Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6896. (Read 9723475 times)

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Funny that you would say that...it was my first thoughts as well!  Using that ideology...group and myself are putting together the capital to start a small alt currency exchange with that exact thought process!  Being in Canada...I think it would be great that you could go to a brick and mortar office and meet the people that handle your exchanges & money...I think that is super important.  You can keep your financial affairs private...but those that handle your funds should always be accessable.... I have the beginings of a great team already that have done several banking institutional sites with ISO 9362 standards.  Missing is someone/peeps to create a great front end and logistics for the actual exchange.  Any thoughts on how this could be looked at would be great.

Your best bet for getting an exchange up & running quickly/cheaply would be to fork buttercoin:

https://github.com/buttercoin/buttercoin

It's an open-source crypto exchange.

Thanks.  It may sound a bit jammy that this site has inspired me.  It would be woefully naive of me or anyone embarking on such a task in establishing an alto exchange given the post-Mt. Gox environment to take the responsibility of others money, lifely hood and financial well being without the most critical attention to detail.  Mt. Gox is just the tip of the iceburg for what will surely be the continuation of larger hacking and system attacks.  The shear monumental task of trying to mitigate what the "Dark" (pun intended) forces of human greed and villainous nature can never be underestimated. Thus why really DarkCoin must be made...to protect ourselves from those that would strife to strip us our "property".  The building of an exchange must take these realities to heart.  I'm wondering if something like this could be partially funded by crowd sourcing?  


I think you just wrote the opening pitch on the kickstarter page...
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Funny that you would say that...it was my first thoughts as well!  Using that ideology...group and myself are putting together the capital to start a small alt currency exchange with that exact thought process!  Being in Canada...I think it would be great that you could go to a brick and mortar office and meet the people that handle your exchanges & money...I think that is super important.  You can keep your financial affairs private...but those that handle your funds should always be accessable.... I have the beginings of a great team already that have done several banking institutional sites with ISO 9362 standards.  Missing is someone/peeps to create a great front end and logistics for the actual exchange.  Any thoughts on how this could be looked at would be great.

Your best bet for getting an exchange up & running quickly/cheaply would be to fork buttercoin:

https://github.com/buttercoin/buttercoin

It's an open-source crypto exchange.

Thanks.  It may sound a bit jammy that this site has inspired me.  It would be woefully naive of me or anyone embarking on such a task in establishing an alto exchange given the post-Mt. Gox environment to take the responsibility of others money, lifely hood and financial well being without the most critical attention to detail.  Mt. Gox is just the tip of the iceburg for what will surely be the continuation of larger hacking and system attacks.  The shear monumental task of trying to mitigate what the "Dark" (pun intended) forces of human greed and villainous nature can never be underestimated. Thus why really DarkCoin must be made...to protect ourselves from those that would strife to strip us our "property".  The building of an exchange must take these realities to heart.  I'm wondering if something like this could be partially funded by crowd sourcing?  

I just shed a patriotic crypto tear reading that.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Is it just me or has the network difficulty rate been bouncing around like crazy today?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Funny that you would say that...it was my first thoughts as well!  Using that ideology...group and myself are putting together the capital to start a small alt currency exchange with that exact thought process!  Being in Canada...I think it would be great that you could go to a brick and mortar office and meet the people that handle your exchanges & money...I think that is super important.  You can keep your financial affairs private...but those that handle your funds should always be accessable.... I have the beginings of a great team already that have done several banking institutional sites with ISO 9362 standards.  Missing is someone/peeps to create a great front end and logistics for the actual exchange.  Any thoughts on how this could be looked at would be great.

Your best bet for getting an exchange up & running quickly/cheaply would be to fork buttercoin:

https://github.com/buttercoin/buttercoin

It's an open-source crypto exchange.

Thanks.  It may sound a bit jammy that this site has inspired me.  It would be woefully naive of me or anyone embarking on such a task in establishing an alto exchange given the post-Mt. Gox environment to take the responsibility of others money, lifely hood and financial well being without the most critical attention to detail.  Mt. Gox is just the tip of the iceburg for what will surely be the continuation of larger hacking and system attacks.  The shear monumental task of trying to mitigate what the "Dark" (pun intended) forces of human greed and villainous nature can never be underestimated. Thus why really DarkCoin must be made...to protect ourselves from those that would strife to strip us our "property".  The building of an exchange must take these realities to heart.  I'm wondering if something like this could be partially funded by crowd sourcing?  
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Got another wall there. Wondering if it will bounce.

Strong buy support above .0006. With the difficulty growth and other good news and growing interest I could see .0008 easily happening by the end of today.

Trades executing at .0008 now, this is exploding even faster than I expected.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Very Nice!
I tried to compile it yesterday for windows and I usually can figure things out...but I spent like 4-5 hrs with no luck
Cherry picking some data without waiting to long. Win7/64  i74930 @ 4.5

Old 1.2c = all threads  ~700kh / half threads ~560kh

i7 avx-i = all threads  ~880kh +25%+ (somehow bounced to 915kh for a while once) / Half threads ~700h +25%  (lower power and significantly cooler)
i7-avx = ~880kh +25%
avx-aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~880kh +25%
aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~820kh +17%

For comparison purposes:

Slightly overclocked (800 to 820 MHz) GPU Radeon 5830: 660KH/s
Fully overclocked (775 to 960MHz) GPU Radeon 6850: 785KH/s




IT made an even bigger difference on my 5650 Xeons.

2x Xeon 5650s in a Dell R610:

old 1.2 - ~390Kh/s
1.3 - ~773Kh/s

Your results may vary. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Apparently the GPU miner can't handle pools going down? It didn't switch to backup pool, and when the first pool was up again it didn't connect to that either. Had to quit and restart it. Is it working ok for others?

For me it does.

Ok maybe it was just me and my unlucky Windows install / drivers combo / one time occurrence.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Apparently the GPU miner can't handle pools going down? It didn't switch to backup pool, and when the first pool was up again it didn't connect to that either. Had to quit and restart it. Is it working ok for others?

For me it does.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Guys/Gals,
This what I get when I run the debug command for sgminer. Can anyone tell me what I can try to get sgminer working. I hate to keep asking rookie questions but I really like where this coin is going and besides, I guess this is how you learn. Smiley Any feedback would be great. Thanks.

....


Hey. Error 11 is very broad but I see you are running a 5000 series Radeon card and most people had the same issue. I managed to fix it on a machine running a 5970 and another running two 5770s

The issue is mainly in your settings, primarily thread concurrency causing the display drivers to fail launching.

1. Use something like this for your .bat
Quote
sgminer --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://pool.darkcoin.io:3333 -u accountname.worker -p password -I 17 -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 3200

I've found on both types of 5xxx cards if I try bumping thread concurrency any higher you will get Error 11, same with turning down worksize. I'm working on a fix for this now but in the mean time that should do it.

2. If the above fails, get the latest Beta display driver (14.1) from AMD from their website (and use the same settings)

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop?os=Windows%207%20-%2064

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

That should get you up and running for now, it worked for 2 of my machines and a few others on this board. Let me know if you have any more problems.
I've tried changing the thread-concurrency to 3200 and tried adding the --no-adl and it still didn't work. I have the latest driver as well. Honestly though, I've tried so many different combinations of things now, I'm not sure if I tried those both in the same .bat file. I'll give it another go. Thanks for the response. I haven't created a .conf file yet but seems as if creating the right .bat file first should at least get me started. Once I settle on some settings, then I can create a .conf
Been fiddling with settings all day and still getting:
Code:
Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!
 Failed to init GPU thread 2, disabling device 2

I am using a config file. My GPUs are the following: ASUS 6990, HIS 5770 and driver version is 13.251.0.0
I just tried the latest beta display driver with no changes in my situation.

I've been following Syth's posts and their replies with interest because I've had a similar problem with the windows GPU miner (the CPU miner has been fine for me). I've tried the various suggestions as they've been offered, but no luck yet.

My error 11 gives a detailed message "cannot open source file blake.cl" that I have not seen mentioned elsewhere. I don't recognize the filename.

Oh, the graphics card I'm using is an R9 290X. I always get the same error message, regardless of drivers and changes to arguments - thread-concurrency and so forth.

Thanks for any suggestions - and perhaps something here will help Syth also.
 
blake.cl is in the kernel folder
either move it to the main folder or put the kernel path to that directory and see if that helps
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Very Nice!
I tried to compile it yesterday for windows and I usually can figure things out...but I spent like 4-5 hrs with no luck
Cherry picking some data without waiting to long. Win7/64  i74930 @ 4.5

Old 1.2c = all threads  ~700kh / half threads ~560kh

i7 avx-i = all threads  ~880kh +25%+ (somehow bounced to 915kh for a while once) / Half threads ~700h +25%  (lower power and significantly cooler)
i7-avx = ~880kh +25%
avx-aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~880kh +25%
aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~820kh +17%

For comparison purposes:

Slightly overclocked (800 to 820 MHz) GPU Radeon 5830: 660KH/s
Fully overclocked (775 to 960MHz) GPU Radeon 6850: 785KH/s


newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
http://pool.darkcoin.io/

Please

P.P.S. Someone that have a rent of Xeon instances can do the math Khs per $?

I get about 4250 kh/s for $24/day

Also, sent you a little tip for the 25% increase in hashrate your cpu miner gave me, keep up the good work.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I'm finally building the windows binaries of the new CPU-miner. After that I'll try to improve the performances Smiley .

For who said that GPU version is always better. Maybe this is the case, maybe it's not. It depends if and how much the code can be parallelized.
I'll try to see what CPU can achieve. And if it's not enough, I'll study the convenience to mix CPU and GPU, if I'll see that some algo cant be well parallelized on the  GPU Smiley

+5 DRK my friend - I wish I had more, but with the help of your miner, hopefully more to come. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 272
1xbit.com
Apparently the GPU miner can't handle pools going down? It didn't switch to backup pool, and when the first pool was up again it didn't connect to that either. Had to quit and restart it. Is it working ok for others?

Mine came back up by itself. I'm using the linux gpu miner with no backup pool specified.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Apparently the GPU miner can't handle pools going down? It didn't switch to backup pool, and when the first pool was up again it didn't connect to that either. Had to quit and restart it. Is it working ok for others?
full member
Activity: 281
Merit: 100
I'm finally building the windows binaries of the new CPU-miner. After that I'll try to improve the performances Smiley .

Ok, here the link for the Windows binaries -> https://mega.co.nz/#!pBZzQAII!yuvzhcnx3ezLre9fek_G67D0_IyiNqIbEHKY4cKdovA
Read the README for choose the right version for your processor.
Remember, only Windows 64 bit, and only for processors that supports at least AES-NI instructions.


P.S. I hate and I still hate compiling binaries on MinGW, I spent 2 days to set a working crosscompiling environment for this.
The problem was that new versions of build of MinGW64 have a gcc that is hard linked with a new pthread library, called libwinpthread, that it's not good for compiling this... thanks to ig0tik3d for pointing to me the working version of MinGW64...

Very Nice!
I tried to compile it yesterday for windows and I usually can figure things out...but I spent like 4-5 hrs with no luck
Cherry picking some data without waiting to long. Win7/64  i74930 @ 4.5

Old 1.2c = all threads  ~700kh / half threads ~560kh

i7 avx-i = all threads  ~880kh +25%+ (somehow bounced to 915kh for a while once) / Half threads ~700h +25%  (lower power and significantly cooler)
i7-avx = ~880kh +25%
avx-aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~880kh +25%
aes-sse2-sss3  =  ~820kh +17%

Personally I like the half thread option, it performs faster than the previous version 1.2c all threads.  The machine is then still usable and cooler. I don't really care about power draw.
CPU mining is still fine with dark I think, that being said.... CPU mining only people are the biggest bunch of crybabies ever.. I wish there was an ignore button for them.  

You deserve a tip.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
eduf, your pool is down.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
elmad's new cpu miner yielded significant improvements.

Here are some stats for those interested:

CPU: i7-4770 (stock)
Hash rate: 570 KH/s
Power draw: 80 watts (~87% efficient PSU)

GPU: R9 290 (Elpida, 1000/1500/20%, no undervolt)
Hash rate: 2250 KH/s
Power draw: 188 watts (~87% efficient PSU)

The GPU miner does seem to be far more cpu intensive, though.  Giving it one thread while CPU mining doesn't seem to be enough, which is not something that's ever happened with other algorithms (which usually only use between 5-15% of one thread).

Everything goes by so fast, I can't remember what elmad did?  In what way did he change darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3?

This was using 1.3, which only recently had a windows binary compiled for it.  So 'new' to the non-Linux folk.  :3
Jump to: