Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5474. (Read 9723733 times)

Please tell me how are you gonna tell how many bitcoins someone owns if he uses a different address for each customer/transaction and doesn't move them to a concentrating address.

You talk about turnover, I talk about account details, transactions in real time, how the money is used, how much did they pay a supplier etc. sensitive informations. You are either dumb or naive.

If people don't believe the Masternode issue can be fixed, then they SHOULD sell the coin.  If people believe it CAN be fixed, they should buy the coin because it will eventually overtake litecoin.  Simple as that.

I just want to give my opinion as someone who holds alot of XC and some DRK; It's not about thin skinned or thick skinned, it's people forgetting why XC even rose in the first place, the utter greed of the Dark cartel. Yes, saying I'm sorry for the instamine can be a valid defense, but it wasn't exactly rectified when these 2 million coins mined for mere pennies were sold on the exchanges for as high as a dollar for months even before basic Darksend was ever implemented. At least XC started off cheap, you could have picked up as much as 50k of them for less than a Bitcoin in its opening days on the exchanges.

Now that XC started rising and the Dark cartel sees its profits slipping, this fud gets spread on twitter that ends up costing alot of people their money panic selling. I wouldn't be shocked if the same whales who exploited this are the same people who own all the Dark too.

It's this high barrier of entry into Dark and the fact the Masternode system seems setup to further enrich all those big early Dark holders that has turned so many people off.

Now I'm not going to say Evan is responsible for the instamine or that he intended for an elite few to take hold of most of the coins, I don't know what is in his heart or mind, but I'm just saying this is all the PERCEPTION that many people have of Dark, and little has been done to fix that image. At the end of the day you can have the best product on the block but if you price yourself out of the market, you lose out, a good example is Apple v.s Microsoft in the 80s. This twitter drama only further enforces the view that Dark has an ivory tower mentality.

Anyway I want to say I am not an enemy of the Dark community, I actually want both coins to succeed because I think competition is healthy and benefits all, but I just think you need to see how the other camp thinks if you want Dark to succeed and win in the end.

are you retarded? arguing about something stupid like this???

COCAIN LORDS and HITMANS will use DARKCOIN... they will raise this coin to the roof because when they figure it out they will buy all they can belive me

that said... HODL is our chance

All this companies are public (by law this information need to be public). Try to find how much sell or have a private company (not listed on any exchange). You will need to check the Taxes, or have a friend inside a bank.

If I come out here and say "Hi, my name is Jeremy Marel" and then turn around and right beside that say "Hi, my name is **** ****," how does that help with anything? The information is already out there. You anonymizing data that's already been shared is ridiculous; everyone already knows what the anonymized data IS.

If someone upsets you, please use IGNORE button everyone.  

It has nothing to do with companies and everything to do with personal freedom and privacy.

No room for talking sense here, only pumpers are allowed in this thread.

Such clean threads with the above three people on ignore.

EXACTLY!

Wow... You spelled it all out and you still don't understand?

No, no, fuck this. I've got work to do...

You're going to have to spell this out to me. We know how much Microsoft earns. We know how much they spend. We know where they source things from. Same with Apple. Same with Blizzard. Same with Exxon. How is ANY of this going to matter? And if it's so important, why is it all public information anyways? Basically you want to anonymize data that is already publicly displayed. That's asinine.

nope but i am still dumping it tough get you buy orders up

Cuz cash... Printed by... Oh, I just can't do it today...

You can't be serious, it's a joke right ? You don't see the issue for a company to let its competitors see its income, when it sells the most/the less, how much it receives per transaction in average etc.

SHAME!

Bump. I've reached out to the devs.

lmao

This thread is comedy gold tonight. Congrats all, you are accidentally the funniest people alive.