Topic: [ANN][ICO] ⭐️⭐️⭐️COFFE - The platform for the management of crypto assets ⭐️⭐️⭐️ - page 26. (Read 6260 times)

Here there is a choice, if you are confident in your abilities,then manage your assets, if you wish, you can use the services of an expert, this is your decision.

Everyone has heard about success and this attracts new people every day, even the increased risks of losing money do not repel them.

We do not know how good your specialists are. Therefore, I want to know: is it possible to try to buy investment packages in demo mode w/o deposit?

Blockchain

I have nothing against the mining and the PoW algorithm for the confirmation of transactions in blockchain, but from the beginning this technology did not take a root ideologically in our project. For the illusory “increase of the value of records in the distributed register” the users of blockchain pay the commissions to a huge number of fans of simple solutions (mining farms), spending the computing power and energy on the tasks that can be successfully solved without them, using much less resources. The proof-of-stake (PoS) algorithm is, in my opinion, a much more advanced technology, but it also has the weakness to impose the payments for the blockchain on ordinary users in the form of network fees.

We expect the blockchain to be more simple and practical. In our coordinate system, the main place is given not to the miner / producer / validator and his desires, but to an ordinary user of the blockchain — an investor, a programmer, an ideologist, an expert and a beginner — from any sphere of activity. We don’t think outside of crypto sphere, but we think the “crypto sphere”. Crypto sphere must be convenient and useful to the common man.

We have identified the project EOSIO based on the DPoS algorithm for many reasons (this is a separate big question and we do not speak about it now). The free license and open source gave us the opportunity to make a legal fork of the EOS blockchain and start the practical implementation of our idea. We began a painstaking and very time-consuming process. But we had the main thing — a team of like-minded professionals: the ideologists, programmers, designers and marketers. And although there were no professionals among us in the field of “presentation”/ ”sale” of blockchain projects, we did not need them at that time. We decided: first the product, and everything else will be later.

You can get more information at the site https://coffe.io/

Let the enthusiasts work in the market now. But a lot of them. And they give a positive example of earnings, which attracts new customers to the cryptocurrency market.

We can safely say that new customers have already appeared on the market. Because they liked the successful investment, mining and cryptocurrency trading of their friends.

I can say for sure, the interest will not weaken, new people will appear, despite the fact that the cryptocurrency market is still young and is experiencing both ups and downs.

Anyone who is afraid of all his savings to trust a project expert, can allocate only some of the money for investing. And with the help of the main deposit to trade independently.

I think that togrovlya on the stock exchange can not be done for free because it needs to be supported and just the commission does it. Perhaps the project will provide some kind of services that can facilitate trade to traders.

Undoubtedly, with the new prices for cryptocurrency, there will be new people who want to make money on it. At the moment, there are only enthusiasts who believe in cryptocurrency

Investing is a full-fledged field of activity. Therefore, in order to fully understand this, you need to treat this as a job. Therefore, I believe that professionals can do it better.

Exchange

After we worked out the basis for the functioning of the PACK and the relationship between the Expert and investors, we were faced by the question: will we be interested for the existing crypto exchanges with such a product? Almost all of them have a completely different purpose of their existence. For them the quality of work is not important. The most important is the number of transactions. “The exchange is always in the plus”, because it has become a “pump”, in the form of commissions pumping the liquidity from the wallets of many players to its own wallet. Hence the stimulation of active trade and transactions, no matter what is the result for traders. We know the result, don’t we?

Of course, our goal would not be interesting to exchanges and, of course, we decided to build our own exchange, adapted to our main idea. And we are very lucky that our team includes a participant with an extensive experience — the architect of one of the established European exchanges.

You can get more information at the site https://coffe.io/

Such events very well cut off random people. Such lovers of quick money has always been and will be, it is normal that they will appear during price hikes.

Oh, you mentioned an important circumstance. Indeed, there are several investment and trading projects for the crypto market. Some projects are already in operation for some time.
The team of this project should do a lot to take its rightful place in its field.

I agree the more servicies offer the project, the more people use such servicies the more demands in tokens. So it is profitable for the platform to create on it different services.

Such projects usually use their tokens or coins. Anyone who wants to be a user of such a system is forced to buy project assets, thereby creating demand. Something like a micro model of the state.
Obviously, the packages will be evaluated, bought, sold per the assets of this project.

Yes they will use own coins on the platform and exchange will be used to exchange the coins to other currency. Exchange as I understand only the part of system. It is necessary to function the Coffe project.

When somebody risks his own money he think first and then make a dicission. Excpert have 30% of the PACK and there are a lot of users of the PACK. So expert is the bigest invesor of the pack with the moust sum of fund.

It is not always better to trust professionals. Perhaps you should study the object of investment in more detail and draw conclusions.

Oh, that would be too good. This is not a charity project . In this case, there is no risk for the investor. How could they pay losses? I think that those who spoke above correctly explained the essence of this “insurance”.