EARN FREE DAILY Bitcoin and LTC FTC. No catches. Sign up? Get coins. It works.
http://qoinpro.com/c4a4d77d3cea7f3abf7505164e9966a9
http://qoinpro.com/c4a4d77d3cea7f3abf7505164e9966a9
Not this thread dude.
Topic: [ANN]Faircoin - MULTIPOOL PAYS --- 20%--- BONUS! for the next week!! - page 336. (Read 341962 times)
March 10, 2014, 07:26:26 AM
Not this thread dude.
March 10, 2014, 07:18:06 AM
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Unless I'm mistaking, I think creating a new address for the change is the default behaviour of the official bitcoin client, and its forks.
See the related topic here: https://bitcoin.org/en/protect-your-privacy
March 10, 2014, 07:13:35 AM
March 10, 2014, 07:05:51 AM
Have voted over 70 times now, still a long way to go...
March 10, 2014, 07:04:57 AM
Few miners are gathering on Freenode #faircoin for a discussion on Faircoin. Dev and fellow miners welcome!
March 10, 2014, 07:02:06 AM
March 10, 2014, 06:56:20 AM
Not many people in the irc channel... Do they even know it's there?
Give us a link
March 10, 2014, 06:51:22 AM
Not many people in the irc channel... Do they even know it's there?
March 10, 2014, 06:37:49 AM
Has anyone looked at the activity on the block explorer http://coin.ww9.me/?
The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
When you send coins to 1 address and you have any remainder you get back it by default on a new address.
March 10, 2014, 06:34:38 AM
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Unless I'm mistaking, I think creating a new address for the change is the default behaviour of the official bitcoin client, and its forks.
See the related topic here: https://bitcoin.org/en/protect-your-privacy
March 10, 2014, 06:31:16 AM
Has anyone looked at the activity on the block explorer http://coin.ww9.me/?
The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
I don't really understand all the technicalities behind this but maybe that's got something to do with the fact that some people didn't register the same address over and over again but instead generated a new address on their wallet every time? The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
March 10, 2014, 06:24:22 AM
Has anyone looked at the activity on the block explorer http://coin.ww9.me/?
The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
March 10, 2014, 06:21:47 AM
blocks 536,it's not sync now!!!!!!!!!!!!!
March 10, 2014, 06:11:40 AM
Just received 1000 FAC. I think my token was somewhere around #10000.
March 10, 2014, 06:08:52 AM
Hey, worth a shot right fPXb3Q2VpKwA2HG1SRnTdRH4dXAKjjqeaU
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
I'll send you a stake share if they actually get paid out.
Sent 1000. Hopefully they get to you.
They did reach him
http://162.243.224.140:1080/address/fPXb3Q2VpKwA2HG1SRnTdRH4dXAKjjqeaU
It shows NVC not FAC
March 10, 2014, 06:08:40 AM
Just recieved 1000 FAC. Thanks!!
March 10, 2014, 05:57:43 AM
Gave +13 votes on cryptorush. Now it has 497 votes.
March 10, 2014, 05:56:56 AM
Hey, worth a shot right fPXb3Q2VpKwA2HG1SRnTdRH4dXAKjjqeaU
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
I'll send you a stake share if they actually get paid out.
Sent 1000. Hopefully they get to you.
They did reach him
http://162.243.224.140:1080/address/fPXb3Q2VpKwA2HG1SRnTdRH4dXAKjjqeaU
March 10, 2014, 05:56:00 AM
I'm still waiting for mine but I know they should be around the corner. 
The coins are being sent in the order the addresses were inserted in. We will not go up on any exchange before ALL the coins have been sent out.
The coins are being sent in the order the addresses were inserted in. We will not go up on any exchange before ALL the coins have been sent out.
And this is good approach. Can't wait for my coins
OK, Now my 1000.00 FAC are in the cassaforte. Delivery time: 2m ago.
March 10, 2014, 05:51:18 AM
Hey, worth a shot right fPXb3Q2VpKwA2HG1SRnTdRH4dXAKjjqeaU
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
Got wallet all set, and got token/address in well in advance, before even 800 people had been in. Hopefully it all works out. I really like the ideas here.
I'll send you a stake share if they actually get paid out.
Sent 1000. Hopefully they get to you.
Jump to: