  I remember one set of drivers hating dual threads but you could push it quite hard as a single thread, and visa versa for other versions of ATI Catalyst.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
hero member
Activity: 528
Merit: 500
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 102
Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.
I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.
Jump to: