Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6248. (Read 9724097 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
i seriously believe within a few years with talent of the dev we could be in the hundreds maybe evan more.

I see what your typo did there...

I don't mean to be a fanboy, it's just that Evan knows how this is meant to be done. In a sea of ShitCoins, this is really the only one that makes sense. I put my money on the hopes that eventually that clue trickles up...

Betting on sound logic is not necessarily a sound investment when 99.9999999% of the human race is so damn stupid...
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/


That article tells me that the author, Branson, Gates, and the other guy mentioned don't have a clue. Seriously, you have to be plain stupid to want MORE monitoring of your personal business by any self-proclaimed authority.



No, monitoring of us.....not them

Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing with me? Because I must caution you that one of those options is incorrect!

opt-in, means not mandatory.

I would look at it like exchanges. If you want to get fiat in or out, you have to tell them who you are. With Darksend, none of the personal information is gathered or linked to the blockchain.

Basic math tells me that fiat isn't worth what it's printed on. The whole shambles is overdue for complete collapse.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/


That article tells me that the author, Branson, Gates, and the other guy mentioned don't have a clue. Seriously, you have to be plain stupid to want MORE monitoring of your personal business by any self-proclaimed authority.



No, monitoring of us.....not them

Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing with me? Because I must caution you that one of those options is incorrect!

opt-in, means not mandatory.

I would look at it like exchanges. If you want to get fiat in or out, you have to tell them who you are. With Darksend, none of the personal information is gathered or linked to the blockchain.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/


That article tells me that the author, Branson, Gates, and the other guy mentioned don't have a clue. Seriously, you have to be plain stupid to want MORE monitoring of your personal business by any self-proclaimed authority.



No, monitoring of us.....not them

Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing with me? Because I must caution you that one of those options is unwise!

edit: yikes, nethash >20GH and diff 1.12k.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000

I am getting ready to smoke a bowl and buy some more DRK!  Grin

Please go back to the "don't bring a sword to a gun fight" picture that was posted a few pages back and give us your newly found unique perspective on it please.
lol, this is quite a elevated post

I am as high as the price will be next year.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000

I am getting ready to smoke a bowl and buy some more DRK!  Grin

Please go back to the "don't bring a sword to a gun fight" picture that was posted a few pages back and give us your newly found unique perspective on it please.
lol, this is quite a elevated post
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/


That article tells me that the author, Branson, Gates, and the other guy mentioned don't have a clue. Seriously, you have to be plain stupid to want MORE monitoring of your personal business by any self-proclaimed authority.



No, monitoring of us.....not them
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/


That article tells me that the author, Branson, Gates, and the other guy mentioned don't have a clue. Seriously, you have to be plain stupid to want MORE monitoring of your personal business by any self-proclaimed authority.

hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000

I am getting ready to smoke a bowl and buy some more DRK!  Grin

Please go back to the "don't bring a sword to a gun fight" picture that was posted a few pages back and give us your newly found unique perspective on it please.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000

I am getting ready to smoke a bowl and buy some more DRK!  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
It may not have gone down very well, but building in an opt-in third party ID verification system into mobile darkcoin wallets could give it the edge in the future for mainstream adoption, even while using DarkSend....here is why:

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/12510/sir-richard-branson-wants-a-transparent-cryptocurrency-but-will-customers/
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
something is brewing fellas!
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
same problem for me it says syncing but it stays unsynced...
it is synced up to 57146 block

Anyone that is stuck syncing on windows, can you email the debug log to [email protected]?

linux qt wallet v0.10.3.4-38-gd79df3d-beta still spending well over half its time syncing. Doesn't seem to be a showstopper, just a bit annoying.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
Is that 70btc buy wall at mintpal normal?

edit: now only 47btc left.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
same problem for me it says syncing but it stays unsynced...
it is synced up to 57146 block

Anyone that is stuck syncing on windows, can you email the debug log to [email protected]?
hero member
Activity: 965
Merit: 515
Could anyone help me?

My wallet shows that it is currently synchronizing with the network -- however, It states that it is " 0 hours behind "

As far as i can tell, all my transactions are always up to date, and i instantly receive most payments.

My first steps to diagnose the problem were too delete peers.dat , blocks folder, and chainstate folder.

After a cold re-sync, The wallet is up to date for a few minutes before it resorts back to synchrnozing with the network with a status of " 0 hours behind " ...


When hovering over the progress bar it shows - 56,920 blocks out of 470,000 have been proccessed.

Can anyone explain this issue to me ?


Mine behaves exactly the same. Version v0.10.3.4-38-gd79df3d-beta.

Grab RC1, the version is v0.10.4.0. There was a bug with downloading blocks in the previous beta

Ok thanks for the prompt response! I was under impression that RC1 was optional.

Edit: Can confirm - RC1 has resolved the issue.

Wait some longer.
I have the RC1 running since it was available. The issue did not dissapear.



Agreed, The issue is reoccuring for me. Chaeplin's instructions were a little confusing for me to follow - did it solve the issue?

Could DEV please comment on the severity of this issue? Is it simply not an issue? Not sure =/


It is something that has to be corrected in the coin itself. Amuseing to me LimeCoin dev's understood it. They decided not to do it since it requires a hard fork. I recomment the dev to read it up on the link I posted. It links over to that Limecoin.

I didn't mine LimeCoins because that issue and I don't see any future in that coin anyway (byway there a 2 different LimeCoins now so they kill themself)

DarkCoin is a bit a different story. I am not really happy with DarkCoin for a number of reasons but I know that it is a major player and gains values and so I go along with it.

Chaeplin's instruction is a workaround.

He listed all the foreign IP's coming from LiteCoin and WorldCoin that connect to DarkCoin and tells you to set your routing on your system to route those IP's into nirvana so the client doesn't sees them.

I haven't tested it yet. Busy with others. But I am confident it will work.

However in looking into the future I more liked the dev would take it serious and fix it by the next occasion.
A serious coin with such a flaw is a bit of a joke.


Worshiping a scam coin with a dev that makes death threats, can't spell and writes penis in the introduction to his coin, gives you a lot of cred Smiley

Please put away your drugs.

Read and if you don't understand don't post. It wasn't meant for you.

Sometimes I really have to wonder about the ppl posting.

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Admin of CoinMiners Pools
New DarkCoin P2pool

http://international.servehttp.com:7903/static/


./sgminer -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://international.servehttp.com:7903 -u WALLET -p x
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
My wallet quit syncing. I tried adding a .conf with addnode's but nah-dah.
What is the fix?
I even tried connection to tor.
literally the timer is going backwards. It says syncing but it's not.
That coin has been unconfirmed for 16 hrs.
 Huh

https://i.imgur.com/cLO5CDe.png

https://i.imgur.com/gNizbIj.png

Nuking it worked!

Thank you!

I spoke too soon.
It syncs up to two weeks, and then hangs.

 Huh  Huh

same problem for me it says syncing but it stays unsynced...
it is synced up to 57146 block
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
emailed http://www.altaccept.com/ earlier and they accepted us to there site, it's like coinpayments and looks good, so can add that to list of services
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
derp
My wallet quit syncing. I tried adding a .conf with addnode's but nah-dah.
What is the fix?
I even tried connection to tor.
literally the timer is going backwards. It says syncing but it's not.
That coin has been unconfirmed for 16 hrs.
 Huh





Nuking it worked!

Thank you!

I spoke too soon.
It syncs up to two weeks, and then hangs.

 Huh  Huh
Jump to: