[ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ Ring Signatures | Anonymous | TOR | Stealth Addresses - page 10.

stoner19

hero member

Activity: 752

Merit: 500

Quote from: johnnysof on March 01, 2016, 02:48:25 PM

Quote from: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 02:22:58 PM

Quote from: stoner19 on March 01, 2016, 09:51:45 AM

Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk.

Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining.

Happy mining everyone!

Nice, this is awesome.

Seriously? Which total supply? I expect not the total coins supply, but the coins mined at your pool. Also .25% means probably 0.25%, so with other words you just reduce your fees from 2% to 1.75%. The other pool takes only 1%, I think you need other strategy...

Correct, 0.25% BONUS from the TOTAL SUPPLY. I'm not reducing fees.

kondiomir

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 1000

Twitter @Acimirov

Maybe..

johnnysof

hero member

Activity: 534

Merit: 500

Quote from: NextGenCrypto on March 01, 2016, 02:22:58 PM

Quote from: stoner19 on March 01, 2016, 09:51:45 AM

Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk.

Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining.

Happy mining everyone!

Nice, this is awesome.

Seriously? Which total supply? I expect not the total coins supply, but the coins mined at your pool. Also .25% means probably 0.25%, so with other words you just reduce your fees from 2% to 1.75%. The other pool takes only 1%, I think you need other strategy...

NextGenCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: stoner19 on March 01, 2016, 09:51:45 AM

Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk.

Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining.

Happy mining everyone!

Nice, this is awesome.

Eclipse Crypto

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:17:28 PM

Quote from: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 12:15:18 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head??

I don't own any SDC. Your constructive, well-mannered criticisms are appreciated. Your other behavior is not.

We can tell by your avatar that you don't own any SDC.

Eclipse Crypto

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:18:55 PM

Quote from: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 12:15:18 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head??

He sounds exactly like that.
I posted the same concerns in XMR thread and managed to receive alot of input and we managed to have some productive discussions about it
I post in SDC and auto deleted and called spamming.

That's great to hear and we appreciate any constructive feedback, especially from those experienced in the XMR community.

Bank_sy

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 12:15:18 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head??

He sounds exactly like that.
I posted the same concerns in XMR thread and managed to receive alot of input and we managed to have some productive discussions about it
I post in SDC and auto deleted and called spamming.

Wheatclove

hero member

Activity: 606

Merit: 500

Quote from: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 12:15:18 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head??

I don't own any SDC. Your constructive, well-mannered criticisms are appreciated. Your other behavior is not.

Eclipse Crypto

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

You sound to me like a scared SDC bagholder. Did I hit the nail on the head??

Bank_sy

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:10:40 PM

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

My post was a very reasonable one and was not an attack on SDC in anyway.
It looks like my post was deleted, SDC thread has heavier censoring than I expected.... What are you guys so afraid of? I had interest in SDC before but it is quickly fading.
They may be testing a fix but if other ways to fix are present, they should be looking at those ways too (if they are competent devs).
This is not 'my' coin.. It is simply a coin that claims to have fixed the flaw in SDC so I have taken some interest in it.

Wheatclove

hero member

Activity: 606

Merit: 500

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

You claim to post a fix, but your posts contain much more than the actual proposed fix. You're posting an advertisement for this coin that attacks SDC. Twice you've done this. It doesn't concern SDC.

The devs have implemented a fix on the testnet awhile ago and have been testing since.

I'd focus on your own coin if I were you.

Eclipse Crypto

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bank_sy on March 01, 2016, 12:01:30 PM

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

SDC looks to be converging on a reasonable fix, but not a recommended one.

Originally, they took the scalar hash then multiplied it by the private key and then used it for the scalar multiple of the group generator (two different types of "multiply" here but I didn't invent this convention). Math looks like

I = H(K_i)xG

That was the very wrong way.

Now they take an arbitrary point on the curve by hashing the time stamp, trying to map it to a point, then using that point as a generator. This takes advantage of the fact that all curve points on a prime field can be full generators. The new generator is G*

I = H(K_i)xG*

There is a relationship between G and G*, namely one is a multiple of the of the other:

G = aG*

But in this case G* is "unknown log", so G is protected by discrete log hardness.

In general, however, it is not good to try to use a generator to hash scalars to a curve. They already learned this lesson once.

Bank_sy

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: Wheatclove on March 01, 2016, 12:00:18 PM

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

I don't see any spamming in the thread... I posted the 'fix' to SDCs anonymity bug because it concerns SDC, does it not?
What I posted is very relevant to SDC. It's not like I was talking about rainbows and butterflies.

Wheatclove

hero member

Activity: 606

Merit: 500

Why are you guys spamming the SDC thread and Slack?

Bank_sy

sr. member

Activity: 450

Merit: 250

Quote from: Eclipse Crypto on March 01, 2016, 11:16:47 AM

Quote from: blacklizard on March 01, 2016, 06:42:47 AM

If one says that SDC is not anonymous then that person doesn't know how to bloody use it (right).

No SDC got bloody de-anoned 100%.

If you think you are using at anonymously, you are bloody mistaken.

here is the link for SDC anonymity flaw

https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/

Eclipse Crypto

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: blacklizard on March 01, 2016, 06:42:47 AM

If one says that SDC is not anonymous then that person doesn't know how to bloody use it (right).

No SDC got bloody de-anoned 100%.

If you think you are using at anonymously, you are bloody mistaken.

stoner19

hero member

Activity: 752

Merit: 500

Over the course of the next 3 weeks or so I'll be distributing a fairly significant bonus (equal .25% of the total supply) to all miners who use superninjapool.tk.

Bonuses will be sent out separately from mining payouts near the end of each week and will be distributed based on a workers accepted shares for EC mining.

Happy mining everyone!

chrisvl

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1006

Trainman

Quote from: allyouracid on March 01, 2016, 07:23:23 AM

Quote from: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 05:57:58 PM

Quote from: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 05:47:47 PM

hth

logfile.txt

https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN

seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found !

sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that

ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274

Lol, you really cannot just remove random lines from the code and tell people that you "solved a problem". It's like when I say, "I got it to compile. I went to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin and cloned the source, copied all files in there, went back to the eclipse source, removed all files and pasted the files from my clipboard into that directory. Then, I was able to compile without errors."
Every line in the code has its purpose, and by deleting stuff, you just delay the problems to later.
You have to solve problems by setting up the dependencies. No way around that.

personally not studied the code i have no time,to me work fine I tried to help

allyouracid

legendary

Activity: 2322

Merit: 1292

Encrypted Money, Baby!

Quote from: chrisvl on February 28, 2016, 05:57:58 PM

Quote from: glen123 on February 28, 2016, 05:47:47 PM

hth

logfile.txt

https://copy.com/IONneq2mTBKRUOVN

seems that one : g++: error: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a: not found !

sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev does not fix that

ii solved removing this line https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/blob/master/src/makefile.unix#L274

Lol, you really cannot just remove random lines from the code and tell people that you "solved a problem". It's like when I say, "I got it to compile. I went to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin and cloned the source, copied all files in there, went back to the eclipse source, removed all files and pasted the files from my clipboard into that directory. Then, I was able to compile without errors."
Every line in the code has its purpose, and by deleting stuff, you just delay the problems to later.
You have to solve problems by setting up the dependencies. No way around that.

chrisvl

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1006

Trainman

https://ec.suprnova.cc 460 ths network hashrate 1 + phs

Topic: [ANN][EC]▲ Eclipse ▲ Ring Signatures | Anonymous | TOR | Stealth Addresses - page 10. (Read 29672 times)