[ANN]Faircoin - MULTIPOOL PAYS --- 20%--- BONUS! for the next week!! - page 102.

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

watch mintpal faircoin is about to break the 3k sat Tongue

2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002800   34447.29642857   0.96452431
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002800   44.00000000   0.00123200
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002800   10.00000000   0.00027999
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002800   1000.00000000   0.02800000
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002800   500.00000000   0.01400000
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002799   1802.27421134   0.05044565
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002798   1500.00000000   0.04197000
2014-04-12 20:55:12   BUY   0.00002798   500.00000000   0.01399000
2014-04-12 20:55:04   SELL   0.00002796   1406.33636819   0.03932118
2014-04-12 20:55:02   BUY   0.00002797   24120.00000000   0.67463640

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

Quote from: Sebastien256 on April 12, 2014, 03:50:07 PM

HOw we know the protocol we are using?

Debug window

Type: getinfo

Sebastien256

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

HOw we know the protocol we are using?

fair-cointeam

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: DailyModo on April 12, 2014, 03:40:04 PM

New wallet is updated in op?

links are always up to date in OP and website
(website + clear cache = safest possible)

avoid quotes from posts with links

TrollboxChamp

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: fair-cointeam on April 12, 2014, 03:41:31 PM

personally i think blackcoin is an amazing coin, and it deserves every bit of credit it gets in the form of market value
and i only wish i had bought some when i first heard about it

that being said, please stop bashing faircoin in order to promote blackcoin
this isn't a competition
the coins have a lot of common technically, but the ideas behind them is quite different

if you don't like faircoin, don't buy any and stop trolling
thanks

Well said.

I had 500k black coins i sold for a measly 14btc.

I am not fucking up with my faircoins.

drumingspz

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: Kreativekrypto on April 12, 2014, 03:35:20 PM

Quote from: fair-cointeam on April 12, 2014, 03:32:58 PM

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

Approx. when is next multipool payout please?

+1

fair-cointeam

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

personally i think blackcoin is an amazing coin, and it deserves every bit of credit it gets in the form of market value
and i only wish i had bought some when i first heard about it

that being said, please stop bashing faircoin in order to promote blackcoin
this isn't a competition
the coins have a lot of common technically, but the ideas behind them is quite different

if you don't like faircoin, don't buy any and stop trolling
thanks

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

Quote from: fair-cointeam on April 12, 2014, 03:32:58 PM

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

New wallet is updated in op?

ene1980

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 535

FAC on http://www.cryptmarketcap.com/

Kreativekrypto

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: fair-cointeam on April 12, 2014, 03:32:58 PM

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

Approx. when is next multipool payout please?

fair-cointeam

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

TrollboxChamp

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

The blackcoin boys are shakin in their booties!!

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 03:18:53 PM

Quote from: DailyModo on April 12, 2014, 03:12:17 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 03:09:57 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 03:00:39 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there. Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind. I know I got my shares, a lot of people did. the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot Wink

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

Once again you can't address anything I say.

I will let the readers judge my comments and decide whether to invest in un-faircoin.

Ok captain! lol

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: DailyModo on April 12, 2014, 03:12:17 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 03:09:57 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 03:00:39 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there. Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind. I know I got my shares, a lot of people did. the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot Wink

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

Once again you can't address anything I say.

I will let the readers judge my comments and decide whether to invest in un-faircoin.

Kreativekrypto

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

ugh scrypt coins profit is in the shitter, at least with my m/h

http://wafflepool.com/miner/14yX6HDH8nbp5gZzNz1T37Eu3n9bskGFZ1

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 03:09:57 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 03:00:39 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there. Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind. I know I got my shares, a lot of people did. the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot Wink

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 03:00:39 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there. Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind. I know I got my shares, a lot of people did. the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot Wink

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

DailyModo

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

www.gamebet.gg

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:57:15 PM

Quote from: DailyModo on April 12, 2014, 02:50:29 PM

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

100 adresses of black coins only have 40% of the whole coins talk to me about fairness my friend haha.

Lol just a big group of potential dumpers who got their coins for the SO SO fair BC POW mining lol talking about ridiculous eh.

You strengthen my argument by not being able to respond to my points. Thanks

lol the thing is you have no point! haha keep promoting faircoin im starting to love u

unick

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 254

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:56:10 PM

That coin already exists and it's called Blackcoin. The true faircoin.

Lol, I didn't realize this was a propaganda campaign... I'm finished on this subject.

unick

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 254

Quote from: mr_random on April 12, 2014, 02:47:16 PM

Quote from: unick on April 12, 2014, 02:40:50 PM

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there. Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind. I know I got my shares, a lot of people did. the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot Wink

Topic: [ANN]Faircoin - MULTIPOOL PAYS --- 20%--- BONUS! for the next week!! - page 102. (Read 341944 times)