That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 18. (Read 97846 times)
That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
Yes, it was special. No one was worried that at some point there were like 50 unicorn projects worth a billion Dollars or more.
that's why a lot of people lost a lot of money. you gotta be careful where you invest.
That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
Yes, it was special. No one was worried that at some point there were like 50 unicorn projects worth a billion Dollars or more.
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
People don't want to buy because exchanges would be cheaper and projects can't gather Money because of that.
To be fair, 2017 ICOs were really overrated and money coming their way was too generous. I think what projects manage to raise now is the realistic amount. Just look at regular kick starters, they dont get nearly as much money ICOs got last year.
That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
Yes, and if you wanted 100% more money, you had to use the magic word "blockchain" ...
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
People don't want to buy because exchanges would be cheaper and projects can't gather Money because of that.
To be fair, 2017 ICOs were really overrated and money coming their way was too generous. I think what projects manage to raise now is the realistic amount. Just look at regular kick starters, they dont get nearly as much money ICOs got last year.
That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
People don't want to buy because exchanges would be cheaper and projects can't gather Money because of that.
To be fair, 2017 ICOs were really overrated and money coming their way was too generous. I think what projects manage to raise now is the realistic amount. Just look at regular kick starters, they dont get nearly as much money ICOs got last year.
true. but not everyone that participates in ICOs knows how to enter in the contract address at a dex to find out if the tokens are being sold cheaper.
I think most of them know. Maybe only private investors don't know and right now only Money are coming from them.
true. but not everyone that participates in ICOs knows how to enter in the contract address at a dex to find out if the tokens are being sold cheaper.
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
It is the problem of 2018 for icos.
People don't want to buy because exchanges would be cheaper and projects can't gather Money because of that.
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
But if there will be a token listing before the ICO, i can assume the ICO token price will follow the market price right?
that's the weird thing, because if the tokens are cheaper on the exchange, why would anyone buy in ICO?
Nobody would buy in ICO, yes.
Therefore you should avoid this scenario, especially in a bear market.
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
But if there will be a token listing before the ICO, i can assume the ICO token price will follow the market price right?
that's the weird thing, because if the tokens are cheaper on the exchange, why would anyone buy in ICO?
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
But if there will be a token listing before the ICO, i can assume the ICO token price will follow the market price right?
I also doubt that the listing will be next month as nothing has really changed and since an MVP is missing a listing would probably turn into a bloodbath.
Listing in a decent exchange would also cost a lot, and clearly there are not much money to be invested on that. Let's see how it will turn out vut I'm not very confident.
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
It might be delayed because of poor exchange conditions right now and i would gladly see them not to force it because of community pressure. New year is kind of mental barrier and a lot can change in the next few weeks.
I also doubt that the listing will be next month as nothing has really changed and since an MVP is missing a listing would probably turn into a bloodbath.
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
It might be delayed because of poor exchange conditions right now and i would gladly see them not to force it because of community pressure. New year is kind of mental barrier and a lot can change in the next few weeks.
so if the roadmap is followed the tokens should be listed on the exchanges in january 2019, i hope it happens because i'm curious to see their real value given by the market
This is a quote from October. If they will stick to this roadmap, they should list their token on exchanges next month already. I dont have any information if this is still their plan.
Let's see if any other detail is coming up to clarify it.
Somewhere at the begin of the next year they should be putting the token in some exchange as well, was this happening before the mvp or no date was set yet?
Correct!
| ___________________ | ___________________ |
| PRE-ICO 1 stage | done! |
| PRE-ICO 2 stage | December 2018 |
| Exchanges | January 2019 |
| MVP | March 2019 |
| ICO Round 1 | after MVP |
| ___________________ | ___________________ |
This is a quote from October. If they will stick to this roadmap, they should list their token on exchanges next month already. I dont have any information if this is still their plan.
Yes and this is the next big question mark. Antipoff came out of nowhere, said that he speaks in the name of nkryuchkov and disappeared again.
The whole marketing is a catastrophe, hope they will develop in this area.
So if table is true, exchanges next month?
I highly doubt it
Somewhere at the begin of the next year they should be putting the token in some exchange as well, was this happening before the mvp or no date was set yet?
Correct!
| ___________________ | ___________________ |
| PRE-ICO 1 stage | done! |
| PRE-ICO 2 stage | December 2018 |
| Exchanges | January 2019 |
| MVP | March 2019 |
| ICO Round 1 | after MVP |
| ___________________ | ___________________ |
This is a quote from October. If they will stick to this roadmap, they should list their token on exchanges next month already. I dont have any information if this is still their plan.
Yes and this is the next big question mark. Antipoff came out of nowhere, said that he speaks in the name of nkryuchkov and disappeared again.
The whole marketing is a catastrophe, hope they will develop in this area.
Jump to: