Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 315. (Read 97848 times)

full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
March 07, 2018, 12:01:15 PM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
So i think it will be better to focus on the other important things rather than thinking about providing a voting system, ehfirst token already has a great value according to what they've promised on the whitepaper.

Yes,  There are many important things waiting for us to develop focus the health first.
newbie
Activity: 201
Merit: 0
March 07, 2018, 11:49:53 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Director in AI and ML Eray Ozkural:
Why I’m a Team member at eHealth First?

https://youtu.be/s1fHiRDdRe0

Hello there. My name is Eray Ozkural. I am the AI director of EHealth First platform. I’ve obtained my PhD in computer science from Bilkent University, Ankara, on the subject of parallel data mining, or big data. Since then, I've primarily worked on Artificial General İntelligence (AGI), or AGI. My specialty is transfer learning, that is, I've designed a long-term memory system for AGI, I've designed scalable, parallel general purpose-machine learning algorithms for human-level AI. I've also been working on deep learning and AI theory. For my theoretical contributions to universal induction, I've received the Kurzweil Best AGI Idea award in 2015. Well, why am I a member of EHFirst? First of all, it is a great team with prominent professionals from the longevity and bioinformatics research community, therefore they know which are the forthcoming problems and how to attack them. Second, it is the first application oriented AI platform on the blockchain, machine learning has the potential to revolutionize healthcare and AI in general can make a huge impact in healthcare as all sorts of predictions and analyses in medicine can be automated. Combined with the AI analyses of millions of research papers, we can make medicine more effective, personalized and preventive. Third, owing to the multitude of data types in medicine, and the data’s higher than usual complexity, the next-generation machine learning algorithms may be particularly helpful, which is a formidable challenge for AGI research. And fourth, and finally, I believe, well, I know that we can defeat biological mortality one day, careful but sure steps are being taken in longevity research, which may eventually help us naturally revitalize by reprogramming our cells to a more youthful state. Along the way, we will need ever more careful monitoring and treatment of our more vital bodies, and AI based automation of routine but important healthcare tasks will help greatly.

All the details are on the website http://www.ehfirst.io/ and in the White Paper http://www.ehfirst.io/#wp.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
It's all about the cryptocoins
March 07, 2018, 10:44:09 AM
100% correct, I can't name one company that pleases every user of their products.
I do think that people who use the product, even if they complain, have an own choice whether they continue using it or not.
Because if it was really that bad, they would stop using it, no? Smiley
anyhow... Can't see how a voting system would add value to this particular project, but I've might have missed a part here Smiley
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
March 07, 2018, 10:36:05 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
Yes, thats what Iam missing in many projects. Community makes suggestions or warns against dangers and dev often ignore them.
This happens more often as I thought before I've dealt with crypto.

it doesn't just happen with crypto. happens in every industry that has fans. and it's probably for the better. fans are never pleased and often ask the impossible.

but imo it is not a target to do something like that now. this could be done when the project has matured a lot.
There are always conflicts of opinion within the Community, and it is virtually impossible to please everyone, so some companies adhere to voting systems, but there will always be people who are not satisfied with what has been defined
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
March 07, 2018, 09:14:47 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
Yes, thats what Iam missing in many projects. Community makes suggestions or warns against dangers and dev often ignore them.
This happens more often as I thought before I've dealt with crypto.

it doesn't just happen with crypto. happens in every industry that has fans. and it's probably for the better. fans are never pleased and often ask the impossible.

but imo it is not a target to do something like that now. this could be done when the project has matured a lot.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
March 07, 2018, 09:10:27 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Software Development and Longevity Keith Comito:
What about medicine in the future?

Watch the video:
https://youtu.be/gYq4fInf6rA

Thanks for the new video. It has a lot of Information about the project and i agree, this one is better than the last one. More Information flow needed although.
Yeah, I like that they are keeping us informed all the time  Wink
I think this kind of videos are going to be need to keep the interest in the project during the long wait until the publication of the project.

Cool, Thanks for the new video. Glad to know some cutting-edge information about the medicine industry.

That video contain some new things to me and I repeated couple times. I am waiting for more videos from ehealth team.

They reveal too much in the whitepaper already perhaps.  Do you mean another video like the introductory demo ?

I think the video was to summarize what was in the whitepaper. Not necessarily new to me.
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
March 07, 2018, 09:02:24 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
So i think it will be better to focus on the other important things rather than thinking about providing a voting system, ehfirst token already has a great value according to what they've promised on the whitepaper.

Yes, focus on other stuffs will be better. Health is a very long subject to dig and it needs serious treatment than the other one.
hero member
Activity: 815
Merit: 502
March 07, 2018, 08:54:55 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
So i think it will be better to focus on the other important things rather than thinking about providing a voting system, ehfirst token already has a great value according to what they've promised on the whitepaper.
full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 100
March 07, 2018, 07:58:47 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
Yes, thats what Iam missing in many projects. Community makes suggestions or warns against dangers and dev often ignore them.
This happens more often as I thought before I've dealt with crypto.

it doesn't just happen with crypto. happens in every industry that has fans. and it's probably for the better. fans are never pleased and often ask the impossible.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
March 07, 2018, 07:56:24 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Software Development and Longevity Keith Comito:
What about medicine in the future?

Watch the video:
https://youtu.be/gYq4fInf6rA

Again the "talking head". It is necessary to hire specialists for good video with graphics, and the voice should be off-screen. Otherwise it's some kind of a lecture or a sermon. I did not even watch until the end ... A good project needs a good promotional video.

I agree with you. It is still better than the old one but i don't think an ico video should be like this. I love the project even i didn't want to see all. How can you lure new people with this?

Personally I dont care about that. I know how many fancy videos dont have anything to present and just impress with visuals.
I'm more for the content instead of the looks. I can have this video running in the background (even if its just a few minutes) and get all the information
and the views on this project of the different team members of EHF. I dont think the video would get more attention if it was more like the intro video.
Rather i dont like the intro video at all? Its just the "movie voice" and unrelated pictures which looks nice, throwing around buzzwords...that makes me more sceptical then the "interviews"
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
March 07, 2018, 07:48:47 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.

Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. Smiley
Yes, thats what Iam missing in many projects. Community makes suggestions or warns against dangers and dev often ignore them.
This happens more often as I thought before I've dealt with crypto.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1012
March 07, 2018, 07:43:17 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Software Development and Longevity Keith Comito:
What about medicine in the future?

Watch the video:
https://youtu.be/gYq4fInf6rA

Again the "talking head". It is necessary to hire specialists for good video with graphics, and the voice should be off-screen. Otherwise it's some kind of a lecture or a sermon. I did not even watch until the end ... A good project needs a good promotional video.

I agree with you. It is still better than the old one but i don't think an ico video should be like this. I love the project even i didn't want to see all. How can you lure new people with this?
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
March 07, 2018, 07:06:57 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.

There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
March 07, 2018, 06:45:48 AM
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
March 07, 2018, 06:40:36 AM
A voting system for ehf token holder can be a good system I think, community always like to be listened, and the sucess of a crypto currencies is also due to the community behind it. EHF can build something around that I think.

What kind of votes do you want to let the community participate here?

A voting system like NXT, if you check out NXT wallet they have a voting system built in the wallet. It cost NXT to make votes

Yes, but for what purpose? For what do you want to vote in this project? I don't really see a use for community votings here.

I've seen NAV community vote to successfully reduce the staking rewards from 5% to 4% so that the saved amount can be used for other critical purpose beneficial to the project. This works. EHF community can also vote on certain strategic matters that will directly affect the stakeholders - this helps the community feel involved and give opportunities for the devs to get things done without too much fuss from the community.

they would still need to find reasons for the vote to happen. what would we be voting on?

And there will be a lot of reasons for the vote to happen. Believe me.

Then tell me please 3 situations in which eHealth would profit from community votes. Smiley
I also thought about the voting system and I couldnt find a good reason, but maybe we will hear from devs about it.
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
March 07, 2018, 06:05:16 AM
Tell me please about your project in a nutshell
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
March 07, 2018, 05:46:00 AM
I think it is important and the right thing to do to these periodic videos. The roadmap is so long and people need to know the team is still working and involved.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 105
March 07, 2018, 05:45:12 AM
A voting system for ehf token holder can be a good system I think, community always like to be listened, and the sucess of a crypto currencies is also due to the community behind it. EHF can build something around that I think.

It really depends on what is being voted on though. For many aspects of the project, like what is being developed, I would like the professionals to make the choices. But for things like token usage you can ask the investors/community.
newbie
Activity: 90
Merit: 0
March 07, 2018, 05:40:04 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Software Development and Longevity Keith Comito:
What about medicine in the future?

Watch the video:
https://youtu.be/gYq4fInf6rA

Thanks for the new video. It has a lot of Information about the project and i agree, this one is better than the last one. More Information flow needed although.
Yeah, I like that they are keeping us informed all the time  Wink
I think this kind of videos are going to be need to keep the interest in the project during the long wait until the publication of the project.

Cool, Thanks for the new video. Glad to know some cutting-edge information about the medicine industry.

That video contain some new things to me and I repeated couple times. I am waiting for more videos from ehealth team.

They reveal too much in the whitepaper already perhaps.  Do you mean another video like the introductory demo ?

it's normal that some information will repeat itself. not everybody reads the whitepaper in detail. some prefer video.

I think more video we have a chance to watch, better understanding of the project we will get. Doesn't metter if they are repeating themselves, what metters is that we stay informed and keep the interest in the project up.

Most of their videos introduce the teammembers and a little part of the project in more detail. I'm sure there will be coming more videos with more indept information. Especially when the timeline progresses further and the team will have to face new challenges
Don't forget the publication about eHealth. There are the information compressed to get a nice overview about the project. And translated in different languages.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
March 07, 2018, 04:42:44 AM
Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Software Development and Longevity Keith Comito:
What about medicine in the future?

Watch the video:
https://youtu.be/gYq4fInf6rA

Thanks for the new video. It has a lot of Information about the project and i agree, this one is better than the last one. More Information flow needed although.
Yeah, I like that they are keeping us informed all the time  Wink
I think this kind of videos are going to be need to keep the interest in the project during the long wait until the publication of the project.

Cool, Thanks for the new video. Glad to know some cutting-edge information about the medicine industry.

That video contain some new things to me and I repeated couple times. I am waiting for more videos from ehealth team.

They reveal too much in the whitepaper already perhaps.  Do you mean another video like the introductory demo ?

it's normal that some information will repeat itself. not everybody reads the whitepaper in detail. some prefer video.

I think more video we have a chance to watch, better understanding of the project we will get. Doesn't metter if they are repeating themselves, what metters is that we stay informed and keep the interest in the project up.

Most of their videos introduce the teammembers and a little part of the project in more detail. I'm sure there will be coming more videos with more indept information. Especially when the timeline progresses further and the team will have to face new challenges
Jump to: