Last night on irc:
[04:49]
aaxx1503, masternodes w/ multiple ticket entries
...
[04:50] aaxx1503, send 3k drk to a masternode and it'll get elected 3x as often
...
[04:50] RC3
...
[04:51] evan82, ah ok! Sounds great, what about the anoninimity upgrade? Denominated change and something else secret ?
...
[04:51] evan82, you said it would rival ring signatures, that's why I'M asking
...
[04:51] aaxx1503, a very huge anon upgrade. very secret
Multi-entry MNs will be nice. Long mentioned. Not a surprise. Such noobs calling it an announcement...
Very huge anon upgrade... The like-ringsigs option or the I2P option? Or both at the same time?
I'm interested in knowing if multi-entry MNs will be automatically re-ticketed based on the DRK qty alone, and if DRK can be added/removed and the tickets shift with that? A great way to drop the node count while still maintaining the income utility for the node operators and the more DRK in the node, the more interested in securing the node the operator must be. Holy run-on sentences, batman! Maintaining one machine and one daemon and one .conf is mo betta than 28...
MNs are not the new mining. People with that expectation have defective expectation and need to read more before whining about their limp money hose. Go ahead and make an emotional decision to sell your DRK, I'll buy it. Qty of MNs will affect piece of pie. Get over "making the prediction come true." You don't get guarantees in mining, either, and this is even less than mining. Hell it's 10% of what the miners get, if you even get it... It's a fee for providing the service of supporting the network. Should the Janitor get paid more than the CEO? Whatever...