Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5124. (Read 9723733 times)

You said you have the superior coin, when it used TRUSTED transactions. I don't need to make any other argument, you just made a fool of yourself.

All this superiority talk I hear from day one.

Dan makes a centralized mixer "wowwwwwwwwww we did more than DRK did in months"... just for making a centralized mixer, lol.

Then he makes the "decentralized" trusted mixers that lost coins and you are like "WOOOOWWWWW FIRST WORKING ANON", lol.

Now you are telling me, ok I'm not really superior, but one day I will be.

It's june 20th 2014. I've heard about the NSA-proof Rev 2.0 for over a month when it was supposed to be delivered in 2-3 weeks.

=> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6932856

...and we haven't even solved the issue of trusted transactions.

So, instead of being here and being happy for the problems of others, go back and solve your own problems. It's more productive.

i did, whats the problem? only thing i didnt do is accept the download popup because i dont actually want to download it

There you go
Eltito to the rescue,
as always

tx man

How is it affecting you? Darkcoin isn't working for you? No one should be worried unless they are wanting masternode payments right away

Hey, guys, lurker here. I've been reading a lot and looked at a couple of other coins and I know that people are feeling frustrated that this hard fork for the second time didn't go as planned. Although I'm quite new to the bitcoin scene, from what I can tell this is just a small hiccup to development. It seems the developers ARE doing things right (the issues this time were less serious than last time and were able to self-correct); it's just taking them a while. I think we need to remember the DarkSend IS WORKING (although there's are a few limitations to it which will probably be able to be fixed fairly soon after MN payments come out).

Although there are some problems with masternode payments right now, it seems clear to me that improvements are being made (while slowly) and that DRK is the clear leader as it is currently the only coin that actually has the ability to sent coins anonymously RIGHT NOW (although with limitations). Just my personal opinion though.

I have joined the dev team, and we are working on solutions dont worry, there is always light at the end of the tunnel :-)

Chill out dude.  Just trying to lighten the mood with some movie quotes.

First one was from The Matrix

The last one was from the Game of Thrones.

Why so serious!

(ps - this last one was from The Dark Knight)

thats why everybody gets stuck on there
that is NOT .02 !
that is 9.10.0

my eyes are wide open !

Thanks for the enlightenment, Mr. Big Mouth.

tungfa, the Mac wallet is not maintained by the core dev team.  It is done by a community member on his own time.  As soon as it's ready, it will be posted on the page you linked.

Problem is this happens all the time now.  Every fork.  Tired of this BS.  Time to move on to something new.  This old lady has sung her last song.

LOL this thread is turning into a crypto sales convention, yeah xyz coin has this and that and is so much superior.. 

Just curious has XC figured out how to handle people that reprogram their wallet to steal the coins ?



And just a quick reminder:

lmfao
Try clicking it.

You know nothing, Jon Snow

VRC already has working anon and will be releasing a ring based decentralized and trustless anon in the upcoming version.  All without the block chain bloat that affects the cryptonote based coins.

http://www.darkcoin.io/getstarted.html

its right there... open your eyes? click the download link where it says "mac"

@cryptozoidberg is legit. Don't sit here and talk shit you armchair developer.

Name a coin that isn't getting farmed by a massive GPU/CPU cluster - there will always be people with big money willing to make big money.

Hmm. So taking a 1-3% mining fee is ok for pools but not the people actually working on furthering the development lifecycle of the coin? Never really understood this argument. Pool owners take the coins dump them on the market then turn around and add support for other coins ultimately ending up becoming a multi-pool - which contributes nothing to the development of the coin. Yet if a developer takes a 1% fee either from a pre-mine or mining fee to give for bounties which contribute to the progress of the actual coin then it's suckcoin?

So what you're saying is to make a good coin a developer needs to develop the coin, then hire rigs to mine the coin he developed. Then from the proceeds the developer earns from mining he is supposed to then turn around and give those away for bounties and promotions? After all of that the developer makes himself available 24/7 to ridiculed because a coding issue her might of missed while he was working for free.

Hmm I wish I could hire an employee that gives all his wages back to me, pays for all the businesses operating costs and lets me bitch him out when he made a mistake or the business isn't doing good. Meanwhile I'm making money trading shares of the business and not contributing anything to it. Sounds like a perfect world.

"MAC Wallet 9.10.2 its not out yet, its an independant dev that compiles for OSx "
in case anybody else wonder !

I'd personally like to thank AlexGR for keeping us up to date with dev convos in IRC test channel. I was in the main channel (#Darkcoin) but not in the test channel and I suck at IRC so I was relying on Alex for info. Thank you!

Yea , for some perspective DRK was .0165 just 2 days ago!   So, at .015 relatively still dead cat bounce area.