Topic: [ANN][ICO] savedroid - BITCOIN SAVING MADE EASY! - page 156. (Read 55441 times)

Obviously they have tested it. Also after use people will write reviews about that platform, and as per reviews Developer Team will make changes as per requirement.   

It's no rocket science that price or cost of services change over time due to market situation and is not in the control of the project owners... IT'S THE MARKET SITUATION... just like the price and cost or txn of btc is not the way it is years back same also for altcoins

Yea profit is sure when you invest in the savedroid project but not the main reason why you havr to invest in the project

I believe most people invest in the projext because they see the idea it tries to implement and want to see the idea work in the real world and would like to be part of the successful implementation of the idea

many would says that savedorid is just tampering the amount sold in the dashboard. i dont know if this is true, i hope not. but where i can possibly verify it? just to be sure that the amount in the dashboard is true.

Thanks for the explanation, that makes it clearer for me. Hope it remains an example and the fee percentage will go down when you start:-)
On the other hand, if you want to provide easy access to cryptocurrencies as you plan, then you can of course charge higher fees.
but as you say, the market will adjust that

LOL

You can download it now, this is ico phase.

Even as an estimate the number is more than astronomical and is in zero cases suitable for anyone to save money.




What if I told you the team said look in the whitepaper.


Guess what

It is not in the whitepaper.




There is nothing clear. It is at best vauge how the app will make money.

Nobody,    nobody knows how much it will cost to buy crypto with the app that should be for the masses.
Kind of important for a savings app.





Indeed that is what was done. The details were verified by the team.



This just fits exactly what I have been saying: What are the fees to buy crypto? SD:"read the whitepaper bro"  What part of the whitepaper, could you just tell me SD: "what you didnt look on the xlxs sheet?"   Hey it says 15% what is that? SD:"it is 7.5% two times a month" "7.5% is high" -   SD: not for UI exchanges - "yes it is"  - SD:  we dont know how much it will cost, it will change.   

So now the vauge answer of "it will change"

But magicly this estimiate higher than any exchange on earth is out there.

Alright.



Keep in mind this is a savings app, in this case the fees are not just some small thing. So no this is not the same as paypal or groupon. Indeed with the fees as the currently are in all documentation and all the prices of fees that have been confirmed by the team. Indeed a piviot would be the only way.

No need to give attention to such negative comments, yes in case person is providing details about the reason behind such comment then we can check and cross verify.

I think for this business model it is all agile. On pre-ico's business model things are working, I am not sure about the pre-ico numbers; but it seems to be working and growing healthy. With post-ico i think the founder has cleared that it would depend on how the market would perform to actually fix the actual numbers. It is good that concerns are stated; he will have to experiment and study the data generated from the post-ico traction and amend accordingly. Businesses should be flexible to change and I don't expect any ico to stick to every word in the whitepaper. The businesses operate towards a bigger goal, and is making money. Anything that could stop that or minimize that should be eliminated or restructured that is why in many cases we see ideas come out as one thing and pivot to a completely different thing; take groupon for example it started as a whole different thing. My point is change is core for the success of any business, fees are no exception. Paypal has high fees but many justify that to the services and guarantees they get. fees are always debatable and I think the deciding factor would be the performance of the business with those fees.

But just a short while ago it was indeed in a message from you very much about wrong or right, and i quote:
Futhermore the “ whatever I have“ that you, you say is wrong are your own words.
Combined with company documents.
These are not assumptions, this all based on what you told me directly and your own documentation.



 

It's not about wrong or right, neither is the world black nor white. It's an example, neither more nor less. Please adjust it to your assumptions, that's why we offered it for a download and made it public.

That is not even a ballpark range, as I said the data comes from your documents, and you personaly. If you are wrong, and your documentation is wrong, only then am I wrong. When you "adjust" that sounds like you will just keep the same % on top of whatever you can get from the market and if that is anywhere, near   what you have projected now you will be more whole numbers % higher than other offers out there. Even with "UI".


As I said "it will change" is an answer after people question the 7.5% as being too much.

As I said "it will change" is also too vague and does not show how the app will make money.

As said will adjust it to market situation half a year from now. I cannot predict the future

Yeah you are right. Savedroid is handling the community and customer work pretty well. Easy to reach them both here in the forum and on Telegram.

The rapid increase in sales statistics daily is really interesting. They must have done a really good job in promotion. It's paying off

What I have is from you,     personaly







The information I have is from you, personaly and the savedroid documentation.


So you mean it doesnt cost 7.5% anymore? Great what is the new revenue model? Do you still think the average person that puts in 100euro (under your projections) will be able to save money paying the fees and the 2 euro a month app fee?


If needed I will show the screenshot of the conversation if anyone thinks it did not happen,  no problem. Do not act like you have not been asked about this.


You could just say that it is not 7.5% , that the team changed it, but you have not said that. More than enough time to say something concrete.
Trying to say that other companies dont change or learn, is not anything concrete.


Do not act like these numbers do not come out of your documents and your typing, they do.


If it is no longer 7.5% how much will it cost, what are your new projections?

Honestly savedroid is one of my second most favorite project based on their customer service
they are swift to respond and agile in fixing issues.
kudos to the workers.

Thanks for the reply... that's what i needed to know... good work tobson2 you have really been helpful around here

So whatever you seem to have: it is wrong. We're working iteratively and therefore of course also make wrong hypotheses/assumptions and correct them over the time. Nobody is perfect, neither is savedroid. But we're willing to learn from any mistakes and improve based on this experience. That's what also makes us different from many companies out there, willing to iterate and learn over the time.

Nope that is in the revenue model, not the token model, and on top of that it was confirmed by the team, and defended by them.


Nope,  the "assumption" comes from a discussion with you, and the file that I have posted.


Thats it.


If you want I can post the discussion in which you confirm the 7.5%

or you can pretend that it never happened, its up to you.


It goes like this

15% ! that is high
no it is 7.5% buy and sell once a month.
oh
7.5% is high




later


no no , places with good UI charge more or that much.



no no,   it can change.


On the one hand it is defended, when that doesnt work out, "it can change" when that doesnt work out "it is based on asumtions" it is based on clear documents from savedroid, of which I asked the team directly about and they confirmed. LOL

Have you already blocked my posts? This would explain why you stick at the same false assumptions for weeks.