It is necessary to be aware of what we are embarking on, otherwise I know there would be many short-term investors, accustomed to quick gains, wanting their immediate returns soon after set-up in exchange. Ehealth is great and works something even bigger and more promising in Blockchain, your returns will be abundant, but be patient and zealous in your research
I guess there would also be some investors, even short-term, who just forget it for years and finally turn out to be millionares. Now the price is not that high and everyone may allow themselves to buy some tokens 
Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 361. (Read 97848 times)
i think there is not dividends at the moment?
fortunately, there is absolutely no dividends in talk or even planned. i think that something like that would just ruin the price of the tokens later on the exchanges totally. take a look at kickico project, they had dividends and now stopped it and start burning tokens to stabilize the price for the future.
Dividends can make sense but definitely not for every project, that for sure.
But thanks for the info about KickICO. Haven't realized they have stopped their dividend system.
Most of the divided system does not work out. I have seen many falls.
Don't dividends bring a lot of unwanted regulatory attention to your project?
Yes I think then you have to pay much more attention. Also US citizens are not allowed in investing in such ICOs, if I am not mistaken.
Exactly, or they should only target accredited investors, which is like 1m plus USD worth individuals
This isn't a get rich quick project anyway. Dividends require profit. The platform will only fully work after 2024 so this would be a long shot.
i think there is not dividends at the moment?
fortunately, there is absolutely no dividends in talk or even planned. i think that something like that would just ruin the price of the tokens later on the exchanges totally. take a look at kickico project, they had dividends and now stopped it and start burning tokens to stabilize the price for the future.
Dividends can make sense but definitely not for every project, that for sure.
But thanks for the info about KickICO. Haven't realized they have stopped their dividend system.
Most of the divided system does not work out. I have seen many falls.
Don't dividends bring a lot of unwanted regulatory attention to your project?
Yes I think then you have to pay much more attention. Also US citizens are not allowed in investing in such ICOs, if I am not mistaken.
Exactly, or they should only target accredited investors, which is like 1m plus USD worth individuals
This isn't a get rich quick project anyway. Dividends require profit. The platform will only fully work after 2024 so this would be a long shot.
i think there is not dividends at the moment?
fortunately, there is absolutely no dividends in talk or even planned. i think that something like that would just ruin the price of the tokens later on the exchanges totally. take a look at kickico project, they had dividends and now stopped it and start burning tokens to stabilize the price for the future.
Dividends can make sense but definitely not for every project, that for sure.
But thanks for the info about KickICO. Haven't realized they have stopped their dividend system.
Most of the divided system does not work out. I have seen many falls.
Don't dividends bring a lot of unwanted regulatory attention to your project?
Yes I think then you have to pay much more attention. Also US citizens are not allowed in investing in such ICOs, if I am not mistaken.
Exactly, or they should only target accredited investors, which is like 1m plus USD worth individuals
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
There are some things that AI cant copy.
I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.
I agree. Doctors would even fight eHealth if they felt threatened by the project but it will just be a great complementary tool for patients and doctors.
The AI components is NECESSARY, AI can check your data, and compare it with data from other patient or people, or from a big database to reference and extrapolate your information, and bring closer a better diagnose for your particular case, this will HELP doctors immensely, so you get the most accurate diagnosis possible for the condition you have, be it just a cold, or a disease you didn't know you could have, or your doctor, so the AI component is essential.
Also the AI part is much cheaper. Imagen everytime someone puts in data to check into the system and some doctor has to check for it if there is something or not. This would be super expensive and would help no one in the end. But an AI can be a perfect extension for doctors.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
There are some things that AI cant copy.
I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.
I agree. Doctors would even fight eHealth if they felt threatened by the project but it will just be a great complementary tool for patients and doctors.
The AI components is NECESSARY, AI can check your data, and compare it with data from other patient or people, or from a big database to reference and extrapolate your information, and bring closer a better diagnose for your particular case, this will HELP doctors immensely, so you get the most accurate diagnosis possible for the condition you have, be it just a cold, or a disease you didn't know you could have, or your doctor, so the AI component is essential.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
There are some things that AI cant copy.
I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.
I agree. Doctors would even fight eHealth if they felt threatened by the project but it will just be a great complementary tool for patients and doctors.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
There are some things that AI cant copy.
I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
There are some things that AI cant copy.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.
that's why they're gonna have real doctors working for ETH. you can't have AI giving out diagnostics, not yet.
Despite all the advances to be implemented through Ehealth and other AI-related projects currently, it still seems impossible to dispense with Human labor; at some point progress may evolve and lead us to a stage where the application of Human labor is expendable, and I believe they get there pretty quickly
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.
that's why they're gonna have real doctors working for ETH. you can't have AI giving out diagnostics, not yet.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.
I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.
The long roadmap shows it is a genuine project.
That and the fact that we have seen members of the team on video. Most projects only show pictures of people you don't know if they even exist.
They can show only pictures provided they also post a real professional profile link like linkid
I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.
I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.
The long roadmap shows it is a genuine project.
That and the fact that we have seen members of the team on video. Most projects only show pictures of people you don't know if they even exist.
I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.
I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.
Well, a platform like this needs regular updates for sure, and health care is really complicated. We are talking about human lifes, that is one reason why new products often needs years to pass trials etc.
I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.
I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.
Well, a platform like this needs regular updates for sure, and health care is really complicated. We are talking about human lifes, that is one reason why new products often needs years to pass trials etc.
Jump to: