Hi, Gleb!
Whilst both projects are totally different, where Qvolta is aiming to provide p2p crypto exchange platform, the Tracor is aiming to solve various logistic problems around the world.
As for style of presentation they used in whitepaper, one can clearly see some similarities. However, we are in no way connected and we have nothing in common
Thank you for your time and attention!
What you consider
some similarities, others see two white papers with both having over 30% the exact same content with some aspects changed only to reflect their respective brands.
Here's a question for you: Wouldn't a non-nefarious actor (you) distance themselves from a nefarious actor (them) who copied their white paper, going as far as to publicly avow that they'd have legal immediately look into the issue?
Since that's not what you penned, let alone even remotely allude to, it's safe to assume that either both entities have the same master, or it's Qvolta who copied Tracor's content.
Bruno
Ok, let me explain that.
First of all, we have absolutely nothing in common with Tracor project.
Thank you for pointing this out. We will start investigating why their whitepaper written in a very similar way.
Style of presentation is the only thing that looks alike. Our project already has MVP during pre-ico. Our pre-ICO started earlier than Tracor's.
They are not listed much on ico-trackers.
If you go to Tracor webpage, there are no names, no team.
And whilst you can see names in whitepaper, those are just names without links to actual profiles.
Seems like that is clearly a plagiarism from their side.
Thank you for letting us know. We will solve that issue.