Topic: [ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit | Building Lightning Network - page 190. (Read 558212 times)

great coin, thanks for the work. ASIC's are on the horizon, some already began operating them but not against groestl coin.

price is also extremely low given very professional execution and stability of the operation. I say and not at all biased or driven by self interest this coin belongs in the top tier.

http://www.groestl.info/groestl-implementation-guide.pdf



efficient implementation techniques?
inspiration for further optimizations?
improvements, on x86 CPUs as well as on new platforms?
NEON byte permute instructions can be used to speed-up Grøstl on new ARM platforms?

Sounds good to me.

Just wait to u get to the bit about bit-slicing…

Ultimate PoW still waiting to be unleashed…

Hi Groestlers (and cyphermonks )

Here is the new Mac wallet, together with a message from instacash who compiled it.
Many thanks instacash.

Obviously we'll have to update this walet soon (hard fork coming) but I thought it might provide some cheer + we can admire its gørgeøusness!

As ever, pls tip instacash as I did,

CH
\Ø/

Guys, srcxxx will keep up a developer's blog on our GRS forum.
Speaking of which, please we welcome everybody to join & contribute there, so we can have a solid community behind our coin.

hmm i could have sworn i read somewhere in this thread someone had mentioned it and that thier speed went up from 3.3mhs to around the 7mhs mark.

This is the first time I hear something like that.

The new ccMiner 1.0 does not include the new "killer Groestl" implementation we're all waiting for. Still waiting on that so Id expect speeds to be the same as before (whatever that is)

Network is still settling after recent excitement.
In any case we'll be hard forking to DGW v3 shortly which should mitigate some of the volatility (i think).

thanks

can someone share what speeds the nvidia 750 TI is getting with the new updated Nvidia miner?

and whats up with the difficulty, its bounceing around like a mofo.

I agree with that.
Also, it's been quite stable lately.

As for design, I like the http://max.1gh.com/ more.

I'm a small miner and I have consistently stuck with dwarfpool from the beginning. It is a simple and elegant website. It is reliable, has great features and is very functional. In my mind its UI is more Google and others are like Bing and Yahoo. I just like it better than the other pools I have tried.

I'm not trying to bash any of the other pool specifically, but as  whole I wish pools would focus more on function and less on style.

my 2 grs..

and don't let that Google comparison go to your head Atrides 

NEW POOL

http://coin-base.info/groestlcoin/

1% pool fee
payoutsystem prop
only 140 confirms
dynamic stratum 2-1024
stratumport 3433

8 core cpu
16 gb ram
2 x 256 gb ssd
serverplace france

Again, is it?

I'm not accusing you of anything and I think we exchanged many PMs yesterday and are on friendly terms.

As I already PMd you...

I agree that rebooting suprnova.cc may have fixed the network, but I don't see how that is possible. The timestamps of all suprnova blocks were incorrect only in web frontend.
But they were correct in block explorer.

While on the other hand, some timestamps from your server were wrong. See screenshots in previous posts.

I do not think that you deliberately did something to cause this.

Perhaps one of your miners was solving a block and setting wrong timestamp and it was backed up by a large pool and thus got confirmed.
I honestly don't know.

What I know is:
* I don't want to get into a fight with you. I think our last communications were quite friendly. If I have offended you, I apologize.
* We need to fork into DGWv3 to avoid stuff like this from happening
* I still think that having 40% - 60% of hash on one pool is bad. When one of the pools die, the balance shifts too much.


As for this item... I stand by it. I think that one pool having close to 50% of network is very bad.
As we've seen, when cryptohunger crashed, you had more than 50% for some time.
I want broader distribution of hashrate. And there is nothing personal in this.
Even from user's perspective. If you see a few pages back, when my pool went down, people straight away started talking about 51% attack.

Thanks

Gentlemen,

after having worked so well together please can we keep things cøøl?

Atrides - Im sure Evan has only respect for your pool

Consider the reputation of GRS and the members of the community when posting!
It is in all our interests to better serve Groestlcoin, which you have done so admirably in the last 36 hours.

THANK YOU TO THE DEV & ALL THE POOL OPS WHO WORKED TOGETHER TO HANDLE THIS SITUATION SO QUICKLY AND PROFESSIONALY

I LOVE THIS COIN: PLS STAY FOCUSED ON THE HARD FORK AHEAD AND KEEP WORKING WELL TOGETHER!

Pls focus on this part of the message:


with respect
CH

Do you write such a bullshit in your right mind or accuse dwarves again just using the situation??

Why do you prejudice the reputation of my pool to Dark' dev?? Yesterday by PM we found that the problem was not on my pool and not on my wallet.

After restart of suprnova server, the whole groestl-network came to the normal state! Since the same hour!

Ocminer, sorry, I wasn't and 'm not accusing anyone, everything can happen in such a complex crypto structure to everyone. I just defend myself, I find it unfair to public obviously wrong information

So, really "GREAT WORK" srcxxx!

Great work srcxxx, transparency is key!

Hi everyone!

The problem seem to haven been solved for a few hours now.
Great work everyone (especially pool operators)!

Difficulty is now in the 300 range and block time as designed.

Some explanation of the situation (how I see it):
 1) No coins were lost or stolen
 2) The number of coins we generated during last couple of days was 86% more than designed
 3) These extra coins were evenly distributed across miners and investors who were buying GRS
 4) Extra flow of coins has decreased the price of GRS at exchanges

What happens now:
 * The price of GRS will rise, since it is now hard to mine them
 * If you were plannnig to buy GRS now is a good time
 * We will fork in a few days to DGWv3 to avoid this happening in future (more on this below)

Has it harmed Groestlcoin?
A little bit in the short term.
But in the long term - I think it was actually a plus. The community didn't panic too much, pool operators have shown their support, we came up with a plan of fixing this and succeeded.

I have discussed this issue with DGW author and he is recommending that we fork into DGW v3, see below:



Keep on Groestling!

And please start moving to the new official forum. This thread is planned for retirement.


PS: Some images from dwarfpool (notice the raise of difficulty and decrease in the number of found blocks):

+1

thank you nomad1109

I will go post in the other thread as well, but if there is anything in DGW v3 that is desirable for other reasons then it doesn't make sense to not go straight to that version.

Just my thoughts, and I don't think this is too bad of a problem right now. Looks like everyone that is mining would be getting the benefit of the lowered difficulty so even though it is not the most desirable situation, it isn't horribly unfairly distributed to just one person (as far as I can see from what has been posted).

I am still all for GRS, I think it is a really great coin.

bump

Diff ~300 is prob where we should be at given Net Hashrate