Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6802. (Read 9723517 times)

legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
I heard that the inside of the C - CEX BTC appeared problem, according to the number of is you actually have a lot of times, but can't extract, so should be extracted to switch to other COINS

don't quite understand what you're saying here

my english is poor.I use the translation

i  mean you Deposit 1 BTC ,but 100 BTC  shown on the website,can't withdraw btc
so need exchange other COINS
 

The problem on ccex was a problem with email confirmations. No email arriving, no confirmation possible, no withdrawal.

I hope that they'll have added a button for manual resend button when they get back up. However the downtime of 12hrs+ is too much.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251
I heard that the inside of the C - CEX BTC appeared problem, according to the number of is you actually have a lot of times, but can't extract, so should be extracted to switch to other COINS

don't quite understand what you're saying here

my english is poor.I use the translation

i  mean you Deposit 1 BTC ,but 100 BTC  shown on the website,can't withdraw btc
so need exchange other COINS
Just listen to other people say so, don't know is true

 

newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
I heard that the inside of the C - CEX BTC appeared problem, according to the number of is you actually have a lot of times, but can't extract, so should be extracted to switch to other COINS

don't quite understand what you're saying here
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
I heard that the inside of the C - CEX BTC appeared problem, according to the number of is you actually have a lot of times, but can't extract, so should be extracted to switch to other COINS

do you want to try again?
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251
I heard that the inside of the C - CEX BTC appeared problem, according to the number of is you actually have a lot of times, but can't extract, so should be extracted to switch to other COINS
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
"#Darkcoin to go on @MintPalExchange. Someone dropped a 4.1btc donation through their voting competition for the addition of 2 alt markets."

https://blockchain.info/address/1L8VcGX2bHffuiNogj9eZChSWt6Vryhvwg

Wow.

If someone bought 200BTC of it, 4BTC to see it become a 500 or 800BTC is peanuts to them.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Maintenance will take about 12-15 hours

If you don't like to read FUD then skip this post.

I don't know what is going on but what would be better way to get massive incoming DRK and BTC deposits than faking some crazy buys and sells. The site must have all time high amounts of money right now.

I don't believe there is anything fake, nor that it was the same person doing the buying and selling. There is absolutely nothing to gain in pulling both directions and losing BTCs.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
DRK 0.0099 BTC is not impossible Cheesy
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
ill check out the p2pool-quark fork,

could you post the bitcoin network.py settings you are using for darkcoin ?


especially these:


        BLOCKHASH_FUNC=
        POW_FUNC=

        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=
        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=

thanks.

settings please

also, where is the x11-hash-python module?Huh
its no longer on github ---- 404 Error
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
"#Darkcoin to go on @MintPalExchange. Someone dropped a 4.1btc donation through their voting competition for the addition of 2 alt markets."

https://blockchain.info/address/1L8VcGX2bHffuiNogj9eZChSWt6Vryhvwg

Wow.
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
C-CEX.com ‏@CryptoCurrEncyX 

Maintenance will take about 12-15 hours


What the utter fuck?!

Very shady C-Cex. Very very shady. If you do actually come back to life I'm pulling out, give us a little heads up about your maintenance. Now every single user is worried about their coin. Thanks.

Fantastic.  Right after I deposit 160 DRK  Sad
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Personally I really, really, really doubt it has to do with location. It affects for sure, but only if your connection is lagging in terms of seconds. Otherwise, even if you are connected from the most remote part of the planet you'll still have 300-400ms ping times which is not enough to raise stales to 5%. I have 0.2s ping times and I'm like at 0.5% reject rate. When I emulate further delay by increasing bandwidth load in my adsl line, I don't get significantly more. So latency is clearly a lesser issue.

Run a cpuminer for a test and check its stales. If it's the same percentage after a day, you are right. If not, there's something wrong with GPU settings.

Okay you have me doubting my previous conclusions so I did some testing.  Below are the results with intensity different by 1 level.  I only ran these for 2 to 3 hours on each setting so it's not really a big enough sample size to draw firm conclusions about the rejects, but there seems to be a slight overall improvement on the lower intensity setting, accompanied by a whopping 23% drop in total hash rate, 50% in the case of GPU 2!  I can go as high as I:16 on GPU 0 and GPU 1 before all hell breaks loose.  I've never run a CPU miner, will give it a go when I find some more time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  62.0C 1786RPM | 1.535M/1.535Mh/s | R:  1.9% HW:0 WU:0.020/m I:12
 GPU 1:  60.0C 1256RPM | 1.535M/1.534Mh/s | R:  3.6% HW:0 WU:0.022/m I:12
 GPU 2:  81.0C 2935RPM | 477.8K/483.3Kh/s | R:  1.4% HW:0 WU:0.008/m I:10
 GPU 3:  48.0C  40%    | 1.100M/1.099Mh/s | R:  3.8% HW:0 WU:0.015/m I:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  65.0C 1893RPM | 1.879M/1.880Mh/s | R:  4.1% HW:0 WU:0.025/m I:13
 GPU 1:  62.0C 1314RPM | 1.882M/1.880Mh/s | R:  2.0% HW:0 WU:0.028/m I:13
 GPU 2:  78.0C 2610RPM | 942.6K/944.7Kh/s | R:  4.0% HW:0 WU:0.013/m I:11
 GPU 3:  44.0C  40%    | 1.403M/1.402Mh/s | R:  4.6% HW:0 WU:0.020/m I:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i found my older cards (6850, 7750) run best at I 16 while my r9 290x run well up to I 20 also i average about 5% rejects no matter what....
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
Personally I really, really, really doubt it has to do with location. It affects for sure, but only if your connection is lagging in terms of seconds. Otherwise, even if you are connected from the most remote part of the planet you'll still have 300-400ms ping times which is not enough to raise stales to 5%. I have 0.2s ping times and I'm like at 0.5% reject rate. When I emulate further delay by increasing bandwidth load in my adsl line, I don't get significantly more. So latency is clearly a lesser issue.

Run a cpuminer for a test and check its stales. If it's the same percentage after a day, you are right. If not, there's something wrong with GPU settings.

Okay you have me doubting my previous conclusions so I did some testing.  Below are the results with intensity different by 1 level.  I only ran these for 2 to 3 hours on each setting so it's not really a big enough sample size to draw firm conclusions about the rejects, but there seems to be a slight overall improvement on the lower intensity setting, accompanied by a whopping 23% drop in total hash rate, 50% in the case of GPU 2!  I can go as high as I:16 on GPU 0 and GPU 1 before all hell breaks loose.  I've never run a CPU miner, will give it a go when I find some more time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  62.0C 1786RPM | 1.535M/1.535Mh/s | R:  1.9% HW:0 WU:0.020/m I:12
 GPU 1:  60.0C 1256RPM | 1.535M/1.534Mh/s | R:  3.6% HW:0 WU:0.022/m I:12
 GPU 2:  81.0C 2935RPM | 477.8K/483.3Kh/s | R:  1.4% HW:0 WU:0.008/m I:10
 GPU 3:  48.0C  40%    | 1.100M/1.099Mh/s | R:  3.8% HW:0 WU:0.015/m I:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  65.0C 1893RPM | 1.879M/1.880Mh/s | R:  4.1% HW:0 WU:0.025/m I:13
 GPU 1:  62.0C 1314RPM | 1.882M/1.880Mh/s | R:  2.0% HW:0 WU:0.028/m I:13
 GPU 2:  78.0C 2610RPM | 942.6K/944.7Kh/s | R:  4.0% HW:0 WU:0.013/m I:11
 GPU 3:  44.0C  40%    | 1.403M/1.402Mh/s | R:  4.6% HW:0 WU:0.020/m I:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
C-CEX.com ‏@CryptoCurrEncyX 

Maintenance will take about 12-15 hours


What the utter fuck?!

Very shady C-Cex. Very very shady. If you do actually come back to life I'm pulling out, give us a little heads up about your maintenance. Now every single user is worried about their coin. Thanks.

Yes this is really sketchy. Hopefully it'll come back on and we all won't lose our coins..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Maintenance will take about 12-15 hours

If you don't like to read FUD then skip this post.

I don't know what is going on but what would be better way to get massive incoming DRK and BTC deposits than faking some crazy buys and sells. The site must have all time high amounts of money right now.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
what major market will dark be added to?
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
C-CEX.com ‏@CryptoCurrEncyX 

Maintenance will take about 12-15 hours


What the utter fuck?!
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
I'm betting on someone is trying to do a major buy because we are about to be listed on a major exchange, I had been watching the markets pretty closely the last couple days and someone appeared to be trying their hardest to keep the price less than .002.

Me too, and I completely concur on the whole sub .002 thing.
Jump to: