Why are bounty hunters constantly accused of selling their tokens for a low price from the first days? Can't the teams themselves or the investors who bought the coins on a presale, sell coins at such a low price?
Anyone can sell tokens in the market. But it seems illogical to sell assets five times cheaper than face value. Bounty hunters did not buy these assets, so it may seem that they can sell at any price. 
Topic: [ANN][ICO] ⭐️⭐️⭐️ROMAD - NEXT GENERATION ANTI-VIRUS! WORKING PRODUCT!⭐️⭐️⭐️ - page 137. (Read 94796 times)
October 18, 2018, 03:59:06 PM
October 18, 2018, 03:04:48 PM
Bounty hunters would not be in a hurry to sell the received coins after listing, if all the projects were engaged in promoting not only the project, but also their own coins.
Perhaps you `re right. But this is only a guess. How can a team promote their tokens? And why do they needs it?
A lot of depends from the price of the tokens. It price of tokens is rather good the bounty hunters may sell the tokens just to get someting. If price of tokens is small they may wait till the good time.
In this project, the price of the token forms the price for using the antivirus, so the price for such a coin should not fall and vice versa only grow
In all the projects the price of the tokens depends haw often use the product. So the project must have an useful product that the price of the tokens rise.
I think this is about this project. The token acts as a user fee. Ie if the antivirus is popular the price of the token is rising. I want to wait for this moment))
Now the ROMAD team is actively working to promote the project and attracts the attention of a large number of users. So ROMAD token will be expensive.
October 04, 2018, 11:17:50 AM
This project will definitely be useful for users because everyone needs protection.
However, it is necessary to take into account that not all use antiviruses, some users use long-known antiviruses, some users use only free software. 
October 18, 2018, 11:53:31 AM
The project may like at the beginning, and then not like at the end of the campaign. The fact is that some projects change the conditions at the end or after the end of the bounty campaign.
You are right. Now to much ICO change the conditoins during the ICO campaign. It is realy very hard to find a good project for the bounty.
One year ago ICO lasts about one month. Some ICO collected money for one day. Now ICO can lasts during 6 month and bountists waiting there tokens too long and nobody knows when they get the tokens. It becomes rather usual. That is why it is very important to chose the right ICO.
October 18, 2018, 11:25:39 AM
The project may like at the beginning, and then not like at the end of the campaign. The fact is that some projects change the conditions at the end or after the end of the bounty campaign.
You are right. Now to much ICO change the conditoins during the ICO campaign. It is realy very hard to find a good project for the bounty.
October 04, 2018, 04:34:53 AM
In the case of the ROMAD project, the situation with the price of a coin is folded differently, because users will need project coins. This means that there will always be demand for them and the price will not drop very low.
Perhaps you are right because the business model of the project is related to the use of utility tokens. According to my observations, projects with passive income or utility tokens are best hold on. October 18, 2018, 10:54:38 AM
The project may like at the beginning, and then not like at the end of the campaign. The fact is that some projects change the conditions at the end or after the end of the bounty campaign.
You are right. Now to much ICO change the conditoins during the ICO campaign. It is realy very hard to find a good project for the bounty.
October 18, 2018, 09:42:31 AM
Today there are a lot of projects coming out and hunters participate in many bounty companies as no one knows which project will be successful.
This is a kind of diversification. Of course, all projects will not be successful. But some of them will develop into large profitable companies. October 18, 2018, 06:35:24 AM
The project may like at the beginning, and then not like at the end of the campaign. The fact is that some projects change the conditions at the end or after the end of the bounty campaign.
I have come across this situation many times. First, some conditions are completely different in the company. And some questionable projects require at the end of the bounty to go through KYC
October 18, 2018, 06:35:17 AM
Bad reviews will harm the project's reputation and, in fact, investors will not want to deal with such a team.
Yes, bounty hunters can influence teams. There have been cases when a team made a decision under the influence of bounty hunters.As I know bounty hunters try to do a good revies of the ICO and promote the project good. If they do not like the project they do not participate in bounty.
Today there are a lot of projects coming out and hunters participate in many bounty companies as no one knows which project will be successful.
October 18, 2018, 06:33:58 AM
Even the participation in bounties is risky. Very often the projects do not pay bountists, very often the project do not list the tokens at exchanges and bountists do not know what to do with tokens, very often the price of the tokes falls down and bountists receive nothing.
When tokens start trading on exchanges, some bounty hunters sell these tokens at market prices. This is a very low price, sometimes tens times lower than the ICO price. This is also not the best outcome for bounty hunters.Why are bounty hunters constantly accused of selling their tokens for a low price from the first days? Can't the teams themselves or the investors who bought the coins on a presale, sell coins at such a low price?
October 18, 2018, 06:28:28 AM
The project may like at the beginning, and then not like at the end of the campaign. The fact is that some projects change the conditions at the end or after the end of the bounty campaign.
I have come across this situation many times. First, some conditions are completely different in the company. And some questionable projects require at the end of the bounty to go through KYC
October 17, 2018, 01:32:58 PM
Bad reviews will harm the project's reputation and, in fact, investors will not want to deal with such a team.
Yes, bounty hunters can influence teams. There have been cases when a team made a decision under the influence of bounty hunters.As I know bounty hunters try to do a good revies of the ICO and promote the project good. If they do not like the project they do not participate in bounty.
October 17, 2018, 12:41:05 PM
Bounty hunters would not be in a hurry to sell the received coins after listing, if all the projects were engaged in promoting not only the project, but also their own coins.
Perhaps you `re right. But this is only a guess. How can a team promote their tokens? And why do they needs it?
A lot of depends from the price of the tokens. It price of tokens is rather good the bounty hunters may sell the tokens just to get someting. If price of tokens is small they may wait till the good time.
In this project, the price of the token forms the price for using the antivirus, so the price for such a coin should not fall and vice versa only grow
In all the projects the price of the tokens depends haw often use the product. So the project must have an useful product that the price of the tokens rise.
I think this is about this project. The token acts as a user fee. Ie if the antivirus is popular the price of the token is rising. I want to wait for this moment))
October 17, 2018, 11:31:26 AM
Moreover, active participants in bounty campaigns devote much time to disseminating information, completing assignments and attracting referrals. It will be a shame if their work is not paid.
Who will be shamed? 
Those who do not pay are not ashamed. They will cynically laugh. And those who will not get rewards, there is nothing to be ashamed of. But they will have something to think about.If the project is successful, then he often pays bounty rewards. Since this is a bad advertisement for a project, if it is cheating the bounty hunters
I agree. Those investors who are just eyeing the project can bypass it if they read that the team did not pay a fee.
October 03, 2018, 01:32:51 PM
Today, the working product is a key factor in conducting a successful campaign to attract investment for further development and further distribution of the product to the end user.
At the IPO, the company offers to buy shares for an existing business in order to expand its business.In this sense, you are right, an ICO project with a finished product is similar to an IPO company with a working business.
October 17, 2018, 11:21:18 AM
Bounty hunters would not be in a hurry to sell the received coins after listing, if all the projects were engaged in promoting not only the project, but also their own coins.
Perhaps you `re right. But this is only a guess. How can a team promote their tokens? And why do they needs it?
A lot of depends from the price of the tokens. It price of tokens is rather good the bounty hunters may sell the tokens just to get someting. If price of tokens is small they may wait till the good time.
In this project, the price of the token forms the price for using the antivirus, so the price for such a coin should not fall and vice versa only grow
In all the projects the price of the tokens depends haw often use the product. So the project must have an useful product that the price of the tokens rise.
I think this is about this project. The token acts as a user fee. Ie if the antivirus is popular the price of the token is rising. I want to wait for this moment))
October 17, 2018, 11:19:05 AM
Moreover, active participants in bounty campaigns devote much time to disseminating information, completing assignments and attracting referrals. It will be a shame if their work is not paid.
Who will be shamed? Those who do not pay are not ashamed. They will cynically laugh. And those who will not get rewards, there is nothing to be ashamed of. But they will have something to think about.Unfortunately or joyfully until regulation in this area of activity, everything will be built on trust
October 17, 2018, 08:44:32 AM
Moreover, active participants in bounty campaigns devote much time to disseminating information, completing assignments and attracting referrals. It will be a shame if their work is not paid.
Who will be shamed? Those who do not pay are not ashamed. They will cynically laugh. And those who will not get rewards, there is nothing to be ashamed of. But they will have something to think about.If the project is successful, then he often pays bounty rewards. Since this is a bad advertisement for a project, if it is cheating the bounty hunters
I agree. Those investors who are just eyeing the project can bypass it if they read that the team did not pay a fee.
October 17, 2018, 08:38:50 AM
Even the participation in bounties is risky. Very often the projects do not pay bountists, very often the project do not list the tokens at exchanges and bountists do not know what to do with tokens, very often the price of the tokes falls down and bountists receive nothing.
When tokens start trading on exchanges, some bounty hunters sell these tokens at market prices. This is a very low price, sometimes tens times lower than the ICO price. This is also not the best outcome for bounty hunters.Why are bounty hunters constantly accused of selling their tokens for a low price from the first days? Can't the teams themselves or the investors who bought the coins on a presale, sell coins at such a low price?
Jump to: