Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3910. (Read 9723748 times)

The MN payments can't be bypassed that way as the p2pool node makes them, not the individual miner (or farm.)

But keep the MNs behind the planned IP obfuscation? Would need to be it's own protocol/fabric.

You kept all that anger inside you for the last weeks? LOL



Looks like you already have quite a many new ones. LOL



First troll that I made quit by busting his sock puppet trolling. Didn't know you took it so hard. LOL


That's three LOL's for you.

And one for the road, go choke on it and die, loser: LOL

CrunchPool just moved to a new server in Canada, with low latency to US and Europe, you can still mine DRK, BTC and more coins with us!
http://p2pool.crunchpool.com:7903

Can I make an ordinary pool and then forward my hashrate to p2pool masquarading as an individual? If yes, it can be bypassed.

Enforce p2pool. With Masternodes as p2pool nodes. No more bad pools, no more 51% attack, guaranteed decentralisation.

Aw yeah, blowjay is back! Pump incoming... lols.

I r watching you from the moon. It's a giant titty-shaped moon. Y U NO HERE?

His writing style is similar to the guy who provoked an attack against Monero.

Might not be him, but clearly there have been some issues with a few cryptonote fans of various flavors causing CN wars.

Like I've always said, he is crypto cancer.

I just sent a mail to his lawyer in Russia
http://www.kucherena.ru/contacts/

Yeah, lets feature add and mull the MN count thoughts as that happens. It's good to think ahead and always be asking "So, what awesomeness will I do next?" But not at the expense of the immediate tasks...

This list is perfect.

There needs to be more thinking out loud about the MN count augmentation interest. These other things are already "Hell yeah! Git sum1!!"

My 2 duffs for development priorities:

1. Leave the MN payment formula as it is right now. No need for tampering it...

2. Provide strong IP obfuscation - or TOR-merging, so that DRK is usable for "fund Snowden" type of stuff. If DRK doesn't do it, clones will. "We have DarkSend plus IP obf".

3. Find a way (or outsource) a solution to get back to MN payments at a protocol level, without workarounds and without forking.

4. Wallet stuff / visual improvements.

5. Instant TXs

(some could be worked in parallel)

LoL !! You've excelled yourself there.

You've got your troll hat on today I see - must've dumped and hoping to hell it doesn't recover before your target.

I see your point, but I'm not sure it's valid. If we don't care about sybil now because it's a crazy longshot, why do we care about sybil later when it is exactly the same longshot?

If it's raining and you're inside the house and not worried about getting wet today, why would you suddenly be worried about getting wet tomorrow under the same conditions? I think viable sybil conditions are being overstated.

I'm also not suggesting that the MN cost be cut by an order of magnitude. That's way too much. The lower price will make them more viable for operators, and avoid share scheme consolidation, or "centralized coinjoin servers" as the douche trolls like to FUD it up. While you theoretically "increase" sybil concerns in a way that is still of no actual real-world concern, you drastically decrease these other things... If you cut the MN PoService retention cost to 700 instead of 1000, it'll probably double the qty of MNs due to accessibility.

I'm only saying it would be better to try that way instead of experiment with reward/tax rate because we already know how sensitive that is in valuation, confidence, and trolling... Not saying it should be ruled out, just that I don't think it's a good first option... The end goal being more MNs, we can try something a little less heavy handed before going to this option... I guess I'm saying that it's like the nuclear option. It's on the table, but we should try a few other things first. Kitty stuck in a tree? DROP THE BOMB seems like an over-reaction... All we're trying to do is get more MNs, right? If you wanted 3000 MNs at the current coin supply, holy crap, 3/4 of the market cap would be tied up. Price would skyrocket... If people didn't see that as the obvious manipulation that it would look like to me... Is it really practical to think that you can tie up 70% of the coin supply in a service network? Exactly what service is being provided to the tiny amount of coins, and users, that remain? See how this looks?

I'm sure a variable MN reward system is a cool idea, and it mimics how miners are paid with difficulty. But miners and MNs are apples and oranges. While it's "cool" to implement a familiar dynamic metric handler, it doesn't necessarily apply to the matter... I think guns are cool, but they aren't always the appropriate answer to a given situation... It may be really cool, but I don't think it's the right tool for the job.

No one wants to see $550/DRK more than I do. I just don't think it'd be a healthy way to get it. If people even bought into it with those slants...

Can we keep it evenly divisible into 1000, so that people like myself don't lose a percentage because they can't divide their coin into those masternodes evenly, thus lose a proportion of their income? 

Not likely.  He probably dumped a majority of his instamine when the price peaked.  The current sellers are bagholders finally jumping off this sinking ship.



That's because now it can be forked and launched with a fair distribution instead of the instamine scam that drk is.  Other reasons include coins with superior anonymity, a disgust by the altcoin community in general towards darkcoin and all the brainwashed cheerleaders.  darkcoin is a pathetic cult based off of a scam.  Even now there are idiots talking "more cheap drk" even while they dump what they hold.

Anyone looking for an anonymous cryptocurrency would be better off choosing any of the other options available.  Any cryptonote release has better anonymity than darkcoin without the need for darkcoins CENTRALIZED masternode network.

Then there are projects like SuperNet that will combine all the features of many coins into one location and make these features available to everyone even if you don't hold the coin that is offering the feature.

You also have that mentally deficient sissy called camoshit acting like a complete moron and attacking people with his ignorant rants.  Did that drk bagholder ever get his Tesla?  If not, his misfortune pleases me.  And what about that fool saying he wouldn't sell until drk reached $300?  He'll be waiting forever.  And how is that Professional Investor that studied altcoins and came to drk because he knows how to make money?  Finally, did that other fool actually sell his BMW and property to invest in drk?  If he did then he made a terrible investment in this instamined scam.  

Bottom line:

Darkcoin is a dead coin.  It's time has passed.  Nobody believes the bullshit anymore except the braindead darkcoin cult members.

I warned people but they didn't listen.  So while myself and many others made massive profits dumping drk and trading other coins, many bought into the darkcoin hype and watched their holding lose value when they could have been making significant gains.  But hey, they can always brag about being a member of the darkcoin bagholders club.

I'm done here and will retire this screen name.  That doesn't mean that I'm done with altcoins.  It just means that I'm done with this scam called darkcoin.

You can either sell darkcoin now for what you can get or watch what you have  continue to lose value.  Your choice.  

Darkcoin, the Instamine Scam that is going nowhere.

P.S.

I forgot to point out the fact that there have been enhanced private miners as proven by wolf.  So this scam runs even deeper than most people ever thought.  

1. Instamine
2. Private enhanced miners
3. Centralization


That's three strikes against this coin.  

No need to respond to my post.  Please continue posting your pathetic meme's, talking about the moon, and just basically continuing your little circle jerk of hardcore darkcoin bagholders.  I'm just a troll and a fudster anyway right?  I'll take those labels over bagholder any day.  Time for me to make some more money while the darkcoin bagholders complain about the price and act butthurt over the fact that people are bailing on instamined scamcoin in droves.

This is my last post.  shojayxt will self destruct in 30 seconds.

Dos Svidanya

  




  

Yah, but you said it would increase the traffic and cause excessive lag??  No?

This is the consensus we are seeming to reach on DCT...

NO!  He is just saying that it would be better for the coin if the developers would release a well functioning miner from the get go so that everyone has the best available, so that people like himself wouldn't have an advantage.  Of course, he needs the money, he made a better miner, so he keeps it to himself.

I think he is sort of correct, it would be nice to have the most efficient miner available to everyone, and Evan has said he would like to devote some time in optimizing the miner, but he's been too busy.

But in the end, there will never be fair distribution for mining.  People who can code, can optimize for themselves and their hardware, people with money can buy the best equipment, etc... etc...  It's called competition and as long as the rewards are worth it, things will get more efficient and productive for those with the ability to make it so.  There is no reason why they shouldn't benefit from their work and abilities either, IMO. 

So actually, I disagree with Wolf0, I don't think the developer would ever get a coin off the ground by being so meticulous as to bring the miner up to the best it could possibly be.  That amount of time required of him is not worth it.  He was smart to spend his time on getting the coin to work.  As long as the distribution of mining power was relatively balanced, that was all we needed.  Even so, it swung over 50% a few times.  Now the network is larger and doesn't swing so badly anymore, and DRK has matured a lot.

So no, I don't believe in everything being fair.  I think, for people on the ball, they'll get their fair share of life eventually.  If they miss out once, they'll be on it next time.  For others like myself, without the talent, I am glad to have stumbled upon this coin early and learned as fast as I could how to mine.  I wish I knew I could rent an instance to mine back then!  Oh, I could have been rich!  LOL.  But I was so green, I had no clue.

Anyway, that's life.  Gotta grab it by the balls, or work 9-5 till you're 70 years old.  And just cause you can't grab as many balls as the next guy because you don't have the talent or money, doesn't mean you can't scramble up a nice chunk of 'em for yourself in accordance to your talent

The Masternode network can be thought of as the Darkcoin amount it takes to subvert the network. Decreasing the amount of coins required for a Masternode to operate does increase the number of Masternodes, but it also maintains the same level of security. For example, if you change the rule to 100DRK per Masternode, we'll end up with 5x-10x more masternodes but the cost of a sybil attack will actually remain the same or even decrease.

BabyGiraffe has a great post about this here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/development-update-oct-1-2014.2561/page-4#post-23297
 

Easy answer: 400DRK for a MN instead of 1000DRK.

People don't have to play with share systems to reach it. Stays distributed. Get more MNs.

Because of greater accessibility, half the price will get you more than double the MN count. No coin supply/reward/tax tampering needed.