Here's an analogy: if Bob has ten separate outlook email accounts, and receives email at all the accounts, instead of individually logging into each account to check his mail, he just makes an inbox with all account inboxes together.
The only thing this does it make it easier to check his mail but he still has the ten separate email accounts. No more or less email is being checked compared to logging into each account individually. Same amount of email for the accounts, only easier to check.
Except nobody loves Bob and nobody ever sends him any emails no matter how many email accounts he has.
"Sutton is known, albeit apocryphally, for the urban legend that he said that he robbed banks 'because that's where the money is.'" - Wikipedia
Why are we making it easier for big wallets to run MNs? Because, duh, they already have the DRKs to do it, so, uh, do it. That's where the money is. Fix the problem that is keeping them out... No need to force more buys when the coin is already sitting there...
This move really puts a damper on the people who said it was just a pump attempt to strangle supply. I was concerned about it looking that way myself, and possibly choking off supply to the point that it would drown the coin for good in an already heavily attenuated market. Like it or not, cryptotards decide if this project lives or dies. Your future, in the hands of the lowest, dumbest trash that has ever lived...