Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] ⭐️⭐️⭐️ROMAD - NEXT GENERATION ANTI-VIRUS! WORKING PRODUCT!⭐️⭐️⭐️ - page 212. (Read 94796 times)

jr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.
I'm interested in the product and the perspective of the project, but the situation with awards for hunters is really not beautiful.

On the one hand, the reduction in the number of tokens to reward members of the bounty campaign is very unpleasant news. But on the other hand, if participants receive less coins, but the price of these coins will be several times higher, is it really bad?

Why did you decide so? The total number of coins has not become smaller. Just less bounty members will receive. It does not affect the price of the coin
jr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 1
Many wrote here that investors are interested and the like. A professional investor is interested in company to keeping word. If this is the case with bounty hunters, then how will it be with investors?

Very often, bounty hunters and investors are treated differently. For the project, these are different categories of people to the same extent
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
According to white paper, the total number of tokens is 30,000,000,000. 2% percent is allocated for the international campaign, that is, 600,000,000 tokens. 35% of this amount is allocated to the signature, that is 210,000,000 tokens. Why in the SPREADSHEET 42 000 000 is specified? I'm waiting for explanations and I hope that this is a mistake, not an intentional deception of the participants in the campaign bounty.

It's not a mistake. The number of tokens and bounty rewards were indeed changed due to the company's development. We signed an agreement with Chinese partners - the number of tokens had to be changed.

This is very sad news. I consider this dishonest in relation to the bounty of the company. 12 weeks people did advertising
The fact that the agreement with the Chinese partners was signed is, of course, good news ... But the changes have affected the participants of the charitable action for the worse.

In fact, it's more like an excuse than a real deal!
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 250
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.

The project on the foreground remains very interesting but payments on the bounty of course have upset me

The project is popular and collect a lot of money. So the bountists will receive enough. There are a lot of participants but common bounty budjet of 5% is rather big.
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
Many participants and reduced rewards. This is already becoming a trend. Hunters must defend their rights.

Unfortunately, the bounty hunters do not have their own trade union that defended their rights. It's very sad that the conditions change so
To date, many projects change conditions and reduce rewards, unfortunately this happens often. The trade union is of course needed)

Because this kind of activity is not regulated either. It often happens that if the team sees that their project will be successful they lower payments on the bounty ((
jr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 1
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.

The project on the foreground remains very interesting but payments on the bounty of course have upset me
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 250
Why do you doubt the success of this team? What are the highlights of their work? Or do you just do not like to read well-deserved praise?
I doubt the success, no less than failure. In such cases, you need to be realistic. Praise is not well-deserved yet(wait many months), so it's flattery. I don't like flattery.

I think the project is very stong and will be successful. And there are a lot of bounty hunters. It is very popular among investors.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
Any support is important for young teams, including moral support. Therefore, to express your opinion on the actions of the team is useful for all of us.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.
I'm interested in the product and the perspective of the project, but the situation with awards for hunters is really not beautiful.

On the one hand, the reduction in the number of tokens to reward members of the bounty campaign is very unpleasant news. But on the other hand, if participants receive less coins, but the price of these coins will be several times higher, is it really bad?

Perhaps you wrote this without thinking.  Grin Now the price of the project's token is one, and it will not increase until the tokens get into the stock exchange and their capitalization and demand grow.

Oops, the error turned out. Well, nothing, the price of the same tokens project ROMAD can rise after the listing?
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
Many participants and reduced rewards. This is already becoming a trend. Hunters must defend their rights.

5% is a rather big sum for bounty. I think ROMAD collect a big sum of money so 5% will be a big sum. All the people want to participate in good project that is why so many bounty participants.


You are a little mistaken. These 5% go from the total amount of released tokens, and not from the collected amount of investment.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 11
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.
I'm interested in the product and the perspective of the project, but the situation with awards for hunters is really not beautiful.

On the one hand, the reduction in the number of tokens to reward members of the bounty campaign is very unpleasant news. But on the other hand, if participants receive less coins, but the price of these coins will be several times higher, is it really bad?

Perhaps you wrote this without thinking.  Grin Now the price of the project's token is one, and it will not increase until the tokens get into the stock exchange and their capitalization and demand grow.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.
I'm interested in the product and the perspective of the project, but the situation with awards for hunters is really not beautiful.

On the one hand, the reduction in the number of tokens to reward members of the bounty campaign is very unpleasant news. But on the other hand, if participants receive less coins, but the price of these coins will be several times higher, is it really bad?
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
News from facebook

Google Bans Cryptocurrency Mining Android Apps From the Play Store✅

Following Apple's lead in banning cryptocurrency mining apps, Google has also updated its Play Store policy this week to ban apps that mine cryptocurrencies on users' devices in the background❗️

📱However, there are countless cryptocurrency mining apps, including MinerGate, AA Miner, NeoNeonMiner, and Crypto Miner, still available on the Play Store.



I can not understand: who will benefit from this ban?
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
Many participants and reduced rewards. This is already becoming a trend. Hunters must defend their rights.

Unfortunately, the bounty hunters do not have their own trade union that defended their rights. It's very sad that the conditions change so
To date, many projects change conditions and reduce rewards, unfortunately this happens often. The trade union is of course needed)

No one will create a union for members of the bounty campaigns, at least for now. Unfortunately, it's sad to realize that you're participating in the campaign bounty and count on one payment, and you get less on the way out.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 11
The Chinese market sector is quite rich. In this territory, many companies may be interested in the antivirus program of this project and buy its licenses in large numbers.

There are a lot of hachers in China too. So the protection of the computers will be necessary. Chinese are interesing in different developments and activly implement them.

The choice of the project to move towards China is obvious! It's easier to sell such a product

Entering the Chinese market is one foot to get to the Asian market. For a young start-up, this is a fairly promising step.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 11
Many wrote here that investors are interested and the like. A professional investor is interested in company to keeping word. If this is the case with bounty hunters, then how will it be with investors?
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
According to white paper, the total number of tokens is 30,000,000,000. 2% percent is allocated for the international campaign, that is, 600,000,000 tokens. 35% of this amount is allocated to the signature, that is 210,000,000 tokens. Why in the SPREADSHEET 42 000 000 is specified? I'm waiting for explanations and I hope that this is a mistake, not an intentional deception of the participants in the campaign bounty.

It's not a mistake. The number of tokens and bounty rewards were indeed changed due to the company's development. We signed an agreement with Chinese partners - the number of tokens had to be changed.

This is very sad news. I consider this dishonest in relation to the bounty of the company. 12 weeks people did advertising
The fact that the agreement with the Chinese partners was signed is, of course, good news ... But the changes have affected the participants of the charitable action for the worse.
jr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 1
And here is the same story with rewards for hunters. So praise this project ... On the part of devs it is, at least, unfair.
I'm interested in the product and the perspective of the project, but the situation with awards for hunters is really not beautiful.
jr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 1
Many participants and reduced rewards. This is already becoming a trend. Hunters must defend their rights.

Unfortunately, the bounty hunters do not have their own trade union that defended their rights. It's very sad that the conditions change so
To date, many projects change conditions and reduce rewards, unfortunately this happens often. The trade union is of course needed)
member
Activity: 686
Merit: 11
With the right organization, in a blockchain, this is hardly possible. However, in Facebook, the use of reposts is common, this does not distort the original information.
Jump to: