id rather see more posting from the dev and team about updates and ideas.
all this chatter and "mentioning of other coins" is not what miners/investors are coming here for.
this coin should be trading @ .04 today not .017
can we hear more from dev and team please.
thanks fellas!
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5424. (Read 9723776 times)
May 30, 2014, 11:46:53 AM
May 30, 2014, 11:44:12 AM
1) What happens if a terrorist or child porn freak sends funds through a master node?
What if one kills somebody with a knife? Forbidden knives??
May 30, 2014, 11:43:37 AM
From his history this guy is clearly an actual bitfinex customer, as opposed to a paid FUDder.
We need to be able to respond to this.
We need to be able to respond to this.
As a swap provider I will immidiately withdraw all of my funds from bitfinex in case of BFX adding darkcoin to their trading platform for mainly two reasons:
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
This guy is fairly ignorant and nothing can be done about those types. The legal implications are WAY overblown and nothing about DRK is shady. The guy is the typical BTC owner that hates all alts (judging by the LTC comment). I can't imagine the majority thinks like this or finex never would have been considering DRK.
Anyway around it -- getting into a flame war on these forums helps nothing. If we want to help the coin on the exchange the best way is to try and get Ape to negotiate (I remember him trying with regard to BTC-e).
Everything else aside, he does make a valid point about DRK's volatility -- in the past week we have seen DRK go 100% both ways.
May 30, 2014, 11:41:41 AM
1) What happens if a terrorist or child porn freak sends funds through a master node?
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
1) Already done 1Billion times with $
2) Did the 7 billions people on earth got interogated after each terrorist attack ?
3) Same as 1
4)Nice try.
You didn't even answer my questions. I don't know why you are so defensive. I have a family and a life that I don't want to see get torn down because of a stupid misunderstanding. Figures associated with Silk Road in the slightest were detained. Charlie Schrem claims to not know about illicit activity on his exchange. He still had to go through trouble because that's the way the FEDs are. They don't give a f*ck.
Just want to say that all currency and crypto-cu could be used for shitty things ... the advantage of DRK is the anon feature, they can found you, but can't found what you buy/sell/do.
May 30, 2014, 11:40:56 AM
You didn't even answer my questions. I don't know why you are so defensive. I have a family and a life that I don't want to see get torn down because of a stupid misunderstanding. Figures associated with Silk Road in the slightest were detained. Charlie Schrem claims to not know about illicit activity on his exchange. He still had to go through trouble because that's the way the FEDs are. They don't give a f*ck.
And you didn't read the other answers you just pick that one.
May 30, 2014, 11:40:40 AM
This is a serious question, and applies for both DRK and XC because I am legitimately concerned about this : if you are to host a master node (or xNode for XC), can you not be charged with money laundering (if convicted) if you are a resident of the USA? Or because the IRS classified crypto as property and not a currency, this is not the case? Does anyone know?
I do know that it doesn't matter if you know whether or not you know where the money is coming from or going (you cannot the play the "well I didn't know it was drug money card"), but because you are facilitating the process, you are liable. But this goes back to my property vs currency and what kind of rules apply here?
I do know that it doesn't matter if you know whether or not you know where the money is coming from or going (you cannot the play the "well I didn't know it was drug money card"), but because you are facilitating the process, you are liable. But this goes back to my property vs currency and what kind of rules apply here?
Sorry, but I lulzed at this. Has it really got so bad over there that someone can get arrested for doing something that the rest of the world does on a daily basis & takes for granted? That's a crazy paranoia-o-meter reading. IRS, CIA, NSA, DHS, FBI, etc, etc - the US is now at a level that the old E German Stasi could only dream of - what ever happened to "land of the free"?
May 30, 2014, 11:40:25 AM
1) What happens if a terrorist or child porn freak sends funds through a master node?
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
1) Already done 1Billion times with $
2) Did the 7 billions people on earth got interogated after each terrorist attack ?
3) Same as 1
4)Nice try.
You didn't even answer my questions. I don't know why you are so defensive. I have a family and a life that I don't want to see get torn down because of a stupid misunderstanding. Figures associated with Silk Road in the slightest were detained. Charlie Schrem claims to not know about illicit activity on his exchange. He still had to go through trouble because that's the way the FEDs are. They don't give a f*ck.
I answered:
The whole point of Darkcoin is that the coins become fungible. You can't link them to anything, so they become eCash. If you can't link the transaction to anything, you can't be accused of anything.
Besides, the SilkRoad bitcoins were recently sold by the US government.
its the actions of those involved, not the crypto.
May 30, 2014, 11:38:00 AM
1) What happens if a terrorist or child porn freak sends funds through a master node?
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
1) Already done 1Billion times with $
2) Did the 7 billions people on earth got interogated after each terrorist attack ?
3) Same as 1
4)Nice try.
You didn't even answer my questions. I don't know why you are so defensive. I have a family and a life that I don't want to see get torn down because of a stupid misunderstanding. Figures associated with Silk Road in the slightest were detained. Charlie Schrem claims to not know about illicit activity on his exchange. He still had to go through trouble because that's the way the FEDs are. They don't give a f*ck.
May 30, 2014, 11:37:14 AM
A person running a masternode cannot be charged for any bad activity done through DRK. Did you know sick freaks put childporn in Bitcoin's blockchain? As long as you don't view it, you cannot be charged. Same with running a masternode.
The whole point of Darkcoin is that the coins become fungible. You can't link them to anything, so they become eCash. If you can't link the transaction to anything, you can't be accused of anything.
Besides, the SilkRoad bitcoins were recently sold by the US government.
its the actions of those involved, not the crypto.
May 30, 2014, 11:35:49 AM
How was childporn inserted into BTC's blockchain?
I'm not sure how, but after a quick google, there are a ton of other things inserted in the blockchain too, such as viruses, pictures etc, There are some sick people in Bitcoin community doing those things my friend..
http://www.righto.com/2014/02/ascii-bernanke-wikileaks-photographs.html
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/25otbt/someone_put_a_virus_signature_in_the_bitcoin/
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/illegal-content-in-the-blockchain-11381
May 30, 2014, 11:34:44 AM
From his history this guy is clearly an actual bitfinex customer, as opposed to a paid FUDder.
We need to be able to respond to this.
He lost credibility upon mentioning AUR in his rant. But he's basically showing that there will be a risk premium associated with lending out BTC to buy DRK. And, while he may not have the stomach (or balls) to lend out, at a certain level of return there will be those who are willing to lend. Bitfinex isn't going head-on into this without thoroughly doing their due diligence. We need to be able to respond to this.
As a swap provider I will immidiately withdraw all of my funds from bitfinex in case of BFX adding darkcoin to their trading platform for mainly two reasons:
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
May 30, 2014, 11:34:12 AM
From his history this guy is clearly an actual bitfinex customer, as opposed to a paid FUDder.
We need to be able to respond to this.
Let him "immidiately withdraw". Bitfinex would not give a toss. We need to be able to respond to this.
As a swap provider I will immidiately withdraw all of my funds from bitfinex in case of BFX adding darkcoin to their trading platform for mainly two reasons:
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
1. possible legal implications already mentioned in this thread.
2. As a swap provider I cannont decide on whom I'm lending funds and what for. While I feel pretty comfortable lending out money for btc trading and grudgingly accept ltc trading I will not lend out money to people trading a 4 months old shady coin which could go down to a cent any second (auroracoin for example which has lost over 99.5 % of it's peak value). As I can not decide to whom my funds go and feel that BFX is already operating on thin ice with its theoretical swap fund insurance I have no other choice than pulling out in case of a darkcoin adding.
May 30, 2014, 11:33:45 AM
PROBLEM SOLVED thanks to IRC.
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
Pls no dump
Oh wow, apologies are in order and congrats
May 30, 2014, 11:33:23 AM
How was childporn inserted into BTC's blockchain?
May 30, 2014, 11:31:59 AM
A person running a masternode cannot be charged for any bad activity done through DRK. Did you know sick freaks put childporn in Bitcoin's blockchain? As long as you don't view it, you cannot be charged. Same with running a masternode.
May 30, 2014, 11:31:40 AM
PROBLEM SOLVED thanks to IRC.
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
Pls no dump
May 30, 2014, 11:31:37 AM
Didn't realize that they had a chart showing how much trade Mintpal has been doing on DRK.
http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/markets/graphicalComparison
Didn't even know Mintpal offered USD to BTC..hmm
These are all the exchanges around the world and their main trading pairs.
May 30, 2014, 11:30:59 AM
PROBLEM SOLVED thanks to IRC.
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
Glad you managed to get your problem sorted.
Ian
May 30, 2014, 11:30:42 AM
1) What happens if a terrorist or child porn freak sends funds through a master node?
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
2) Won't the FEDs be ripping apart your home and interrogating you (for running the master node)?
3) Will any large-scale businesses want to share the same payment network that could be used against them?
(ex: competitor starts defacement campaign because of their support for DRK, calls them child predator, terrorist etc)
1) Already done 1Billion times with $
2) Did the 7 billions people on earth got interogated after each terrorist attack ?
3) Same as 1
4)Nice try.
May 30, 2014, 11:30:29 AM
PROBLEM SOLVED thanks to IRC.
26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
build some masternodes. 50% ROI at current MN count. 26000 Darkcoins... Yeah baby
Jump to: