Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 452. (Read 97847 times)

member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 23, 2018, 10:40:47 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well.

Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way
It is really expected that this system will make less mistakes because of the implementation of AI and blockchain. I am just curious if there will be many bugs from the beginning.

there will certainly be bugs at the beginning  , but those get iron out as time passes.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 23, 2018, 10:39:57 AM
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done
hero member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 857
January 23, 2018, 10:29:35 AM

Explanatory article. There are three main features of the platform:
1. Remote diagnostics and recommendations.
2. Knowledge base of medical literature.
3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place.

I think this is the most important part of it: "3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place."

It is perfect to reach record from any place with a permission could make a great improvement in the health industry.
I would say the data itself and its accessibility. The latter itself is not a big deal in the internet era, but the precise medical data that can only be accessed by you from everywhere - that's another step in implementing blockchain technologies into everyday life.

It is one of the biggest problems in the health industry. Doctors can't get accurate patient history and they are making the same tests over and over again. And they can't just make the right diagnosis because they don't have the before data.
perhaps with the help of ehf they can solve this problem to keep an accurate indication of all the analyzes, tests, symptoms, previous diseases stored on the blockchain for easier consultation by the doctor...
To be honest I do not fully understand how will be the process of diagnosis. I would like to know more about this.


I suppose that remote diagnostics will be a certain set of questions, such as a test, at each stage of which the neural network will cut unsuitable branches and approach the final diagnosis with some permissible error. Since without analyzing the patient, it is impossible to diagnose more accurately. But, for example, acute pain in pancreatitis, holicystitis and appendicitis can be very similar, and there it often happens that there is no time to argue, and an exact diagnose is already being made during the operation. For such emergency cases, of course, this platform is not suitable.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 23, 2018, 10:25:57 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well.

Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way
It is really expected that this system will make less mistakes because of the implementation of AI and blockchain. I am just curious if there will be many bugs from the beginning.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1012
January 23, 2018, 10:17:45 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well.

Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way

Yes but you need to enter good parameters first. About diagnostic it is not easily done. Also, it is not that easy to people gives credit to a machine for an important diagnose.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
January 23, 2018, 09:52:04 AM
On telegram was posted a link to this video on TED, in this case the platform may have been useful to catch the problem in time. Worth to watch.

https://youtu.be/Fb3yp4uJhq0
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Become Part of the Mining Family
January 23, 2018, 09:40:47 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well.

Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
January 23, 2018, 09:04:10 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
January 23, 2018, 09:01:25 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

If you have a serious disease you go lots of doctors for a second, a third or even for a fourth opinion. Health is a serious thing and you can't just trust everyone easily.

Also if a doctor suggests a surgical procedure I think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary (which isn't quite often).
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
January 23, 2018, 08:21:38 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

If you have a serious disease you go lots of doctors for a second, a third or even for a fourth opinion. Health is a serious thing and you can't just trust everyone easily.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
January 23, 2018, 08:12:32 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

If you seek a second opinion, it means you're not satisfied with the first one or want to confirm a diagnosis. You shouldn't blindly trust anybody, but rather take it with a grain of salt. The more opinions you hear, the better picture you'll have. And I'm sure eHealth will take care of its reputation and do a background check on doctors who will be on their platform.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 08:00:48 AM
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.

My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 112
January 23, 2018, 07:59:40 AM
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 262
January 23, 2018, 07:43:07 AM
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
January 23, 2018, 07:10:50 AM
Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me Smiley I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

and we want the white paper

the whitepaper will be released this month so there's not much waiting left.

I think they're gonna do it this week no? that's what I though from previous posts.

You're correct. That info is from the website, where they have some milestones
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 23, 2018, 05:51:57 AM

Explanatory article. There are three main features of the platform:
1. Remote diagnostics and recommendations.
2. Knowledge base of medical literature.
3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place.

I think this is the most important part of it: "3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place."

It is perfect to reach record from any place with a permission could make a great improvement in the health industry.
I would say the data itself and its accessibility. The latter itself is not a big deal in the internet era, but the precise medical data that can only be accessed by you from everywhere - that's another step in implementing blockchain technologies into everyday life.

It is one of the biggest problems in the health industry. Doctors can't get accurate patient history and they are making the same tests over and over again. And they can't just make the right diagnosis because they don't have the before data.
perhaps with the help of ehf they can solve this problem to keep an accurate indication of all the analyzes, tests, symptoms, previous diseases stored on the blockchain for easier consultation by the doctor...
To be honest I do not fully understand how will be the process of diagnosis. I would like to know more about this.

A really good question. What is needed for high quality remote diagnostics??? I would like to hear Administrators.


Yes, that is a key question, I would also like to know what type of device you will use to perform the diagnosis.

there is another project, called health monitor which has a goal of creating and distributing machines that diagnose whether you have certain conditions based on your breath. that could one solution and a partnership for the project.
I think in the future there will be robot docs who make diagnoses for small diseases and for the real ones you will still need normal doctors.

I am not sure if this is the future. You always need to have a person you can trust. I am not sure if a robot is the best choice for things about health.
If the robot only make suggestions and give hints, it can assist perfectly together with a human doctor. Thats the only way.
Yes, I cannot imagine anyone or anything to make final desicion except for a real doctor. At least cannot imagine now and in the near future
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
January 23, 2018, 05:48:45 AM

Explanatory article. There are three main features of the platform:
1. Remote diagnostics and recommendations.
2. Knowledge base of medical literature.
3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place.

I think this is the most important part of it: "3. Access to the patient's medical records from any place."

It is perfect to reach record from any place with a permission could make a great improvement in the health industry.
I would say the data itself and its accessibility. The latter itself is not a big deal in the internet era, but the precise medical data that can only be accessed by you from everywhere - that's another step in implementing blockchain technologies into everyday life.

It is one of the biggest problems in the health industry. Doctors can't get accurate patient history and they are making the same tests over and over again. And they can't just make the right diagnosis because they don't have the before data.
perhaps with the help of ehf they can solve this problem to keep an accurate indication of all the analyzes, tests, symptoms, previous diseases stored on the blockchain for easier consultation by the doctor...
To be honest I do not fully understand how will be the process of diagnosis. I would like to know more about this.

A really good question. What is needed for high quality remote diagnostics??? I would like to hear Administrators.


Yes, that is a key question, I would also like to know what type of device you will use to perform the diagnosis.

there is another project, called health monitor which has a goal of creating and distributing machines that diagnose whether you have certain conditions based on your breath. that could one solution and a partnership for the project.
I think in the future there will be robot docs who make diagnoses for small diseases and for the real ones you will still need normal doctors.

I am not sure if this is the future. You always need to have a person you can trust. I am not sure if a robot is the best choice for things about health.
If the robot only make suggestions and give hints, it can assist perfectly together with a human doctor. Thats the only way.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
January 23, 2018, 05:30:18 AM
Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential


For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 23, 2018, 05:09:25 AM
Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me Smiley I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

and we want the white paper

the whitepaper will be released this month so there's not much waiting left.

I think they're gonna do it this week no? that's what I though from previous posts.
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 04:29:21 AM
Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
Jump to: